View Our New Forum Updates. You can always switch back to what you're used to.
View Our New Forum Updates.
You can always switch back to what you're used to.

The Magna Carta 2014

Participants:
< Page of 15 > >>
Views: 59603
Posts: 371
< Page of 15 > >>
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #1

With the start of the new season, and the fact that the previous thread is so long, this is where the selections will be posted.

Please refer to the other thread if you have any questions. All of the chases in this thread are 5 game chases.

***All dogs on the run line; All favorites on the money line***

*********************************************************
MC1 - (1-0)
1 - (1-2)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Arizona, NYM, LAA
2 - Cincinnati, Baltimore

MC2 - (1-0)
1 - (1-0)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Washington, Cubs, Toronto, Milwaukee

MC3 - (0-0)
1 - (0-1)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Atlanta Over, Philadelphia Over
2 - Baltimore Over

MC4 - (1-0)
1 - (1-1)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - San Francisco Under, Seattle Under
2 - Minnesota Under
Quote Post Report User
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #2

*********************************************************
MC1 - (3-0)
1 - (2-3)
2 - (1-2)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - Arizona, LAA
3 - Cincinnati

MC2 - (5-0)
1 - (5-0)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

MC3 - (2-0)
1 - (1-1)
2 - (1-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - Atlanta Over 

MC4 - (1-0)
1 - (1-3)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - San Francisco Under, Seattle Under, Minnesota Under
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #3

*********************************************************
MC1 - (6-0)
1 - (2-4)
2 - (3-1)
3 - (1-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

MC2 - (5-0)
1 - (5-0)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

MC3 - (2-0)
1 - (1-1)
2 - (1-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - Atlanta Over (Push yesterday)

MC4 - (2-0)
1 - (1-3)
2 - (1-2)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

3 - San Francisco Under, Minnesota Under
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 333
Posted: #4

Thanks for the system plays!! I have a quick question. I thought I understood the rules and this is from your first post on the other thread:

****Fade a home team immediately after returning from a six or more game road trip chasing for 5 games***

Wouldn't we be fading the White Sox? Or, since the Indians just came off of a 6 game home stand and now on the road, does that negate the chase? Or, should we wait until after this first game and then fade the winner. I think I am answering my own question but, I never saw this rule in your thread so, I figured I would get clarification from you.

Thanks you in advance for your help!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5713
Posted: #5

I have Clev as a play (FADE ChiSox). I think this is a conflict with the MC2 system which would be a play on the Sox (FADE Clev).

I've come up with a few of these conflicts already and have gone with whatever system chase betting on what I felt was the better team. You could always be creative and take Clev on the MC1 system ML and the Sox on MC2 RL. That is essentially how you would play both anyway. If Clev wins by 1, you win both. If there is a different result, you will win one and continue the chase with the other.  

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 42
Posted: #6

BD I have been away too long what is this new MC2, MC3 and MC4 business?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by parlay100:

BD I have been away too long what is this new MC2, MC3 and MC4 business?

These are new and successful variations of the original version from last year. I haven't posted how to get the plays, but I will post them.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 538
Posted: #8

I'm personally just using the system from last year and only fading teams under .470. I'm also doing the reverse of this system (chasing road teams) and only tailing teams over .530. It looked profitable in the limited backtest I did and I'm using labby lines in case it crashes and burns.

Best of luck with the new updates.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 114
Posted: #9

Thanks bDnews for the plays and the early post today. BOL to all. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 42
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by bDnews:


These are new and successful variations of the original version from last year. I haven't posted how to get the plays, but I will post them.


