Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@kcblitzkrieg "Homophobic comments"?.Hold on,you are a guy?Oh I thought someone who just constantly whined and complained as much as you do,most certainly had to be a female. I have found peace.Hopefully one day you get a piece,so you don't have to come in here just trying to stir things up,like a little b*tch. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg: You would need a bunch of "those big dudes in white underwear surrounding her",lord knows your limp dick wouldn't be able to handle her.You know she'd kick the fuck out of you,if you tried anything all on your own.
Wow. Missed a doozy of a thread in this one.... Raidahs ran some circles around BuckFalls. Reminds me of that meme where the little blonde is sitting on the white couch by herself with all those big dudes in white underwear surrounding her about to do some bad things.... BuckFalls was the little blonde in this analogy |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
@kcblitzkrieg Ya I little d*ck sucker like you would see it that way.That's why your boy Raidahs was trying to change the subject,cause he could never quote where I supposedly said it.Only fools and clowns like you would think someone getting caught in constant lies would be the one who won the argument. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: If it's what you say,I love it.
Poor Trump The disgraced ex-president/sex-offender/convicted fraud/seditionist/racist/fascist leader of the MAGAs, can’t find an insurance company to underwrite his $464 million bond to cover the GUILTY judgment against him in the civil fraud case, his lawyers cried to an appeals court With good reason nobody trusts Trump Trump is appealing the ruling, but in order to stop the state from enforcing the judgment, Trump has to post a bond to be held in an account pending the appellate process, which could take years to litigate. |
PeterBlack | 457 |
|
|
replied to
GUILTY!! Verdicts for crimes are leading to heavy penalties and there's more to come!
in Politics Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN: My mistake I gave you a thumbs up instead of hitting the quote button.Mail a "Thank You" card to navarro while he's sitting in the slammer getting slammed,that will lift his spirits while he's crying like a bitch.If someone getting sent to jail makes you fools give him more votes.Then why is stinky trying to delay all his cases to after the election?Oh maybe that's because stinky's just worried about the only person he cares about not having to sit in jail for his crimes,his self.
Even more votes for Trump. |
Zeus4par | 143 |
|
|
replied to
GUILTY!! Verdicts for crimes are leading to heavy penalties and there's more to come!
in Politics @thirdperson March 19th starts "Tough Guy Week" at the Bureau of Prisons in Miami.We'll see how navarro's tough guy act plays out there.Just remember the reason you are there is for protecting the guy who will be sitting on his ass at home,all while people are trying to put things up yours.Have fun Petey! |
Zeus4par | 143 |
|
|
Batman The Movie,had to be late 60's ish.I had a few cousins around the same age (about 8 of us) so it was the 1st time all our parents thought we could handle (AKA Behave Ourselfs) at the show.That was a mistake,and they never let that mistake happen again. |
loisezora77 | 23 |
|
|
John Denver-Sunshine On My Shoulders I don't know for sure that this would qualify as a sad song,but it's meaning to me is sad. Rolling Stones -Memory Motel |
wacha | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Can't show me where I supposedly said you were pro-Putin can you?Even you don't have the balls to fully commit to what you are saying.You use "Maybe this" could be the reason,or MAYBE it's just you are pulling shit out of your ass to see if you can backtrack out of looking like an even bigger liar.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @Sidehatch Name who is giving Putin a pass on killing political opponents.I haven't seen your post in here bashing Putin for him killing his political opponents.So unless you can post something of you saying it in a different thread,I guess your name could be used to answer your question. Maybe this is where you started that part of it for some reason. What else are you to make of it? But no problem. I think I cleared up your statement about it by now. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Good,see there.We can agree that it's correct and another fuckin lie told by you.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @MrWhatsItToYa I would just go back and look at it. When I get as asking him — that is when you came in and said that I was pro-Putin,Another fuckin lie.This is word for word what I posted in my 1st response (post #63 if anyone wants to verify who is telling the truth,and who is making shit up) about the question you asked."Name who is giving Putin a pass on killing political opponents". Ahem!"I haven't seen your post in here bashing Putin for him killing his political opponents.So unless you can post something of you saying it in a different thread,I guess your name could be used to answer your question". Tell me again liar "where I come in and say that you are pro-Putin"? That is correct. We agreed on that already. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I feel like that guy,and that guy's quote,and you.
