Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
diver gets mad when you hijack his thread and make your own pics in it. so that is what I do.
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
flagg owning today, hope you guys tailed me on uconn
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
1-1 today still up 10,000,000,000$$
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
yeah up 55 billion, the possibilites are endless
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
FLAGG ROLLIN
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
UCONN -5
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by randall_flagg: ADDING: UCONN -5 (55,000,000,000*) 1-0 today + 55,000,000,000
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dpb123007: You guessed it...... 2nd half Bisons +4.5 -115. Same size play as 1st half wager. Because it looks so damn easy to take the Sooners 2nd half. Except when you look closer at the 1st half stats, ND State has shot the ball at 62% vs the Sooners 33%, been to the line 4 times vs. only one time for the Sooners and they have outrebounded the Sooners 16-9 on the defensive glass. The only reason the Sooners have more OFF rebounds is because of their long 3's. GL to ya. looking at the stats i would lean ou, because shooting pct. usually comes back to normal range in the 2nd half, so i would say ou shoots better fg% 2nd half.
|
dpb123007 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by collegegambler: ou just launching threes and play no D. yeah that is their style, but they can score 8 pts in 30 secs. so im not too worried
|
dpb123007 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by harry87: YEah it really looks like the Sooners are in control. nice 9-0 run by the bison its a 40 min game son
|
dpb123007 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dpb123007: Yeah, and they could also be surprised by the play of ND State and lose by double digits here too. If this was such a layup for the Sooners, this line would not have been hanging at 3.5 to 4 and also would have started out at 5 or 6 points. I know that most people don't have a BIG school like Oklahoma losing to little known North Dakota State in the 1st round. They play in a weaker conference, but have the offense and defense that show they are a dominant force on the court. Love the surprise factor with fundamentally solid teams. Harvard. GL to ya. Im a sooners homer and watched 90% of their gms... trust me
|
dpb123007 | 46 |
|
|
going to be a 3pt party for sooners....they cover
|
dpb123007 | 46 |
|
|
ya sooners could win by 15 easily
|
dpb123007 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by holydiver: Going all in on a guaranteed win no doubt and will risk all that I can MICHIGAN (ML) -1800 (800,000,000,000*) but you probably only have 18$ so that should earn you a solid 1$
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by holydiver: Going all in on a guaranteed win no doubt and will risk all that I can MICHIGAN (ML) -1800 (800,000,000,000*) lol great pick, only laying 1800 to win 100
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AutoPilot:
ND St. for the upset...GL anyway |
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
ADDING:
UCONN -5 (55,000,000,000*) |
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
Adding Oklahoma -3 (45,000,000,000)
|
holydiver | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HuskerBoy: NYK..okay I have. It seems to me that the problem people have is with the amount of money Diver bets on a game. I agree that it's obviously not real. No one can bet that amount of money, it's not allowed. However, who cares? Who goes into a thread to see how much someone is wagering more so than what they're wagering on? It seems to me like he's doing pretty well. Yeah, the -500, -700 money line bets are ridiculous to a normal bettor but it seems like that's his style. Regardless I don't give a garbage, was just curious why people were getting crazy about it. If he bets a billion and u like it bet your normal $1000 (me) or $100, or $10. Who cares? counting -700 for record???
|
holydiver | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HuskerBoy: NYK..okay I have. It seems to me that the problem people have is with the amount of money Diver bets on a game. I agree that it's obviously not real. No one can bet that amount of money, it's not allowed. However, who cares? Who goes into a thread to see how much someone is wagering more so than what they're wagering on? It seems to me like he's doing pretty well. Yeah, the -500, -700 money line bets are ridiculous to a normal bettor but it seems like that's his style. Regardless I don't give a garbage, was just curious why people were getting crazy about it. If he bets a billion and u like it bet your normal $1000 (me) or $100, or $10. Who cares? uh... juice isnt figured in his totals, deceives intentionally
|
holydiver | 56 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.