Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
some other loser called marksteg22 created an almost identical thread except that moron says he bet 200,000 to 500.000 a game. its amazing, just when i thought i have already met the stupidest person alive 2 new contenders appear, marksteg22 and IamThebook
|
IamTHEbook | 115 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by marksteg22:
Guys i have inside info on NBA games from Vegas. believe me. my guy in vegas dated David Stern's niece in high school. i have 100% guaranteed winners from my dude when. this happens about once ever week or every other 3rd monday in march. I personally do not think it is always 100% even tho every time he told me it was a guarantted winner it has hit. that has been 14 times this year so far. so idn i like my odds. i usually only put 50-70k on his LOCKS but that is because the economy is bad. i have 3 plays all 200-500k bets and guaranteed to go at least 3 out of 3. start following me and you will see what i mean. Theres always that one chance he will give me the Guaranteed winner so if that happens that will most likely be a 700 k bet, my local bookie allows me to buy as many points as i want so i can get the best line. I sometimes buy a couple points on games to give my bookie more juice.
600 thousand to 1.5 million in bets and you take the time to post on a sports forum, as i stated earlier, fuckin loser |
marksteg22 | 36 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by marksteg22:
Guys i have inside info on NBA games from Vegas. believe me. my guy in vegas dated David Stern's niece in high school. i have 100% guaranteed winners from my dude when. this happens about once ever week or every other 3rd monday in march. I personally do not think it is always 100% even tho every time he told me it was a guarantted winner it has hit. that has been 14 times this year so far. so idn i like my odds. i usually only put 50-70k on his LOCKS but that is because the economy is bad. i have 3 plays all 200-500k bets and guaranteed to go at least 3 out of 3. start following me and you will see what i mean. Theres always that one chance he will give me the Guaranteed winner so if that happens that will most likely be a 700 k bet, my local bookie allows me to buy as many points as i want so i can get the best line. I sometimes buy a couple points on games to give my bookie more juice.
i agree you will definetly win me money because i will bet the opposite of you on every play. your phone is ringing its your manager at burger king seeing if you can work the overnight shift for the drivethru, fuckin loser |
marksteg22 | 36 |
|
|
very true, i thought the Jets would get smoked
|
allamir | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by icover4u:
Minnesota versus New Orleans = winner = Minnesota Chargers versus Colts = winner = colts Superbowl 44 winner Colts
I can almost guarentee it
holy shit am i stupid, i thought the jets were playing the colts, people owe me money on my san diego bet from last week then, i guess i should go collect |
icover4u | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:
Your right, finally, there is nothing to debate, your a joke! What do I do to attract idiots like you?
Bol on your picks this weekend, I do look at your posts because you are not bad picking games but the one thing i notice is that you critisize anyone elses comments that go aginst you and you become personal. There is nothing wrong with anybody trying to defend their reasons for a pick and that is what is great about this site. You do tend to insult people if they dont agree with you, You did this alot in your previous thread with some other guy and it got crazy.You say what do i do to attract idiots? You seem to start alot of the problems, Just an observation and I am sure you will now attack me too, remember all I am doing here is answering your question |
URISS2302 | 118 |
|
|
best of luck UNC i am all over the same, time for the Jets to crash and burn
|
UNCforever | 187 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cappin2win10:
i could easily see you flopping on both those unc. has peyton really been playing that well? i mean he has 17 ints so far this season. when they turn it over...jets will ram it down their throat. and use clock. can u see the colts defense stopping the running attack? and minny has the better defense here. they will try to bother brees as much as possible but they have just as good as cornerbacks imo.
