Spider,
Your recap is wrong. Yes, the system was 13-0 thru the 24th; however, Utah won the C game (11/9 series), Detroit won the B game (11/17 series), and New Jersey won the B game (11/24 series).
Spider,
Your recap is wrong. Yes, the system was 13-0 thru the 24th; however, Utah won the C game (11/9 series), Detroit won the B game (11/17 series), and New Jersey won the B game (11/24 series).
So now that we established that Boston was in fact a V2 play according to JM, does that mean that we lay off them tonight as a former V1 play?
Kangy, based upon your statement in a previous post that you were starting your Denver series with the in-conference game against SA on 12/5, that would lend itself to the notion that the V2 plays are enveloping the V1 plays. Otherwise we would have to wait and see if Denver failed to cover by 3+ points before starting the series.
I understand that there will be no consistency with a crook like JM, and the parameters will be changed to suit his needs, but I just want to figure out how we want to play these going forward as a community.
My thought is just playing all road trips of 3+ games with at least 2 games out of conference. I will start with the beginning of each trip. That makes Boston NOT a play tonight as the series is closed and Denver play starts on 12/5 as you said.
That sound accurate to you guys?
So now that we established that Boston was in fact a V2 play according to JM, does that mean that we lay off them tonight as a former V1 play?
Kangy, based upon your statement in a previous post that you were starting your Denver series with the in-conference game against SA on 12/5, that would lend itself to the notion that the V2 plays are enveloping the V1 plays. Otherwise we would have to wait and see if Denver failed to cover by 3+ points before starting the series.
I understand that there will be no consistency with a crook like JM, and the parameters will be changed to suit his needs, but I just want to figure out how we want to play these going forward as a community.
My thought is just playing all road trips of 3+ games with at least 2 games out of conference. I will start with the beginning of each trip. That makes Boston NOT a play tonight as the series is closed and Denver play starts on 12/5 as you said.
That sound accurate to you guys?
So now that we established that Boston was in fact a V2 play according to JM, does that mean that we lay off them tonight as a former V1 play?
Kangy, based upon your statement in a previous post that you were starting your Denver series with the in-conference game against SA on 12/5, that would lend itself to the notion that the V2 plays are enveloping the V1 plays. Otherwise we would have to wait and see if Denver failed to cover by 3+ points before starting the series.
I understand that there will be no consistency with a crook like JM, and the parameters will be changed to suit his needs, but I just want to figure out how we want to play these going forward as a community.
My thought is just playing all road trips of 3+ games with at least 2 games out of conference. I will start with the beginning of each trip. That makes Boston NOT a play tonight as the series is closed and Denver play starts on 12/5 as you said.
That sound accurate to you guys?
Boston never was a v1 play 3 games against opposite conference - Boston trip is @ Mia, Char, SA. OklC
and Boston couldn't have been consdered a v2 play vs Mia because the following 2 games weren't opposite conference.
How could the Boston series be closed?
I do have them as a v2 tonight.vs Char.
It used to be cut and dry when a team was aply or not now....its all about interpretation.
Best of Luck
So now that we established that Boston was in fact a V2 play according to JM, does that mean that we lay off them tonight as a former V1 play?
Kangy, based upon your statement in a previous post that you were starting your Denver series with the in-conference game against SA on 12/5, that would lend itself to the notion that the V2 plays are enveloping the V1 plays. Otherwise we would have to wait and see if Denver failed to cover by 3+ points before starting the series.
I understand that there will be no consistency with a crook like JM, and the parameters will be changed to suit his needs, but I just want to figure out how we want to play these going forward as a community.
My thought is just playing all road trips of 3+ games with at least 2 games out of conference. I will start with the beginning of each trip. That makes Boston NOT a play tonight as the series is closed and Denver play starts on 12/5 as you said.
That sound accurate to you guys?
Boston never was a v1 play 3 games against opposite conference - Boston trip is @ Mia, Char, SA. OklC
and Boston couldn't have been consdered a v2 play vs Mia because the following 2 games weren't opposite conference.
How could the Boston series be closed?
I do have them as a v2 tonight.vs Char.
It used to be cut and dry when a team was aply or not now....its all about interpretation.
Best of Luck
Kangy, based upon your statement in a previous post that you were starting your Denver series with the in-conference game against SA on 12/5, that would lend itself to the notion that the V2 plays are enveloping the V1 plays. Otherwise we would have to wait and see if Denver failed to cover by 3+ points before starting the series.
Kangy, based upon your statement in a previous post that you were starting your Denver series with the in-conference game against SA on 12/5, that would lend itself to the notion that the V2 plays are enveloping the V1 plays. Otherwise we would have to wait and see if Denver failed to cover by 3+ points before starting the series.
Kangy,
That does answer my Q. There was a bit of confusion about how to play these going forward and like Puppet says, it certainly leaves itself open to interpretation. That why I wanted to pin you down on how you were playing them, only because I respect your opinion on these things. As always, I very much appreciate the input. GL to everyone....
Kangy,
That does answer my Q. There was a bit of confusion about how to play these going forward and like Puppet says, it certainly leaves itself open to interpretation. That why I wanted to pin you down on how you were playing them, only because I respect your opinion on these things. As always, I very much appreciate the input. GL to everyone....
I got the line at +2.5 but I am only allowed to buy 2 ponts.
So I took it up the A$$ by 1/2 point
Hope you guys got to push.
I got the line at +2.5 but I am only allowed to buy 2 ponts.
So I took it up the A$$ by 1/2 point
Hope you guys got to push.
I got the line at +2.5 but I am only allowed to buy 2 ponts.
So I took it up the A$$ by 1/2 point
Hope you guys got to push.
I got the line at +2.5 but I am only allowed to buy 2 ponts.
So I took it up the A$$ by 1/2 point
Hope you guys got to push.
stay away from the indiana game!!
I took Sacramento yesterday... The line was just to small for me to pick indiana!
A system is great but you can't wager on a team without looking at the stats!
stay away from the indiana game!!
I took Sacramento yesterday... The line was just to small for me to pick indiana!
A system is great but you can't wager on a team without looking at the stats!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.