Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GiLmo574 | 61 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Algorithm result for 8/15: Atlanta -173 (66.6%) 5.4--3.9. We are just going to post the best overall Algorithm play. Won on the Angels last night, hopefully the good luck continues. GL Mates! 8/14- Atlanta -173 (66.6%)
|
theboss215 | 2 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Algorithm result for 8/4: LA Angels -180 (69.4%) 5.9--3.4. We are just going to post the best overall Algorithm play. Lost horribly with Detroit and the under yesterday, apologize sincerely to all. We lost, but hopefully have a better day today. GL Mates! 8/14- LA Angels -180 (69.4%)
|
theboss215 | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
8/12: Col/SF o7.5 (62.9%) *Win* 8/12: Cincinnati -185 (66%) *Win* 8/11: NYY/TOR u9.5 -110 (58.9%) *Win*8/11: Pittsburgh -173 ( 65.1%) *Loss* 8/10: Col/SF o7 -115 (59%) *Loss* 8/10: Pittsburgh -140 (61.4%) *Loss* 8/9: Baltimore -1 -135 (65.6%) *Loss* 8/8: COL/LAD o7 (60.4%) *Win* 8/8: WAS -1 -180 (70.4%) *Push* 8/7: CHC/SD o7 +107 (67.2%) *Win* 8/7: STL -1 -140 (67.9%) *Loss* 8/7: CHW -1 -153 (68.4%) *Loss* 8/6: WAS -1 -155 (66.4%) *Push* 8/6: CHW -1 -163 (69%) *Win* 8/5: NYY -184 (65.3%) *Win* 8/5: Atlanta -235 (70.7%) *Win* 8/4: LA Dodgers -285 (74.4%) *Win* 8/4: Detroit -185 (69%) *Win* 8/3: Atlanta -255 (74.5%) *Win* 8/2: Boston -192 (68.5%) *Loss* 8/1: Cincinnati -175 (67.5%) *Win* 7/31: Milwaukee -230 (72.1%) *Win* 7/30: Milwaukee -180 (66.4%) *win* |
theboss215 | 11 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Algorithm result for 8/4: Detroit -140 (61.7%) 6.4--4.4. Also the Det/Min u9.5 (57.3%). GL Mates! 8/13- Detroit -140 (61.7%) 8/13- Detroit/Minnesota u9.5 (57.3%)
|
theboss215 | 11 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Looks like a clean sweep for the algorithm. 4-0 in MMA.
|
theboss215 | 7 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Record since posting on covers:
8/11: NYY/TOR u9.5 -110 (58.9%) *Win* 8/11: Pittsburgh -173 ( 65.1%) *Loss* 8/10: Col/SF o7 -115 (59%) *Loss* 8/10: Pittsburgh -140 (61.4%) *Loss* 8/9: Baltimore -1 -135 (65.6%) *Loss* 8/8: COL/LAD o7 (60.4%) *Win* 8/8: WAS -1 -180 (70.4%) *Push* 8/7: CHC/SD o7 +107 (67.2%) *Win* 8/7: STL -1 -140 (67.9%) *Loss* 8/7: CHW -1 -153 (68.4%) *Loss* 8/6: WAS -1 -155 (66.4%) *Push* 8/6: CHW -1 -163 (69%) *Win* 8/5: NYY -184 (65.3%) *Win* 8/5: Atlanta -235 (70.7%) *Win* 8/4: LA Dodgers -285 (74.4%) *Win* 8/4: Detroit -185 (69%) *Win* 8/3: Atlanta -255 (74.5%) *Win* 8/2: Boston -192 (68.5%) *Loss* 8/1: Cincinnati -175 (67.5%) *Win* 7/31: Milwaukee -230 (72.1%) *Win* 7/30: Milwaukee -180 (66.4%) *win* |
theboss215 | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Algorithm result for 8/4: Cincinnati -185 (66%) 5.0-3.6. Other highly rated plays are COL/SF o7.5 (62.9%) 5.2-3.7 and CIN/CHI u8 (58.6%). BOL, hopefully we return to winning, hit an awful skid the last few days. 8/12: COL/SF o7.5 (62.9%) 8/12: Cincinnati -185 (66%) |
theboss215 | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Algorithm result for 8/4: Pittsburgh (65.1%) 4.9- 3.3. They screwed us yesterday late but lightning seldom strikes twice. We have a total today, on NYY/TOR u9.5 -110 (58.9%). Other leans are: TB Rays (61.2%) 4.7-3.3 and Mil Brewers (65.2%) 6.0-3.4. BOL! 8/11: NYY/TOR u9.5 -110 (58.9%) 8/11: Pittsburgh -173 ( 65.1%) 8/10: Col/SF o7 -115 (59%) *Loss*
8/10: Pittsburgh -140 (61.4%) *Loss* 8/9: Baltimore -1 -135 (65.6%) *Loss* 8/8: COL/LAD o7 (60.4%) *Win* 8/8: WAS -1 -180 (70.4%) *Push* 8/7: CHC/SD o7 +107 (67.2%) *Win* 8/7: STL -1 -140 (67.9%) *Loss* 8/7: CHW -1 -153 (68.4%) *Loss* 8/6: WAS -1 -155 (66.4%) *Push* 8/6: CHW -1 -163 (69%) *Win* 8/5: NYY -184 (65.3%) *Win* 8/5: Atlanta -235 (70.7%) *Win* 8/4: LA Dodgers -285 (74.4%) *Win* 8/4: Detroit -185 (69%) *Win* 8/3: Atlanta -255 (74.5%) *Win* 8/2: Boston -192 (68.5%) *Loss* 8/1: Cincinnati -175 (67.5%) *Win* 7/31: Milwaukee -230 (72.1%) *Win* 7/30: Milwaukee -180 (66.4%) *win* |
