Recent Posts

Thread Author L8kersFan74 Post Entries
Skanless1
Skanless1

Khabib -155

Chrisb96744
Chrisb96744

Quote Originally Posted by RyanOJ24:

Posted: 27 minutes ago "Quote" Quote Originally Posted by dumazz: Posted: Apr. 10, 2018 - 10:57 AM ET "Quote" I decided on the STL/MLW series and took the Brewers last night at +130 (managed to squeak out a win).FYI... a guy named underdog master posting at StatFox Forum back in 2005 was the originator of this system. He was like 162-2 over a three year period, playing one series at a time and was big on winning % at the opponents ballpark. MLW is/was 47% at STL. I believe he only played road dogs.   Nice hit on Milwaukee in game 1! Personally, I didn't think that series was an option, as I figured Milwaukee would be a favorite in game 2 or 3. That is also the first post on this thread. I could be wrong, but it was my understanding that he only played road dogs because it was easier to ensure that they would be road dogs for the entire series. However, most average teams facing Yankees, Astros, Nationals, and Dodgers will end up being home underdogs for the duration of their series. Getting the home team only makes it more appealing to me. I'm not really sure of a good source to find a team's history in a specific ballpark. Can anyone provide one for us?

 

Quote Originally Posted by dumazz:

Posted: about 4 hours ago "Quote" Guys FWIW, you can determine a team's historical winning % at an opponents park by doing a SDQL query at:http://killersports.com/The query for say... ATL @ WAS would be:team=Braves and site=away and o:team=NationalsI'm a rank novice at performing these queries but simple ones like this are not too hard to figure out. A lot of info at the site. This is a nice stat to have for determining what dogs to chase.

 

peace_5

Wally1317
Wally1317

Best of luck, Wally! clover

chaser15
chaser15

Just two days away..... an_cheers

ProfitMachine
ProfitMachine

Lines on Yankees and Washington are dropping very nicely..... Best to wait til game time to put those bets in for best value.peace_5

Vek
Vek

Never mind LOL .....I just noticed you posted that yesterday.

 

My mistake. Solid work.an_cheers

Vek
Vek

Agree on the Nova analysis...they had a horrible game today and still won by DD.

Vek
Vek

Not sure how youdy get the sweep by betting against yourself with Michigan ML and Loyola ML.

vline44
vline44

http://buffstreamz.com/watch/mma-3.php

sundance
sundance
GOAT..... It's "11/19 OU" which means 11 overs and 19 unders... Essentially meaning the UNDER was 19-11 with that particular umpire.

19-11 is 63.3%, which is very good... Additionally, assuming an average of -110 juice that would be a profit of 6.9 units just on those 30 total bets alone.
Patriots1133
Patriots1133
“I had a fever and a headache, but I’m fine now,” Thornwell said on Friday, according to ESPN. “I’m good.”
scalabrine
scalabrine
Quote Originally Posted by composite:

GL, but I think you're overvaluing the win vs Villanova. Nova was up 7 with 3:00 left. It was as much Nova losing that game as Bucky winning it.  

Incorrect...

The game was TIED with 3:00 left.

Nova was up 7 at the 5:31 mark.
jayfan
jayfan
Rookie alert
JimGunn
JimGunn
Mixed Martial Arts / UFN 86 / View Post
Fantastic work today, Jim. Killing it!
mlesnet
mlesnet
Quote Originally Posted by HoustonSports:

Covers 'mobile' is absolutely horrendous. Told them that and they disagreed vehemently but whatever. Stick with the full site

Agree 100%
SiuLungBao
SiuLungBao
This is great for up to the second line info at all major books...

http://www.madduxsports.com/college-basketball-lines.php
SiuLungBao
SiuLungBao
UNC is currently -9.5
nick69
nick69
I might do that on the moneyline, but, giving 8 points it's a very risky move, in my opinion. GL
packers1992
packers1992
Quote Originally Posted by mbiddy:

Line was never at 2, opened at 3 and after suspension announcement steadily rose.
Anteaters roll










Opened at 3, dropped to 2.5.....then steadily rose from there.
JimGunn
JimGunn
Thanks, Jim.