Recent Posts

Thread Author phinatic93 Post Entries
TheSquare
TheSquare

I’d have to go back to confirm but I believe this conference’s games went 3-1 yesterday with respect to the under. 

TheSquare
TheSquare

I blindly took all 4 understand yesterday for this conference. Using “blindly” loosely because I knew this has been a GREAT under arena the past few years but didn’t actually cap the games. I played this one today as well and so far so good. an_cheers

FATHERBRO
FATHERBRO

Quote Originally Posted by phinatic93:

10/13 from deep through 16 minutes. Can only laugh when you have an under and something nutty like that happens.

Sac State 8/9       NAU 5/9

Sorry if I convinced anyone to take the under with me. The fact that it only went over the total by 4.5 points is a minor miracle. 

FATHERBRO
FATHERBRO

10/13 from deep through 16 minutes. Can only laugh when you have an under and something nutty like that happens.  an_roll_laugh

FATHERBRO
FATHERBRO

Quote Originally Posted by HoustonSports:

Quote Originally Posted by phinatic93:

My lean is under with the teams playing early in the AM at an unfamiliar venue. 
9:30 start time

Yeah, it’s not insanely early but 8:30am body clock for west coast sac state is definitely out of the norm for them. 

FATHERBRO
FATHERBRO
Probably just 1H though with the spread indicating a decent chance at a late game foulfest. 
FATHERBRO
FATHERBRO

My lean is under with the teams playing early in the AM at an unfamiliar venue. 

phinatic93
phinatic93

Quote Originally Posted by phinatic93:

Going with under 60.5/130.5 1H/FG. 2 bad teams on both sides of the ball. Relatively slow pace of play and defensive intensity will be there. Combined for just 124 points in Febraury's matchup despite a combined 48 free throw attempts. Lastly, they are playing at a great under arena.   BOL if you tail!

First half too easy ha an_nailbiter

phinatic93
phinatic93

Going with under 60.5/130.5 1H/FG.

2 bad teams on both sides of the ball. Relatively slow pace of play and defensive intensity will be there. Combined for just 124 points in Febraury's matchup despite a combined 48 free throw attempts. Lastly, they are playing at a great under arena.

 

BOL if you tail!

Moosecityusa
Moosecityusa

Quote Originally Posted by Moosecityusa:

mark my words. You heard it here first. Live line $50 +1500. For shits n giggles

Didn't get the win obviously, but they covered the 2nd half spread with ease. Good call! peace_5

phinatic93
phinatic93

I will sweat through the likely foulfest

phinatic93
phinatic93

Quote Originally Posted by GoSTLCards:

Wrong side here as well. I hope luck swings my way tomorrow.

Sorry to hear that. Fk luck though. Instead, I hope your picks smash and cash sweat free! an_cheers

phinatic93
phinatic93

Took under 68. Felt fortunate to have the very alive considering how the half started. Felt unfortunate with all of the last minute scoring. Felt very very unfortunate with the foul at 0.2 to make my push a loss. Such is wagering on sports I suppose!

I see that helped many with their 2h ATS plays so congrats! We've all been on the wrong side of these types of endings so although I'm a tad bummed, I'm happy for those who caught a late night break! Hope you all smash with Tuesday plays as well!!! :)

phinatic93
phinatic93

Quote Originally Posted by TheSquare:

This is why I hate betting college 2nd half O/U's. They are a total crap shoot... "Oh, in the first half, they scored 42 points? They'll easily score over 66 points in the 2nd half." Nope, they score right around the same number of points, 45... "Oh, a high scoring 1st half? They'll slow down cuz they're not going to score over 80 points again.." Nope, they score 90+ points in the 2nd half.. Just

So true. I took the live under at 120.5 at around the 8 or 9 min mark. Was watching and dropped as low as 111.5. Then 25 points in the last 4 minutes happened. Middled myself an_brickan_brickan_brickx10000000

phinatic93
phinatic93

Stanford should make things interesting and the spread is indicative of that. Stanford will shoot better in the 2nd half and we have late-game foulfest potential.

phinatic93
phinatic93

Over 75. I think line will climb...jumped from 74.5 before I could get it there.

smacksmiter
smacksmiter

Quote Originally Posted by skoonr3:

Houston is really good at ...SCORING.....

They are but they are a even better defensively based on efficiency metrics. They also play at the 260th slowest pace in the country. The worst part of their defense is allowing a high free throw attempt rate, but SMU is not good at getting to the line.

 

Sure, Houston could ball out offensively, but overall I see value in the under. 

smacksmiter
smacksmiter

Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter:

Really debating with myself about taking Houston here...Houston should be big time pissed off about losing their home winning streak to UCF last time out...SMU has really looked bad...might have packed it in for the season after that crushing loss to UCF last week...But ..then...Weird Henry is on Houston hard....Makes me take pause...

I'm on the under at 136.5. Looking for some pissed off defense peace_5

phinatic93
phinatic93

Quote Originally Posted by sportswagers:

on it as well.. GL

peace_5 Looking good so far. I don't see the game script/pace changing so hopefully we cruise with minimal to no late night sweats.

phinatic93
phinatic93

u75.5 (YTD: 35-29 and cold as iceeee)

Desktop View: Switch to Mobile View