Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
sports interaction poker has some f***in' issues too dude. I had some really similar shit happen to me on that, like you said betting low amounts just to try it out I was playing heads-up against this f***** and the first hand i get a straight and he has a flush (heads-up! for god's sakes). Next hand, i hit trips and he has a full house. I said fuck it, Im out of here. This shit is bullshit. Thats my sports interaction poker story |
Blanket | 25 |
|
|
good call johnny utah
|
Johny_Utah | 66 |
|
|
drudowns. That shit was fucking HILARIOUS
|
fartnsniff | 238 |
|
|
hoseybest. the guy's screen name is smitler, with an l. search that name in the search box and you should be able to find it.
|
therizz | 1158 |
|
|
kreatture, i completely agree with everything you said about the points i made. I totally respect what you said and i dont feel that you ripped into me at all. The point is to win units and so I am very glad that you brought those things to light. Some of those ideas you mentioned occurred to me after i wrote the post but i dont regret writing the post at all because i think it is very informative and it will make people believe in the runline blitz system even more. I am new to sports betting. I have only been betting on sports for the last couple of weeks, only a little bit longer than i have been writing posts in your and therizz's forum. Thanks for being respectful and for being very reasonable and informative with your reply to my post. Again, I welcome anything anyone has to say about my posts because i really just want to learn to make more money, so suggestions are always appreciated
Also, I am glad you opened up this discussion because i know people have questions and ideas about how to improve the system, and doing so helps all of us. |
kreatture | 515 |
|
|
Does anybody know which sportsbooks allow live bets for each quarter for the NBA? I have heard that diamond sportsbook has them. I am wondering which other sportsbooks have them?
|
kuenerson | 1 |
|
|
The criss-cross blitz system looks like an improvement to me, based on how you explained it, over the already great runline blitz system. I have a few different ideas to add to the discussion as well. Feel free to post any honest remarks to them. I have no problem with criticism of these ideas in the thread. My thinking is this:
If you are going to be using a chase system, then you are eventually going to get a win, which can recover all losses and still show a profit with progressive betting. So why even bet on negative odds? Why not bet on positive odds? Positive odds will have you bet less on each bet. You won't have to increase your bets nearly as much to still show a profit. It won't tie up as much of your bankroll etc. All these factors make it easier to run more than one betting system as well. So here are the two ways i am thinking that you and the rest of us could run a system betting on positive odds: Parlay the 1st and 2nd favorite and chase that. This may extend it to a 7 or maybe even 8 game chase in the worst case scenarios but most of the time i'm sure it will hit in less than 4. I haven't backtested it at all but i am just guessing. Another way to do it would be to have a top underdog system. Why not just chase the best underdog of the day? This puts us in a much better situation with the juice. Just my thoughts.... feel free to make any comments or suggestions about them |
kreatture | 515 |
|
|
whew! That was nice that Chicago won. Another victory for the system. One question though, why did you list the Colorado play for monday as G3 in the "game" column of your last posting (right after it says series #92)?
|
therizz | 1158 |
|
|
Ya, the Chicago play is tough to make today, after they got crushed yesterday. What happened?! Lol. Im tempted to lay off it after that, going against what i said yesterday, lol. But we'll see what happens.
|
therizz | 1158 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by therizz: Series Info 6/4 BOS (2, 102.6) @ bal (26, 97.3) = +24, +5.3 sd (3, 102.5) @ PHI (14, 100.7) = -11, -1.8 cle (24, 98.6) @ CWS(25, 98.0) = -1, -0.6 mil (12, 100.4) @ STL (4, 101.7) = +8, +1.3 Hard to get overly excited about any of these plays this go round, we will see how it goes.
It is hard to trust the system sometimes. But trusting the system will pay more in the long run (and probably in the short run as well) than trusting your gut or making personal plays will, in my opinion. So i say, trust it, and then revise it (add filters,etc.) if necessary. I like that that has been the approach you've been taking rizz |
therizz | 1158 |
|
|
I guess there are no picks for today? I love what you have been doing otherwise though rizz and others
|
therizz | 1158 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.