Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
"TT" means Team Total. You are referring to Game Total. Just trying to help a brother out.
|
Wannatobet | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Shaner2003: bulls put up atleast 90, different style offense with augustine at point DJ has been laying a lot at PG lately with Hinrich out, and Bulls offense has been bad.
|
ricro | 3 |
|
|
What Bob said...action is pretty even on SA/GS. If you're looking for a fade-the-public pick on TNT Thursday action, the play would be Chi +13.
I like GS in this spot. At home, Spurs playing in Pho last night, fourth road game in 6 days, and no Parker. Often doesn't work out when everything seems to be pointing towards a particular team, but I'm putting a midsize wager on GS. This doesn't smell so bad as to be a trap game; if it was a Pick Em I'd be more worried. And the even action gives me some comfort as well that it's not a Vegas special. My play of the night is Bulls TT Under 90.5.
|
wildhooks88 | 27 |
|
|
Bulls average 90.5 on the road for the season, which obviously includes games with Rose. They are averaging 84.4 points in their last 5 games. When you factor in an above-average OKC defense and a little fatigue factor from playing a late game in Houston last night, the numbers say the Bulls should score between 80-85 points.
|
ricro | 3 |
|
|
Not sure the Bulls will be able to play as good of defense tonight coming off late game with Rockets. But don't want to take over because Bulls offense is so bad.
So I'm going large on Bulls Under 90.5. Bulls average 90.5 on the road for the season, which obviously includes games with Rose. They are averaging 84.4 points in their last 5 games. When you factor in an above-average OKC defense, the numbers say the Bulls should score between 80-85 points.
|
Covers | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HoustonSports: I am just curious as to how you can be a fan of any team and ever place a wager 95% of the time if I am going to bet on a game involving one of my favorite teams, it will be AGAINST them. The so-called "victory tax"...either way you get some level of satisfaction from the outcome.
|
lookingtowin | 29 |
|
|
replied to
Umm, so I have a new worst beat Moose with Miami OH +26/ Ball St +16 Teaser!!!
in College Football
And I thought losing my +9 and Under 73 was bad...
|
Bluejay50 | 13 |
|
|
I'm now a fan of WHOEVER plays N.Ill. Hope they lose em all. Hope they get crushed every time.
|
Crashdavis565 | 20 |
|
|
I will root against N. Ill against every game they ever play for the rest of eternity. Worst ever.
|
Fademeuwin | 252 |
|
|
What a load of garbage. All they had to do was kneel it. Karma has a way of finding payback in the form of an ACL.
|
GQStatus | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TorontoJoey:
Jerry won us 3 Bowls in 4 years. That was back when he let his head coach (Jimmy Johnson) evaluate players, draft, and pick his staff. So you are basically proving the OP's point. |
PoleShiftTime | 9 |
|
|
Like Daran said, it makes me nervous that all the fades are road teams. A lot of the Hilton square picks are road favorites that go down playing in someone else's stadium, and the picks didn't give enough credit for home field.
|
LeRinkRat | 98 |
|
|
My rules of thumb: If you have doubled your bankroll or your weekly allowance, pull out half of the profits from that week (you start with $1,000, are up to $2,000, pull out $500). Leave the other half in there to cover eventual downturn. Treat each week separately. It's ok to up your bets a reasonable amount if you've won early in the week or early in the day. But once MNF is over, go back to your standard wagers. Don't "let it ride" by upping your standard starting wagers into the next week, unless you have at least tripled your starting bankroll/allowance AFTER pulling out weekly cheese.
|
AFNfootballnerd | 68 |
|
|
Classic! Buying a 1/2 point to get it down to 16. LOLZ.
|
PokinSmot | 487 |
|
|
Those peckerheads in Philly better SLOW down!!
|
phixer | 1054 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jtoler: True RLM deals with money percentages not number of bets percentages. You're proving the point. When a lot of the public is on one side, yet the line moves opposite of that, it can be an indicator that sharps are going the other way and Vegas is moving the line so they don't get cleaned out by the large sharp bets. So the percentages are often a critical piece of information. Nothing is guaranteed...nothing in gambling ever is. But to ignore it is foolish. You were dismissing the line going down last night when the Packers were a giant public favorite. Like I said, it doesn't work every time, but it a factor that should be considered.
|
Roboduck | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Professional_92: rockets blazer over 207 bro |
khmerkid | 63 |
|
|
By everyone, you mean 32%?
|
Irish_14 | 4 |
|
|
replied to
No Such Things As Locks But This Play MONDAY NIGHT Comes Real Close To Being One Babyyyyy!
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Macotosdaghost:
Quote Originally Posted by LoveMeSomeMe: Question? Where can you find the "public" percentages? I see a lot of people on the forum talk about this and I don't know where to get that information. |
AlphaandOmega | 46 |
|
|
Why not throw $200 on Bears. That way you still win a little something for hitting the first 5 games, but still have a decisive position to sweat.
|
atlanta30 | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.