Recent Posts

Thread Author weeks Post Entries
WNBA_Roxxy
WNBA_Roxxy
Upto -7 now.
I missed the boat here,too late

GL roxxy
ShayMonue
ShayMonue
Roxxy are you back on twitter ?
I want to get aboard again this season,last year was $$$,u da man bro
saigonbynight
saigonbynight
You wouldnt wanna watch the Marshall D on tape Vs WKU if youve already bet the under.
chungnuoc
chungnuoc
chungnuoc
chungnuoc
Chung stinkin the place up.

What is todays plays Chung ? 
MartyCon
MartyCon
Quote Originally Posted by jmw59:

At some point, these g-men are gonna break out of this.....I don't wanna be on the other side of the line when they do
oh dear 

Youre gonna come back in week 17 and say "told yer"
BigNiner
BigNiner
I just wanted to say,this is a great thread (besides the snidey digs and absolutely meaningless stats like teams who played in the rain and had a bye week off a loss on the road with a left handed QB are 46-0 ATS if playing in a dome)  well done guys 

At least niner posts his picks with what he believes to be his reason,whether you agree or not...good thread men.
CMJohnson1
CMJohnson1
Quote Originally Posted by punjabi:

 

Actually the Texans are not a hot mess.  Texans let a very good Seattle team back in the game and then next Sunday was a very tough spot to bounce back...San Fran off 10 days rest wanting to prove they are still a powerhouse.  Texans will bounce back and prove they are still a very good team.

Im not gonna hijack your thread here Johnson.
But this is a very good point.
Last week was an horendous spot for Houston,so is this week tho...This team is loaded...the QB however is not.I havent looked ahead but I wanna be on the Texans the week after they hit the niners buzzsaw.
IamPharoah
IamPharoah
Quote Originally Posted by BJ2112:

Saints are not even in the same league as the broncos.. No one is

Flowers always look nice in the summer...........
weeks
weeks
NFL Betting / . / View Post
Blehhh

YTD 4-2 +$2.05
I have 3 plays this week,which is a lot for me.However I havent time to write any up,sorry..

Saints
Jets
Raiders +10

Get the best number you can but it wont matter anyway

GL 


SuperSpiderman
SuperSpiderman
Quote Originally Posted by Peewee2820:

Biggest bet since you can remember? All three teams on the road? 
Really ?

weeks
weeks
NFL Betting / . / View Post
[Quote: Originally Posted by ScarletHokie] On the Tennessee game with you but can't  go against my Packers.  [/QuoteI wouldnt talk you off if Hokie  but I honestly think thats a close

GL this week bud 
CMJohnson1
CMJohnson1
bump
save johnson or one of shills doing it
Louis_IV
Louis_IV
Post person convention wow



Like em both Louis bud,GL 
Yung_Moolah
Yung_Moolah
Not enough chalk,stick bama in for a 4 teamer then we 
letsgoooo
letsgoooo
I agree,tho I dont believe in "traps"..books dont always want equal action.
This could of opened 10 and they still would of had more than 50% Denver action,makes no sense.
Just look at this thread,the majority all over Denver,10 wouldnt have stopped most of them.
letsgoooo
letsgoooo
Quote Originally Posted by ysaelee87:

I think I seen that the line opened Denver -3. It's up to 7.5 in my book. If it went to 10 that would b a pretty Significant jump. Haven't seen a line move 7 whole pts in NFL before .
'The open was 5.5,maybe some obscure site had diff but the world opener was 5.5
Stevie wonder could see that line wouldnt create equal action,-7 isnt creating equal action .... 

letsgoooo
letsgoooo
Lets pretend the lines are set to create equal action.

Lets keep the debate going,cause its a decent thread.
Why isnt this game 10 ?

Cause the majority of ATS money ,80% at the line service I look at is on Denver.

Whys this line not higher ?
weeks
weeks
NFL Betting / . / View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Ducati:

I like your assessment of the titan's game...I'm leaning the under as well.

Bol this weekend Weeks.
Dont get a bad number Ducati cause its only moving one way
http://www.donbest.com/nfl/odds/totals/

GL to you too,thanks 
nuggins
nuggins
Good Q nuggs,it appears to me you are one of the decent posters here.
So you may find this interesting reading

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/