Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango: You should probably watch more football if you don't think Clemson is physical enough. Going to be a tough lesson learned tonight. Physical?... like the team that played NC in the ACC champ game? or the team that played OU? That's the problem with Clemson...which one is going to show up. You know Bama's front 7 on both sides of the ball are gonna bring it.
|
PapaShango | 26 |
|
|
The only hope the Jets have is if the defense scores. Geno will throw at least 2 picks, one will be a pick 6. He's no good.
|
SharperThanYou | 45 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by atlheatholder: From Logan on Covers: Arizona Diamondbacks (.119 BA vs. LHP – 28th) Arizona is in the mix in the National League West thanks to great two-way baseball. The Diamondbacks rank eighth in team ERA (3.43) and 10th in runs per game, averaging 4.62 runs on .251 hitting. The offensive production takes a serious dip versus lefties. The D-backs have totaled just 20 of their overall 97 runs off left-handed hurlers (20.6 percent) which has led to a dismal 3-8 record against LH starters, costing Arizona bettors -2.51 units. It’s also proved profitable for under bettors, with the club going 2-6 over/under when taking on a southpaw starter. thanks for that tidbit brotha.. add to that.. Cahill is a bum!
|
Covers | 3 |
|
|
I come on here a couple of times a week to check in with the fade squad. There's on poster in particular who is fade material week after week.. I'm not going to name names or but the guy is like 2-12 for his postings this week.. For this game he has posted the niners -7 and the under which is at 38.5.
Not like anyone gives a shit, but my lean is the MNF home dog. This season dogs are 5-2 on MNF home dogs are 1-0 SU.. Not sayin' the Cards ARE going to win but they could and at +255 could be worth a bite. I realize that their Offense has been stagnant and they have lost 4 in a row but their defense and home crowd are enough to get them within a td.. SF 27-24 in OT
|
Covers | 87 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jpgiesel: they are in san fran dummy FAIL.
|
Covers | 87 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Billybetthat: Some of you guys don't watch these games. They shut down Oregon in the sec half. Asu 5 units How'd that work out for ya?.. They shut down Oregon's second team offense in the second half.. so yeah, who watched the game and who didn't? No offense.. not gloating
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bkg1010: Defense, Sun Devils have it, UCLA not so much. ASU wins but UCLA may keep it close, maybe cover. ASU -6.5 Yeah.. we'll see how they come out without the cornerstone of that D, W. Sutton. It didn't work out so well after he left the game last week v. Oregon. Not sayin' that the results wouldn't have been too much different but..
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
This is a different defense without Will Sutton. UCLA may just pull a back door cover.
|
Covers | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bkg1010: Too many points IMO, Cats can play defense! Look.. I agree that 14pts may be too many but are you fucking serious.. WTF?.. can you not read? They give up 32pts a game.. that's not playing defense.
|
Covers | 17 |
|
|
Extraordinary
|
Covers | 58 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Nhenley: Cincy loss to fuckin Toledo...Enough said. Louisville -3.5 LARGE!!! Toledo is 7-1 with their only loss in their first game of the season @ AZ in OT. Though I didn't see the game, I'm guessing this was a classic "look ahead" to a conference foe...
|
Covers | 77 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by InVegas: @unchoop15 - VaTech isn't very good, as we now know. Louisville is battle tested, and at home. Lousville -3.5 Battle tested by whom, a 2-5 S.Fla team, an 0-7 So. Miss team, a 1-7 Fla. Int team? In none of these games could they cover the spread. I wouldn't trust this team to cover anything more than a FG. In fact, I could see Cincinatti winning this game as they have proven year after year, that they can go on the road and play spoiler in the weak ass big east.
|
Covers | 77 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by magicman1642: Tigers game one Full bank roll hit it hard. Solid $$$ mgmt. Say bye bye to your bank roll. No way is this Tigers team hitting well enough to take Verlander at a -163.. but GL to you sir...
|
Covers | 58 |
|
|
Could you plz set a cookie with this annoying Trojan ad so that it appears only once, not each time that I load a page.
This is possibly the most annoying ad ever. Thanks in advance. |
wasabitobiko | 6 |
|
|
I haven't taken a look at any forums in months.. just because of this nonsense... alas, I have a bit of free time on my hands (due mainly to the fact that I don't have a smart phone that I'm constantly playing with) so I go to see what's up with the ol' covers forums and here is the same douchemoronic bullshit on a different day.. Why did I even waste my time?..
I marvel at the stupidity of most of the posters thinking that someone must be a complete idiot for using a cellphone as a cellphone and he who claims to be a 'high roller', or 'vanzack' if you will, yet doesn't have a smart phone has proven himself a fraud. What a bunch of fcukin idiots.. seriously.. You're probably the same types of jackasses who'd spend ten minutes texting back and forth with someone rather than just call them and have the same conversation in 2 minutes.. I HATE THAT SHIT! Get off your 'smart phones' and go do something! |
vanzack | 28 |
|
|
good point shooter
|
Mack05 | 12 |
|
|
Not sure which game you guys were watching Sunday Night but the Jets (and I hate to say it) dominated a team playing to up their seed. I realize they rested a couple of injured players but they're injured, not a total rest day for them and they took a beat down. Revis completely shut down COC and will do so again this week. Best bet on the board is the under in that game. I see a 9-7, 10-6 sort of battle here. If either team gets a 10 pt lead, game over. First to 14 wins.. but again.. 3-3 at the half 10-6 final. If it stays below freezing Sunday, this game won't break 20 let alone 30 barring 3 defensive/special teams scores.
|
GWarner27 | 50 |
|
|
I see a 10-6 game here.. nice play.
|
Mack05 | 12 |
|
|
replied to
$$$$$ DONT BE A SUCKA FOO $$$$$ *** Divisional Round Games *** BIG PLAY ***
in NFL Betting
J E T S Jets, Jets, Jets! Cincy came to Jersey to win last week and put up an egg. Ocho was dominated and should rightfully change his name back to Johnson as stated in the pregame interview with Costas. Revis will dominate this matchup again. If the Jets can put up 14pts game over. Hell I could see a 9-7 type of game here.
|
ManRam24 | 137 |
|
|
uhh.. not sure which game you guys were watching last week but the Cowboys kind of got away with one. If McDouche hits the wide open D. Jackson, If McDouche doesn't fumble in the red zone. If Maclin catches the pass over the middle.. I could come up with a few more Cowboy mistakes but won't. There will be adjustments on both sides of the ball but it comes down to the line of scrimmage. If the Cowboys can dominate like Sunday, get pressure on McDouche and minimize the stupid penalties, Cowboys win. If they can establish the screen and McDouche checks down to Celek more it will open up and take advantage of the deep middle (the Cowboys secondary is susceptible to the home deep ball) the Eagles can definitely pull the upset.
|
pied_piper | 28 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.