theboss215 | 4 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
UFC Lightweight Championship
Benson Henderson -200 vs Frankie Edgar +165 We're laying the 200 with Ben Hendo. Hendo controlled the fight in the first with better striking and octagon control. Dana White has been pressing Edgar to drop to 145, but with the roll he has been on beating Sherk, Penn and Maynard he hasn't needed to heed that advice. After this beating he will drop down. Hendo is just too big, strong, and athletic for Edgar in this one. There will be no comeback, I'm calling for Hendo by decision. Pick: Hendo -200 Cerrone vs Guillard These two were former training partners at Jackson's MMA. Guillard is the more explosive athlete overall, but has made more mental mistakes than any other active fighter currently in the UFC. Guillard made mistakes and lost to Joe Stevenson, Joe Lauzon, and Jim Miller. He recently beat Camoes, but was throwing one shot at a time, and employing that strategy is going to be picked apart by the striking of Cowboy. At some point in round one Guillard will make a mistake, Cowboy will get him to the floor and finish this via submission. Pick: Cowboy -300 Justin Lawrence vs Max Holloway Lawrence is a sound kickboxer, but Holloway is a nasty boxer who likes to press the action and fight in tight spaces, employing knees and elbows in a very unpredictable standup attack. Neither fighter will look to go to the ground in this one, due to style I'm giving the edge to Holloway, who looks to work the body of his opponent, as opposed to Lawrence who just looks for the homerun. Pick: Holloway -115 Ken Stone vs Erik Perez This is the type of pricepoint/situation we look for. With Greg Jackson in his corner we're taking a look at the ever evolving Erik Perez. He didnt pull an upset in the Ultimate Fighter 15 finale with the arm triangle, he was the better trained, better coached fighter. Stone is a guy who is trying to get back on track after sadistic beatings by Wineland and Jorgensen. He rebounded for 2 consecutive wins coming into this one, but against lesser opponents. He's not making it out of this one intact. Pick: Perez -115 |
theboss215 | 7 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Smith4722: Take S.Carolina in a 6 point teaser with bama -5 Wow, that's a good play. I'll bet this.
|
jbles88 | 27 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Algorithm result for 8/4: Pittsburgh (61.4%) 5.4- 3.8. It's currently available at -140. We also have a decent looking total today, on Col/SF o7 -115 (59%). Other leans are: SF Giants (60%) 5.0-4.2, but at -225 it's too much chalk for Lincecum, plus with the total rated so high he will be responsible for some damage as well. Boston Red Sox and LA Dodgers are both just under 60%, we would only consider betting these on the -1 runline. 8/10: Col/SF o7 -115 (59%) 8/10: Pittsburgh -140 (61.4%) 8/9: Baltimore -1 -135 (65.6%) *Loss* 8/8: COL/LAD o7 (60.4%) *Win* 8/8: WAS -1 -180 (70.4%) *Push* 8/7: CHC/SD o7 +107 (67.2%) *Win* 8/7: STL -1 -140 (67.9%) *Loss* 8/7: CHW -1 -153 (68.4%) *Loss* 8/6: WAS -1 -155 (66.4%) *Push* 8/6: CHW -1 -163 (69%) *Win* 8/5: NYY -184 (65.3%) *Win* 8/5: Atlanta -235 (70.7%) *Win* 8/4: LA Dodgers -285 (74.4%) *Win* 8/4: Detroit -185 (69%) *Win* 8/3: Atlanta -255 (74.5%) *Win* 8/2: Boston -192 (68.5%) *Loss* 8/1: Cincinnati -175 (67.5%) *Win* 7/31: Milwaukee -230 (72.1%) *Win* 7/30: Milwaukee -180 (66.4%) *win* |
theboss215 | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
You GOT to stick to a money management system. Most people bet wayyyy too much.
