Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
thanks guys
|
spaceship10 | 3 |
|
|
ive got the same problem (see rodgers in the rain). eli looks pretty solid but ive got nelson/rodgers duo messing with my head. im trying to double dip.
|
chzcake01 | 4 |
|
|
ive got aaron rodgers and jordy nelson starting tonight. do i play them in the rain (no wind), or start big ben against the jags? thursday night games are always squirly and tonight looks to be the same. we got an under radar minn running attack/defensive unit vs a public team coming off a bkowout win with a below avg defensive unit. your expertise is appreciated!!
|
spaceship10 | 3 |
|
|
seeing that u dont have too many options maybe you go for the hail mary. the pats have no idea whos getting the ball where/when. last week mulligan got the first td rec of the gm. i guess hillman is the choice assuming denver decides to to so. bolden is a complete crap shot. then again jacobs is starting tonight. opposite garbage always happens on these thur nite games.
|
sixers33 | 6 |
|
|
williams against washington is better than the RB debacle in new england or roddys busted ankle
|
Kusala | 3 |
|
|
any other RBs on waivers? if not id say hillman.
|
sixers33 | 6 |
|
|
you can always pick up a solid matchup QB on waivers. trade for a decent RB if you can. even if you just have to pick up a different RB each week on the waiver wire. check out atl RBs or saints RBs (just a crap shot) but stay away from stl and pats RBs. GL
|
Absolutxedge22 | 11 |
|
|
pretty good team. its easy to pick up a QB like dont laugh, eli, tony romo, pryor/smith. it just depends on how deep your league is (8,10,14 tms?). the main thing is that your WRs are solid as well as TE. even your D is solid. you can trade up but ive tried to trade in my league but no one ever bites. ive got TE gonzo, antonio brown, eddie lacy, brady, nicks, jeffery, and gordon. i was even trying to get rid of trich but i know hes not as valuable as he was on draft day.
|
Absolutxedge22 | 11 |
|
|
smith and washington. austins got too much competition and a shady o-line. if you miss its on smith against min 329 pass yds allowed and washington gets targeted a bunch with staford throwing to him. miller doesnt seem to get enough rec to knock off a WR. well GL
|
governor410 | 4 |
|
|
damn i got the same problem. i definitely would love to start gronk but just it being the first game back i see a td with minimal yds at best (35 yds/ 1td).
the safest: blackmon, garçon, and smith. the sexiest: gordon, smith, and blackmon. since you got graham id go sexiest.
|
uclalumnus | 3 |
|
|
standard league points. gonna use 2WR and a WR for the flex position.
randall cobb torrey smith hakeem nicks antonio brown josh gordon alshon jeffery i really like cobb, smith, and jeffery/nicks but thursday nights have been below average for passing yardage. just wondering if anyone has an angle thanks!
|
spaceship10 | 1 |
|
|
im in a standard scoring league. i also have hakeem nicks on my bench to pair with manning if necessary. im just thinking somehow the jets get blown out 38-3 with no receiving corps on thursday night football. plus the books like brady them by 12 or so. easiest money in the world or a am i gonna get fucked by brady again???
|
spaceship10 | 2 |
|
|
yo- we've all been there before; trying to fade our own picks to make some cash. try looking for the one bet on the board you just cant see losing. go opposite. next look for the one bet you just couldnt ever take (ie. its "just too risky") or ever see anyone laying $ on. then take it. for a smaller amout of course. when all else fail just fade the pick and roll best bets artice every day. especially when the dude goes 2-0 the day before or when his plays line up with yours. good luck son n play within ur means
|
fademeandwin | 66 |
|
|
ats the suns got gsw number. only one meeting this year but suns were at home. im biting on +4. shitassface!!
|
spaceship10 | 14 |
|
|
hahaha actionjunk! it was weird cause one night at work she came into our workplace. i was like hey u look familiar. kinda pointless story but it was cool.
|
spaceship10 | 14 |
|
|
im wondering if any of these teams have any 2h tendencies. i know pho is shady in the 2h but looking for info on scoring/covering trends. trying to look it up right now but i know someone out there in coversland has a feel for one or both of these teams. the help is much appreciated. thanks
|
spaceship10 | 14 |
|
|
or what if brady gets over 25.5 as well as flacco gets 19.5? i know the books are always a step ahead but either way its a win. its also in typing "brady over ...." its not like a pats +7 instead of -7. its well documented that it should read -7. im a gonna try for 1/2 a unit and im sure ill come out a loser.
|
spaceship10 | 4 |
|
|
aahh. sounds about right. but what if flacco gets over 19.5. couldnt the arguement be it was a bet placed in a wrong box. ive wanted a certain over but checked under because i was in a rush. the ober hit but when i looked it was in print that i placed a "wrong" bet. im assuming everythings automated so the bet number corresponds to a certain persons stat or team total. im hoping its one of those unexplained wagers that hit because it was some random typo error. last week i found a team total that was 5 points lower than what it should be. needless to say the team scored way over anyway but it was a casher. probably wishful hoping but a signs a sign.
|
spaceship10 | 4 |
|
|
seems like theres a switch between flaccos n bradys total completions. my books got flacco at 25.5 and brady at 19.5. through some research ive seen flacco at 19.5 and brady at 25.5. brady at 25.5 seems a little more like it. if brady gets 23 completions and my book chalks it up as a loss but the bet says "brady tot comp over 19.5," shouldnt i get the win? its not like a team total thats wrong and is obviously a typo. well i hope he gets at least 20 so we can find out.
|
spaceship10 | 4 |
|
|
im still gonna lose my other bets. just one second of glory till i lose my under 1h and ore team total 49.5. shit!
|
spaceship10 | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.