Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Really? How you figure that?
|
EazyFBaby | 29 |
|
|
They suck. Don't take the bonus. You'll never see your money again. Rollover requirement if ridiculous
|
t6rider | 3 |
|
|
I was told different. No payouts on deposits that recieved a freeplay bonus, unless a huge rollover is met. I can understand that, but then they tell me since I took the bonus with my first deposit, my whole account balance is subject to a rollover. $500 of my balance didn't even receive a bonus. So how is the $500 subject to a rollover... All I know is when I win with my local house, they pay me that week, subject to NO rollover. The local books here might bust you up if you no pay them what you loose but they won't screw you in the butt like betonline.. |
yourdaddyspice | 10 |
|
|
I've been following your write-ups for the past few weeks. You're analysis of the games and the teams are awesome. Went with the Eagles too, but after reading your analysis, I'm gonna dump more. Mahalo for a job well done JFox! Look forward to your Winnahs!! |
Jfox6546 | 79 |
|
|
The pineapple express. Some kind of storm making its way from hawaii. Novrthern california expecting some bad weather
|
omalleys | 11 |
|
|
Wish I read your thread sooner, I moneylined em for 1200 to win 500. My hands and toes are loosing skin as we speak!
|
gio66 | 6 |
|
|
Wanted to play Lakers buy that Miami 5-0 ats off loss scared me. G/L` |
jackmenis | 5 |
|
|
Does he have a few good plays? I mean does he win more than lose? I can pick my own loosers for free, Its the winners I want. Anyone know of a honest handicapper who wins?
|
kapuna | 4 |
|
|
Was just wondering how true those records of past performances really are. |
kapuna | 4 |
|
|
If I took my losses and not do the "chase", I think I'd be OK. Its when I lose 3 games in a row and panic sets in. This never works but the chase offers a form of entertainment that is fffed up if not ending in your favor.....Nothing, and I mean nothing makes you feel more alive than coming back from 10 grand and still making a profit...even shit smells nice.
|
lowboy64 | 27 |
|
|
Don't know who the girl is, just needed one to match all the other hot chicks used as avatars and she was the one. Anybody know her name?
|
kapuna | 19 |
|
|
I actually couldn't sleep after playing the hawks. Wanted to hedge my bet and go magic but was already maxed out for the game. Got lucky, normally wouldn't play them but those numbers that are too good to be true, well you know.
|
kapuna | 19 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by composite]
I put this in smartbets' thread. But I was curious what people thought. I don't normally think a losing game automatically means it was a "trap." It probably means I capped the game poorly. People on the other side of the bet were simply "right." But today's ORL-ATL game really makes me wonder whether oddsmakers try to trap games sometimes. First, the game started @ ORL -1. Books *had* to know that the "public" would pound Orlando. But what gets me is that supposedly should be "sharps" that should've pounded ATL. Hence, you get reverse line movement. Well, there wasn't enough ATL action. The line went from ORL -1 to ORL -5. It kept creeping up all the way until tipoff. Which meant that "sharps" were betting on ORL as well. Or just not enough of them were betting on ATL. Either way, books must've been getting flooded w/ lopsided ORL action. That's why the line kept going up. And if it were still going up by tipoff, that means they never got equal action. So was it a "trap" game? If not, then why open the line so low? wasn't easy to pull the trigger on this one, had a hard time sleeping last night after watching the number grow from +2.5 to 3 just minutes after I entered my play. on the Hawks. Good to know I wasn't the only one making the shit up.[/uote] |
composite | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kapuna:
Going with Hawks, this is a trap!! Told ya! |
kapuna | 19 |
|
|
Going with Hawks, this is a trap!!
|
kapuna | 19 |
|
|
Awesome analysis 44..Looks like a winner to me!
|
44-dimes | 148 |
|
|
SIXERS AND ORLANDO UNDER
|
cesare6t9 | 4 |
|
|
Toronto Raptors (-5)
|
WillBetAnything | 47 |
|
|
West Virginia (+3)
|
WillBetAnything | 47 |
|
|
houston texans (+3) bengals under (38) cleveland under (33) |
WillBetAnything | 60 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.