@MrWhatsItToYa But I will ask you an entirely different question about it. The obvious implication for some of this is Trump not calling a Putin a war criminal. That rankled a lot of folks. So, as you may or may not know, Sen Young has already said he will not support Trump because of this. After Super Tuesday— he then doubled down on it. This is a quote about the article. Tell me what you think about this. Because I think this is key as well as the funding part: OK, even if Trump is wrong on Ukrainian policy do you think that’s more important than how wrong Biden is on so many American policies? What country do we need our President to be right on most? I think that is a bit of the issue the Right has with the direction the Left is pushing with the funding. How do you feel about that — IF you take out that you obviously do NOT like Trump because I fully can appreciate that. How do you feel about that guy’s quote? Should GFY's. Do you really think I'm looking to get into another conversation with you?Ha,you got me looking to see if I could find a rafter that I think will hold me,so I can hang myself.Just as punishment cause I was stupid enough to get in the last conversation with you.You know what,I'll leave that question for the next poor bastard who gets stuck talking to you. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Another fuckin lie.This is word for word what I posted in my 1st response (post #63 if anyone wants to verify who is telling the truth,and who is making shit up) about the question you asked."Name who is giving Putin a pass on killing political opponents".
@MrWhatsItToYa I would just go back and look at it. When I get as asking him — that is when you came in and said that I was pro-Putin, Ahem!"I haven't seen your post in here bashing Putin for him killing his political opponents.So unless you can post something of you saying it in a different thread,I guess your name could be used to answer your question". Tell me again liar "where I come in and say that you are pro-Putin"? |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Ok liar,lets keep this shit going.Tell me in what post number,I said you were pro-Putin.Or even tell me a post # where I said anybody in here was pro Putin.You are just like fuckin trump,you just can't admit when you are wrong.Did you grow up in a privileged life where you parents or nanny's never made you admit and apologize when you were wrong?
@MrWhatsItToYa The only thing I am quoting you about was you saying I was pro-Putin because I had not denounced him. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Ya,I wish I could say the same about discussing things with you.
Like I said I enjoy that you discuss things. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: Why would you send something to me,but about what HE said?Without even explaining to me that it's about him?Of course I'm gonna think you are talking to me,when you are directly replying to me.Gee no wonder why the discussion with you always goes in circles.
@MrWhatsItToYa Yessir. #91 was to YOU but about what HE said. I was just asking who exactly he meant. Then when you started in you said I was pro-Putin because I had not denounced Putin already. I think that is when it deteriorated. No problem. Like I said I enjoy that you discuss things. You were "just asking who exactly he meant",by asking me?How the fuck am I supposed to know "who exactly he meant"? Again another lie,I never said anyone in here was "pro Putin",never. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: You were fine with commenting and quoting things I didn't say,you were so fine with it you did it 4 times.
@wallstreetcappers It is simply something I did not say. Like I said he is one of the few of you guys on the Left that really will discuss things. when I am the one being misquoted. I only "somewhat" discuss things,let's try and keep that straight. Show me 1 time where I misquoted you in this whole thread besides this last time where I purposely did it. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
Wallstreet,the moment he stops is the moment I'll stop,I can't just walk away if he's still saying shit.I just can't do it,it ain't in me. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
@Raiders22 I know you weren't the one who said it in this thread.But I thought that's the way we were playing the game now,all you have to do is quote somebody's name and then just make stuff up and say they said it.Cause that's what you done to me 4 times,in just this thread 1. post #91 This is a post from you directly replying to me-It is a bad way to argue your point.If you want to send more money over there-make a better case.Do not go straight to calling someone a Putin supporter if they do not want to.That is lazy logic at best-and a copout (it's two words,ha,man I don't know if I'll ever get used to your bad grammar) at worst because you cannot support your stance with valid reasons.- For 1 I have never mentioned sending money over there,or over anywhere.2.And I've never stated anybody was a "Putin Supporter".So both those were completely made up by YOU. 2. post #132 This is a post from you directly quoting something I've said-So,it is a terrible way to have a discussion by simply bashing politicians that do not agree with your thinking by accusing them of something they obviously are not.- The thing is I never bashed any politician about giving Putin a pass (besides trump and that was much later in the conversation),whether they agreed with my thinking or not.Nor did I accuse a politician of something.Both these things were (again)completely made up by YOU.Hmm,I think I'm starting to sense a pattern here. 3. post #135 This is a post from you directly quoting me again-Just neither of you addressed what HE claimed is all.- So now you are looking for me to address and verify what somebody else claimed,I never claimed it?Like I've said more then a couple times in here already,I have nothing to do with or would even know WHAT he claimed,so how can I possibly address it?But yet your trying to blame me for it. 4. post #136 This is a post from you directly quoting me even 1 more time-But that was what HE was implying.- Again I can't address or defend something that I didn't say and that somebody else might of implied. And some of these were already after I had told you more then a couple times I never said that,or that I can't be asked to explain or address what somebody claimed or might of implied. So now you know what it's like to have someone make up something,and then say you said something which you never said. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
@Raiders22 Yes you did,don't sit here and try and tell me you didn't say it. |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
|
@Raiders22 I'm asking YOU why you said "democrats continue to be the party of slavery". |
Sidehatch | 226 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.