|
yoyojonas | 9 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
RUN LINE = SHIT
|
renick23 | 30 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by DanTos8715: I'm intrigued. Not hating, but it doesn't really take a computer to take the biggest favorites on the board. Winning is all we care about really. I've had friends that had paid a "professional handicapper" to receive "daily picks" before. How well do you think that ended?
|
theboss215 | 12 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
5dimes giving the -1 runline is pretty clutch...it's terrific value and although with betting I would hate to use a word like "safe", it is a safer play overall.
|
theboss215 | 12 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
My partner and myself have been using a mathematical algorithm ( Typically, when an algorithm is associated with processing information, data is read from an input source, written to an output device, and/or stored for further processing. Stored data is regarded as part of the internal state of the entity performing the algorithm.) in choosing my mlb plays and it's been hitting at a high clip over the past few days, 26-3, so we've decided to start posting the plays on here and another website's forum.
I know it does spit out a lot of chalk favorites, but winning IS winning, and thats all that really matters in this game. Let's make money together !!!
The Algorithm result for 8/5: Chicago White Sox (69%) 5.9-3.5. But at a price of -225 we are going to bet this game on the -1 runline priced at -163 at 5dimes and that's what I'll rate the play at as far as our tracking goes. A play that we would consider at the -1.5 runline is Washington (66.4%) as our formula has them outscoring Houston by over 2 runs tonight (5.9-3.5). Personally I'm going to bet it at -1 -155 at 5dimes so that's what I'm rating it at. On a side note: I personally like the NYY +1 +100 tonight. I think it's good value personally, the algorithm has the Yankees losing by exactly one run meaning that at this price it's at worst case a push, and it's currently - $ for the +1.5 RL. 8/6: WAS -1 -155 (66.4%) 8/6: CHW -1 -163 (69%) 8/5: NYY -184 (65.3%) *Win* 8/5: Atlanta -235 (70.7%) *Win* 8/4: LA Dodgers -285 (74.4%) *Win* 8/4: Detroit -185 (69%) *Win* 8/3: Atlanta -255 (74.5%) *Win* 8/2: Boston -192 (68.5%) *Loss* 8/1: Cincinnati -175 (67.5%) *Win* 7/31: Milwaukee -230 (72.1%) *Win* 7/30: Milwaukee -180 (66.4%) *win* |
theboss215 | 12 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
glef, please - just bet your regular unit size on the games. What we hoped to do was create a system that can go 60%. What were getting is better, but just bet your regular units per game.
|
theboss215 | 7 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Their mostly chalk bets though, so tread carefully. A sharp thing to do might be to bet the plays at a pricepoint of -1 on the runline, that way if they lose you dont get murdered. That's what I've been doing for the prices over -200, and have been fortunate the teams have been winning by 2 or more runs. For Atlanta today 5dimes has them available at -1 -174, a bit more practical than the -235.
|
theboss215 | 7 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
My partner and myself have been using a mathematical algorithm ( Typically, when an algorithm is associated with processing information, data is read from an input source, written to an output device, and/or stored for further processing. Stored data is regarded as part of the internal state of the entity performing the algorithm.) in choosing my mlb plays and it's been hitting at a high clip over the past few days, 24-3, so we've decided to start posting the plays on here and another website's forum.
I know it does spit out a lot of chalk favorites, but winning IS winning, and thats all that really matters in this game. Let's make money together !!!
The Algorithm result for 8/4: Atlanta Braves (70.7%) 4.9- 3.0. But at a price of -235 I understand this game is nearly unbettable for a lot of you with the expense of the chalk. So our best play under a -200 price point is our 4th rated play: NYY (65.3%) 5.6- 4.3. We will also consider this a rated play and personally bet this. Other leans are: Detroit (68%) 5.7- 4.3, and Washington (69.3%) 5.2- 3.1. Also, we have been getting requests from people to "show them the algorithm". Im sorry, but I cant do that, its simply not practical. I'll show you the results here, but it'll realistically take a few hours of explaining to make someone understand and we simply dont have that type of time nor interest. 8/5: NYY -184 (65.3%) 8/5: Atlanta -235 (70.7%) 8/4: LA Dodgers -285 (74.4%) *Win* 8/4: Detroit -185 (69%) *Win* 8/3: Atlanta -255 (74.5%) *Win* 8/2: Boston -192 (68.5%) *Loss* 8/1: Cincinnati -175 (67.5%) *Win* 7/31: Milwaukee -230 (72.1%) *Win* 7/30: Milwaukee -180 (66.4%) *win* |
theboss215 | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.