Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
They electric or old school? |
Yourdaddysolid | 28 |
|
|
Florida Atlantic i.q. is low.
Shot selection was beyond believable
Davis, with time running out, slows the ball?
Smart plays push the defense, and go right to the hole.
and i was on NW. high iq team |
jesron1269 | 27 |
|
|
defense matters |
crazy1464 | 15 |
|
|
Defense matters |
crazy1464 | 15 |
|
|
replied to
BYU down 48-40 with 11 minutes left. They will come back and win the game. In Game Live BYU moneyline +161
in College Basketball BYU got outcoached.
They should have been in zone a;l; game.
Not sure why they thought they could play man to man |
Bay2LA | 36 |
|
|
Wagner literally has only 6 players.
howard should wear them down |
jdrose21 | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mrusso:
@TJZags598 90-86, South Florida wins H to H. But KenPom is more important? Listen, I understand why they didn't get in but they are definitely one of the best 50 teams in the country. With all the automatic qualifiers from the tournament championships and then the upsets on top of that South Florida was doomed without a conference Championship. I live in Tampa Bay and I love what they did for the basketball community here. But go Heels, my team and I have them at +1750 to win it all.
They are far from top 50.
You will not find one ranking system that even has them in top 75. Barttovik, who i think is a better gauge than Kenpom, has them at 92
Can South Florida beat anyone in the NCAA tournament? Sure. Are they better than some "auto" bids. Definitely. Are they better than any "at large" bids. No. I can find one independent source that says South Florida is better than any at large bid. If you can, point one out.
I loved the year South Florida had. It was awesome for college basketball. They looked great when i watched them p[lay. But context is everything.
Those were great odds on heels. they definitely have a good shot and the National. Good luck brother!
|
Professor1258 | 53 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
@TJZags598 S Florida should have gotten in over FAU....FAU lost to Bryant/Florida Gulf Coast as -23+ fave's - Quad 4 losses..If u think Maine is bad...those 2 are bad.......Lost to Temple yesterday.... Did not even win the regular season conference for such a weak conference....They have 1 good win all season...and that is AZ.....not sure how they have a high NET ranking..Its BS...
While i am not a Florida Atlantic fan at all, and you raise very valid pts, i will ask you to come up with just one independent source that says South Florida is better than FAU
KenPom has FAU 41, S FLA 89.
Thats a HUGE gap |
Professor1258 | 53 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Professor1258:
Quote Originally Posted by Klaista2k: @Professor1258 They got their asses kicked by Tulsa. I'm sorry but if a team can't even beat Tulsa they don't deserve to be in. losing by 6 on the road isn't a kicking genius. Maybe check your math and come back to reality poncho.
The got killed at home by MAINE #248 |
Professor1258 | 53 |
|
|
@Professor1258 I watch 10x the college basketball you do, its my career.
They play in a weak ass conference, thats why the conference got only one bid.
if they were so Fn good, why did the conference only get one bid?
They are the best in conference, and ranked about 90 in all college basketball |
Professor1258 | 53 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by IntenseOperator:
TCU -(3-) / Utah St |
slikstiks99 | 31 |
|
|
They are not better than any at larges. |
Professor1258 | 53 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LB_Dirtbags:
Everyone on UConn as winning it all. I’ll be the few that’ll have them going home in the Elite 8 game….especially if Zona, Auburn, or Tennessee, or Iowa State are in their bracket.
Auburn, Iowa State will compete.
No way Arizonia hangs with CT. They cant play away from home They have a 109% true shooting defense on rd, that's worse that Bethune Cookman |
TJZags598 | 23 |
|
|
@LB_Dirtbags
Auburn has a better True Shooting Defense on road, alot better than Houston and Arizonia.
alot nore offense than Houston, and Arizonia.
Auburn should be on 1 line i believe |
TJZags598 | 23 |
|
|
Outside of CT, the rest are awful-
Purdue-cant compete without Edney. When he is not in the court, Purdue has trouble scoring. Guards, particularly Smith ( so over rated ), cant guard their shadow. They get beat by anyone with semi-decent guard play. Houston- All the defense in the world, only matter until you play a team with defense. They will never win a rock fight, they have no offensive plays other than one-on-one ad lib crap. North Carolina- They are way to streaky, and play to level of opponent. Had many opportunities to put NC State away yesterday with a run. and once hey fall behind, they cant catch up, no real interior game.
CT Is head and shoulder above these pretenders.
and the potential number 2 seeds are even worse; Iowa state , mAuburn and Illinois need to make the 2 line. |
TJZags598 | 3 |
|
|
Outside of CT, the rest are awful-
Purdue-cant compete without Edney. When he is not in the court, Purdue has trouble scoring. Guards, particularly Smith ( so over rated ), cant guard their shadow. They get beat by anyone with semi-decent guard play. Houston- All the defense in the world, only matter until you play a team with defense. They will never win a rock fight, they have no offensive plays other than one-on-one ad lib crap. North Carolina- They are way to streaky, and play to level of opponent. Had many opportunities to put NC State away yesterday with a run. and once hey fall behind, they cant catch up, no real interior game.
CT Is head and shoulder above these pretenders.
and the potential number 2 seeds are even worse; Iowa state , mAuburn and Illinois need to make the 2 line. |
TJZags598 | 23 |
|
|
ML wagers at half time? |
Eschenpod | 16 |
|
|
|
KingScorpio | 41 |
|
|
Does your book allow open ended parlays?
Eastern Kentucky: If they are favored by 7 (would be -300) then favored by 4 ( -200) then favored by 3 (-175), The return is +214
|
invest4profits | 10 |
|
|
@Wizerguy
|
Wizerguy | 100 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.