Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by gatrhatr: are you serious. i bet your book loves you. do you always bet both sides. what an idiot. he said either or you dope... not both
|
Covers | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Little-Giant: Is there any reason to believe UNC's defense isn't still terrible? I think SC's practices are probably better. The ol' ball coach is hungry and SC seems more likely to me to be game ready in all aspects of the game week one. UNC might get flagged 15 times. I know they've got a lot of weapons and talent on offense, but I predict they will make too many mistakes to keep this game close. SC wasn't ready last yr when they got blasted at home vs A&M... that might change this yr, but i dunno
|
Covers | 33 |
|
|
all the key indicators pt to a tulane resurgence this yr and a duke letdown yr... i'm rolling with tulane +9.5
|
Covers | 21 |
|
|
spread is pretty high for an opening road game vs a halfway decent oponent, but i love the pokes to make a lot of noise this yr. i think they get it started off right with a blowout. OSU -23
|
Covers | 23 |
|
|
i'm with colonel. fiu +16.5
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by osu200200: spurrier can be as fired up and ready to go as he wants... a lot of coaches are. doesn't mean he will get the results. the sec is better than the acc, but the acc fared pretty well against them last yr and unc recruiting is pretty similar to the gamecocks. i'll take the seasoned team and the HOME team +3 pts. correction... game at bank of america stadium... still in north carolina, but will probably be more of an even split. i'll still gamble on the heels
|
Covers | 33 |
|
|
spurrier can be as fired up and ready to go as he wants... a lot of coaches are. doesn't mean he will get the results. the sec is better than the acc, but the acc fared pretty well against them last yr and unc recruiting is pretty similar to the gamecocks. i'll take the seasoned team and the HOME team +3 pts.
|
Covers | 33 |
|
|
I like the pts, but what do I know
|
Covers | 18 |
|
|
Take the pts
|
Covers | 12 |
|
|
BC for me too
|
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Louisville ML and under
|
Covers | 63 |
|
|
umass and under
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
rice -14
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
colorado +13.5
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
uab +23
|
Covers | 20 |
|
|
tennessee +17
|
Covers | 23 |
|
|
texas gets better and better week to week although the defense last week left much to be desired. not sure what happened there. big texas homer considering they're my alma mater, but will not be betting them here. would lean ksu if i were to bet this game
|
Covers | 18 |
|
|
stanford shouldn't "crush" anybody. oregon state plus the pts
|
Covers | 5 |
|
|
kentucky fried chicken plus the pts
|
Covers | 30 |
|
|
OSU super large on this one. they are still the better team and are in one hell of a spot coming off the big loss and wvu coming off the big win.
|
Covers | 19 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.