Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by kkirby99: Most all books won't take correlated parlays i.e. Favorite to the over or Underdog to the under so the problem still exists since you can't split a parlay through 2 books. I understand that an online sportsbook won't let you to make both of the following bets on the same game: 1. Fave & Over 2. Dog & Under But what you are telling me is that an online sportsbook won't even let you make only one of the above bets (Either Bet #1 or Bet #2)? If this is the case, is there a specific spread/total percentage that prevents this from happening? If both of these are the case, the only way you could potentially play this system is via a local, correct? Thanks for the clarification, Str8 |
whitakp | 252 |
|
|
Hey everyone,
I just read through all of the 209 posts in this thread and I must say that this system play is very impressive. The reason I am posting is because of the countless posts I read through looking for an online sportsbook that would allow these bets (Fav/O & Dog/U). I understand that most, if not all, online sportsbooks do not allow this type of betting. However, my question is, for all of those who do not have access to locals or those who want to remain anonymous gamblers, can't you employ 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. separate online sportsbooks to accomplish this same task? For example, find two sportsbooks, A & B, with the same spread/totals for a specific game. Place one bet on one site and the other bet on the other. Therefore, you can place both bets online at the same spread/totals. I understand that it would take additional legwork (i.e. perusing multiple sports sites for similar spread/totals) and additional headaches (i.e. managing multiple accounts), but for some pretty serious moolah, I wouldn't mind putting in the extra effort. I have not actually tried to implement this practice using this system, but I couldn't help but thinking that this would be a simple solution to the ongoing problem...in addition, you might even be able to find more advantageous combinations (i.e. Fav/O & Dog/U) by using multiple sites... Has anyone done this and is it possible? Thanks everyone, Str8 |
whitakp | 252 |
|
|
Monster 1511 - If you want an analysis of my picks, check out my blog on here...it was too long to post, so instead of separating my picks out, I put it on my blog instead. Sorry for the extra leg work.
Alkrygow - Yes, I do have a lot of +'s there...however, if you check out my blog, I think I provide a good enough explanation as to why I am choosing them. If I don't, then I need to improve my handicapping...which be evident based upon this weeks's performance. tHiZZLe - I don't care enough to go through the process of setting up a new account just so I wouldn't have to live down the picks I made. And don't you have better things to be doing than burning someone on here just for making some selections? W/e, I digress. |
str8sprouts | 9 |
|
|
TB +14
STL +14 WAS +7 NYJ +7 ***Please provide feedback and input as your thoughts are much appreciated. Happy Holidays and GLE. |
str8sprouts | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.