Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hello Gents, Although I never post I have a very solid record. I will pick 30 games over a period of time starting tonight and after 30 games you can see my percentage. Please don't write negative replies, I appreciate all of your feedback and have been following a lot of your picks for quite some time. Good luck to all!! Tonight's picks 2/17 Fordham -3 Evansville -10 Oklahoma -3.5 New Mexico -2.5
|
thorne2265 | 1 |
|
|
Funny cause the players and coaches that tweeted all agreed it was a catch.
|
thorne2265 | 41 |
|
|
He clearly had possession and then made a move. I understand the rule but it did not come into play in this particular play.
1. He caught the ball and maintained possession through the catch 2. Then he made a football move Catching the ball and maintaining possession negates the rule The football move to take two steps and make a lunge while maintaining possession took affect after he had already caught the ball. Are you guys blind or just in denial.
|
thorne2265 | 41 |
|
|
Of course nfl will agree with the ref to avoid controversy on a very controversial call. It doesn't matter to me I won, but it couldn't have been any clearer that it was a catch.
|
thorne2265 | 41 |
|
|
He clearly had possession, then taking 2 steps and lunging with the ball in his left hand was the football move. Come on!!
|
thorne2265 | 41 |
|
|
The catch and possession was soooo obvious it should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.
I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!
He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line He tucked the ball in with both hands He took a step to the 3 yard line He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee Even if the hit the ground and moved when it hit the ground, the ground can't cause a fumble. Possession was very obvious way before the lunge. And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone. Those who say it was not a catch need to quit, you are embarrassing yourselves. It was obviously a catch that resulted in a bad call, which caused the initial call (a catch) to be overturned (which is really confusing to me) Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned. It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!! IT WAS A 100% CATCH |
thorne2265 | 41 |
|
|
This should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.
I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!
He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line He he tucked the ball in with both hands He took a step to the 3 yard line He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee Even if the hit the ground and moved, the ground can't cause a fumble. Possession was very obvious way before the lunge. And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone. Those who say it was not a catch need to quit, you are embarrassing yourselves. It was obviously a catch that resulted in a bad call, which caused the initial call (a catch) to be overturned (which is really confusing to me) Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned. It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!! IT WAS A 100% CATCH |
mp5070 | 149 |
|
|
This should not even be questionable and I even had GB ml and the under.
I have watched the reply 12 times in slow motion!!
He caught the ball and landed with both feet down on the 5 yard line He he tucked the ball in with both hands He took a step to the 3 yard line He grabbed the ball with one hand took another step to the 2 yard line He reached out with the ball in possession of his left hand He came short of the goal line with the elbow down and his knee Even if the hit the ground and moved, the ground can't cause a fumble. Possession was very obvious way before the lunge. And if you were to call it a fumble he regained possession in the end zone. Those who say it was not a catch need to quit, you are embarrassing yourselves. It was obviously a catch that resulted in a bad call, which caused the initial call (a catch) to be overturned (which is really confusing to me) Without undisputed evidence in should not have been over turned. It worked out great for my bet but Dallas got screwed!! IT WAS A 100% CATCH |
richig761 | 67 |
|
|
replied to
Went 6-0 tonight and leaving for Vegas Wednesday, timing couldn't have been better.
in College Football
I am leaving for Vegas on Wednesday, staying at he Bellagio.
If you happen to be there let me know, drink on me :)
|
thorne2265 | 5 |
|
|
created a topic
Went 6-0 tonight and leaving for Vegas Wednesday, timing couldn't have been better.
in College Football
I am new to covers but after reading most of your treads I will hopefully be accepted and fit right in. My preference in betting is College F Ball and NBA.
I had a great roll tonight, but, like most that is not always the case. I am from Ireland but live in the United States. I have been in Ireland for the last Three months but arrived back in the states on October 4th and since then have been one a roll and my book is not happy:( Aside from self capping games, I read other cappers threads and like to find the cappers that have the same reasoning as me for the final outcome of the game. I own my own business and don't always get the opportunity to get on here and post. I will try my hardest to give you my picks going fourth, This is my current record: NCAAF 9-2 NBA 14-3 NFL 6-4 (bookies game) Just so you know, NFL are fun bets for me, no $ to be made, the book generally controls the out come ( way too much $ involved) but I do enjoy the game. Best of luck to all going fourth, I will try to post my picks regularly. Cheers!!
|
thorne2265 | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.