Cappin, keep in mind when you mention turnovers that for the first 15 weeks of the season when the colts were trying they only allowed 1 touchdown after a turnover all year long so Mannings interceptions never hurt them, the jets ramming it down their throat is a little extreme since better offensive teams couldn't |
UNCforever | 187 |
|
|
good point urban. and you did not even mention collie or garcon |
Urban | 5 |
|
|
allamir, nice call yesterday on Indy and after watching the favorites play yesterday and am starting to agree more on San Diego
|
allamir | 90 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Sportsmind:
thanks sportsmind best of luck to you this weekend |
allamir | 90 |
|
|
Do you have any leans on the Arizona game
|
allamir | 90 |
|
|
I agree with these picks. Indy and San Diego really are better teams and should win. San Diego is actually my best bet this round. Jets really are shitty. Gl with your picks and thanks for the advice
|
allamir | 90 |
|
|
alabama will open at -10.5 and the total will be 43.5
at game time alabama will be -12.5
based on Texas play the last 2 weeks TCU deserves to be in the BCS championship game |
Zoot | 51 |
|
|
nice football picks tonight rat
|
Rat_Fink | 728 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rat_Fink: c'mon rat, that comment is rediculous, rothlisberger is a great qb and you feel confident that they have a better chance with a guy who has not had a regular season start, that is just crazy, Dixon will be scared in the beginning with what baltimore will throw at him but he will settle down, the only thing better with dixon is the point you can now get 8.5-9 and as we know pittsburgh can score on defence and in what should be a close defensive battle, the large points is a huge bonus but other than dixons mother no one can feel more confident with him starting. i have heard that ben will be dressed and the number 3 qb tonight but in a close game we could see him get action so again the extra points is a bonus and don't be shocked if ben does see action if indeed he does dress
******************************************* Late Sunday Card. . . . . . . . ******************************************* Getting my ass whomped on the BIG plays. . . . . . . . . Fade or play . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Units Steelers +8.5 7 Units Steelers / Ravens OVER 34.5 5 Units Steelers ML +310
Plus.....if interested. 3 Units Sac. Kings -4 3 Units Minn. T'Wolves +14.5 I actuallly feel MORE confident in these plays without Roethlisberger than if he were playing. ........I'm not kidding. See you tomorrow...7pm sharp tomorrow. ~ Rat Fink ~ |
Rat_Fink | 728 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rat_Fink: c'mon rat, that comment is rediculous, rothlisberger is a great qb and you feel confident that they have a better chance with a guy who has not had a regular season start, that is just crazy, Dixon will be scared in the beginning with what baltimore will throw at him but he will settle down, the only thing better with dixon is the point you can now get 8.5-9 and as we know pittsburgh can score on defence and in what should be a close defensive battle, the large points is a huge bonus but other than dixons mother no one can feel more confident with him starting. i have heard that ben will be dressed and the number 3 qb tonight but in a close game we could see him get action so again the extra points is a bonus and don't be shocked if ben does see action if indeed he does dress
******************************************* Late Sunday Card. . . . . . . . ******************************************* Getting my ass whomped on the BIG plays. . . . . . . . . Fade or play . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Units Steelers +8.5 7 Units Steelers / Ravens OVER 34.5 5 Units Steelers ML +310
Plus.....if interested. 3 Units Sac. Kings -4 3 Units Minn. T'Wolves +14.5 I actuallly feel MORE confident in these plays without Roethlisberger than if he were playing. ........I'm not kidding. See you tomorrow...7pm sharp tomorrow. ~ Rat Fink ~ |
Rat_Fink | 728 |
|
|
One thing i hate the most about this site is the name calling and insults that go on here, its like being in grade 8. the bottom line is that some picks will win and some will lose, there are some strong cappers on here and simon is one of them, i am sure he has helped just as many people out to win money and likely more than they have lost from his picks. everyone needs to learn that when someone releases a pick it is your responsibillity to research the pick and find out any additional information and it is out there. you just need to find it. as i mentioned earlier and i never bashed you on your pick simon. i only suggested that you should have advised the others that this pick should have seriously been downgraded from a poy in light of the warner information coming out, i am sure the serious gambler would respect you more for saying that, but lets get serious bashers. there is no point in insulting or just being rude, make your opinions heard but try and have class doing it, there are 100's of forums weekly with guys posting there picks, some help us make money and some don't thats life ans if someone wants to create a buzz about their picks then that is there perogative, all businesses do it and it can be a good thing sometimes. another thing to learn is that if somone has been hot chances are it won't last forever, use your own ability to make choices, don't let others sway your picks, in most cases they dont work out or none of us would have to work, we could all live off gambling winnings, Simon, I look forward to seeing more picks from you in the future because as I said you are solid, lets just call today a muligan
|
SimonSezSo | 288 |
|
|
simonsezso i respect anyone who posts their picks because they open themselves up to a lot of abuse when they lose and trust me more lose than win but i have to question your handicapping ability when a player as pivitol as warner does not play and it is not known by you, you can say it does not matter with leinart but c'mon man it clearly does. after seeing the hit on warner last week and hearing the prognoses you have to know that he may not be as on as he usually is even if he plays, i really feel bad for all those people that lost money that they don;t have because someone comes out with all this big "game of the year stuff", i am sure you swayed many betters to trust in your pick and follow you, but whats worse is that when you found out warner would not start you should have at least had the balls to advise these followers that you may not be as confident as you once were and you are retracting your goy status because you missed a huge faxtor with no warner, if he had played i strongly feel you were on the right track. now i know your next comment will be that i am a moron with so few posts but what that actually says is that i have better things to do with my time other than posting but i felt like making a comment here and that is you shoulda manned up ans told people to avoid the bet now in light of the injury, that would have .shown me more about you than if you won this bet, i wish you all luck in the second half with the over but it looks like you will need spme defensive breaks as well as both offences puuting up some points. This is not in any way bashing the pick and you obviously win more often than lose but as i said you shoulda said you were wrong and overlooked a huge difference maker in the game. good luck to all of you |
SimonSezSo | 288 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by starwink:
10 posts since 2008? You created the plng alias for this stupid tout scheme?
No actually it means that my life isn't spent posting like you moron. You have posted 8000 times in 4 years, thats 2000 a year, 175 per month, fuck are you ever a loser, get a life dork and spend less time on your computer, what a complete idiot |
Rat_Fink | 728 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.