Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
"He doesn't give a shit about the jockeys and barn employees. Racing is not an "essential" business & I'm amazed they haven't been shut down" Well if it gets shut down then they will have plenty of time to go to the grocery store and get exposed to exponentially more people. Lol |
Midnight1 | 8 |
|
|
Only one common opponent but I watched each team play the Badgers. I am going to give a sniff with the points. Good call |
slanteye | 17 |
|
|
Utah is averaging 107.6 with Gobert out.
Over 202
|
rbd042 | 1 |
|
|
This is a huge value at 54.5. Both teams layed eggs earlier this year against tough SEC defenses. This dragged down the total. Last 3 years they avg 70.7 per game. Two below average defenses and State and Fitz can score.
|
rbd042 | 5 |
|
|
Can anyone shed some light on why this line is going up? Neither offense has really done much. What is the catch here?
|
rbd042 | 1 |
|
|
Spurs Hawks OVER! 1-1 so far
|
tryn2makeabuck | 106 |
|
|
This seems like a good one to watch from the start. If they are hot early, go In-Game Under heavy.
|
norednumbers | 6 |
|
|
Over the last 2 months I have been betting the live under at the end of the 3rd quarter on games in which one team is up by 15 or more. I am 14-4 on those. Anyone else do the live unders? Is this something anyone else has had success with?
|
rbd042 | 2 |
|
|
I agreed at first. Watched the replay after. It would have been very contested and at that point in the game its no blood no foul. Had he gotten it to Koenig it would have been different.
|
ballerbooboo | 2 |
|
|
Hope you are right.
|
zgreg7 | 2 |
|
|
They average 7 points a game less when he is out, yet the total did not drop. Any ideas. Almost looks to good to be true.
|
rbd042 | 2 |
|
|
This was suck a lock. Thought it was a trap. Notre Dame should have been 6-8 point faves. Seriously Wichita would have been a 9-9/10-8 team in the ACC
|
nmw2486 | 35 |
|
|
Why are they underdogs? They should be -120 minimum. Something is very fishy in this one.
|
Jakegoal | 7 |
|
|
If you are using MoneyGram the book doesn't care whose name is on the moneygram. All they care about is the reference number so they can pick up the money. |
brooklyndondada | 11 |
|
|
Nice start to the conference tourney season!! Way to go Radford. Whatever your nickname is. |
KingScorpio | 30 |
|
|
This is a Sagarin Line. VMI 64.5 and Radford is 60. Add the 3.5 for home court and you get 8. That is why the line is 8. Great value play here if you trust the outcome of the first 2 games. |
KingScorpio | 30 |
|
|
I was there for that game and I had a handful of people give me money to bet on the Badgers. Most of us were poor recent college grads and I had 2k wagers on the Badgers from that group. I can't even begin to put a number on the amount of cash that was wagered by the Wisconsin fans. The buzz about wagers was crazy. I knew some of the people I placed the wagers for might not believe me that the wagers were a push so I had the sportsbook give me a copy of the Nevada gaming guideline that showed a game had to go 55 minutes. They had to wake up the manager to find out were that copies of the info on the all was located. Then they had security escort me to the door. It was at the Hilton and I was pararded through the casino in my Wisconsin garb on my way to the door. Which was ridiculous because I didnt do anything. Guess they wanted to make an example of me. It was a fun night nevertheless. |
pj702 | 14 |
|
|
I received picks from them back in 2008. Bought a month subscription during college Football. Was 3-9. Never again will I try that. |
jfivefox | 3 |
|
|
Alabama State finished 9-1. Maybe the best team in the conference at this time. IMO
|
Elstarko | 2 |
|
|
If conferences mean a ton, then you should lean toward Louisville. Big East was 48% vs. FBS teams, CUSA was 33%. I agree the big east is down, but CUSA is still a step below. I think the only quality win for the conference was Tulsa winning at Notre Dame.
|
TRAIN69 | 36 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.