Excellent.  I can always count on you to make an improved version.
Thanks
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #11

*********************************************************
MC1 - (7-0)
1 - (3-4)
2 - (3-1)
3 - (1-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Pittsburgh, LA Dodgers, Toronto, Houston, Tampa Bay, NY Mets, Detroit
2 - Cleveland

MC2 - (5-0)
1 - (5-0)
2 - (0-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Atlanta, St Louis, San Francisco, Minnesota
4 - Seattle

MC3 - (3-0)
1 - (1-2)
2 - (2-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - San Diego Over

MC4 - (2-0)
1 - (1-3)
2 - (1-2)
3 - (1-1)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

1 - Milwaukee Under, Arizona Under, Baltimore Under, LAA Under
4 - San Francisco Under
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #12

The NYY were a MC1 play yesterday for any wondering why the record suddenly increased by 1.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #13

MC4 should be (3-0) with Minnesota Under yesterday. Big play tonight on San Francisco Under, with a possibly bigger one looming tomorrow.

San Francisco is (9-1) Over on the season.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by MortgageMan:

Thanks for the system plays!! I have a quick question. I thought I understood the rules and this is from your first post on the other thread:

****Fade a home team immediately after returning from a six or more game road trip chasing for 5 games***

Wouldn't we be fading the White Sox? Or, since the Indians just came off of a 6 game home stand and now on the road, does that negate the chase? Or, should we wait until after this first game and then fade the winner. I think I am answering my own question but, I never saw this rule in your thread so, I figured I would get clarification from you.

Thanks you in advance for your help!!

This play actually crossed MC1 and MC2 so I just waited for the outcome taking the loser as a G2, which happens to be Cleveland.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:

I have Clev as a play (FADE ChiSox). I think this is a conflict with the MC2 system which would be a play on the Sox (FADE Clev).

I've come up with a few of these conflicts already and have gone with whatever system chase betting on what I felt was the better team. You could always be creative and take Clev on the MC1 system ML and the Sox on MC2 RL. That is essentially how you would play both anyway. If Clev wins by 1, you win both. If there is a different result, you will win one and continue the chase with the other.  


I've had conflict with a few chases taking both where the stats justify based on offensive and defensive numbers. But for the most part, it's easier (and cheaper) to just wait and take the next game as a G2. IMHO
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by TheBeefMan:

I'm personally just using the system from last year and only fading teams under .470. I'm also doing the reverse of this system (chasing road teams) and only tailing teams over .530. It looked profitable in the limited backtest I did and I'm using labby lines in case it crashes and burns.


Best of luck with the new updates.

How would you play this using labby lines? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1710
Posted: #17

MC2 suddenly there is a Sea 4 posted.

Just trying to follow.

Thanks

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #18

Quote Originally Posted by puppetm716:

MC2 suddenly there is a Sea 4 posted.

Just trying to follow.

Thanks


Oakland fit MC1 for the last series, but won every game. They are now a G4 for MC2 based on their last 3 wins.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1710
Posted: #19

Giants game is at 9 already and only in 4th inning. 

MC4 going the distance on Sat.

Best of Luck

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #20

*********************************************************
MC1 - (12-0)
1 - (8-6)
2 - (3-2)
3 - (1-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - Pittsburgh, Detroit
3 - Cleveland

MC2 - (9-0)
1 - (8-2)
2 - (1-1)
3 - (0-1)
4 - (1-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - St Louis

MC3 - (3-0)
1 - (1-3)
2 - (2-0)
3 - (0-0)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - San Diego Over

MC4 - (6-0)
1 - (4-4)
2 - (1-2)
3 - (1-1)
4 - (0-0)
5 - (0-0)

2 - LAA Under
5 - San Francisco Under
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #21

Quote Originally Posted by puppetm716:

Giants game is at 9 already and only in 4th inning. 

MC4 going the distance on Sat.

Best of Luck


The 1st Game 5...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1037
Posted: #22

Respect on the under play, San Fran 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1037
Posted: #23

Respect on the under play, San Fran 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2002
Posts: 6012
Posted: #24

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 73
Posted: #25

Big game 5 winner!!! Here's to keeping the wins rolling 
< Page of 15 > >>
Desktop View: Switch to Mobile View