Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by lvecchio32: YOUR CRAZY! They are just getting bi@#TCH SLAPPED BY A SEC POWERHOUSE. BAMA SECOND HALF LARGE
Looks like to me ND is throwing the game.....plain and simple |
Covers | 225 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah: LOLOLOLOL! LMAO!!
O.K., admittedly, not a big college betting "fan" - but, just too many variables in this one.....
It's the S.E.C., right? Against a weak Notre Dame schedule? The game is in Miami?!?!?!? The only loss was against "Johnny Football" in Texas? Who did the "Dames Of Notre" beat????? USC?? C'mon man................ doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out...................... The Crimson Saban's by at least 20 - - point spread is 10 right now?!?!?!? You do the math...................... Crimson by a LOT - - I'm talkin' like 52-17 or something like that................................... |
Covers | 225 |
|
|
A&M
|
Covers | 119 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by eezmoney: You come in a close second to tulanebill for dumb@#@ of the thread!! He would be stupid not to go for two! Spurrier is one of the top college football coaches of his era. That comment if almost as ignorant as being CRANKY after seeing a couple mispelled pronouns and adjectives!! At least your stupid comment was pertaining to sports!!
And for those that don't know Spurrier by now! He knows the spread and will do what the Vegas folks tell him to. He really f@$k the ones that backed his team! Who would go for the two point conversion with 11 seconds to go? Look at the LSU game. He went fourth down for a td with little time left instead of kicking a field goal. He was down 10 points! Normal coaches would have kicked a field goal and try to go for the onside kick and score a td later. You guys don't think these guys know the spread? Another game was on 10/2011 when they played against Miss St. They were up by 4 points and the spread was SC -3. He told his qb to run around in their end zone to get a safety and win only by 2 points. That Spurrier is a dirty behind mofo!!! Yes, he fixes the outcome of the game in front of your eyes!!! He would even sell his own mamma if he has to!!! |
Covers | 95 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tulanebill: LOL!! Are you serious! Your post is about a couple typos. Are you disgruntal english teacher. I know how to spell. I posted that at 5 a.m. after playing poker all night. As if i really need to explain to you why my grammar wasn't proper! Who cares other than you! This is a sports thread stupid. Not a thesis paper! I was going to make a couple more error's on purpose. Just so i could laugh at you again when you point it out! Go watch "Dead Poets Society" and pull on your little ding dong! LMAO!!! Wow
I'm really in a cranky mood today....reading these comments about the outlook for the game is very difficult when you are constantly sidetracked by irritation over "since" for '"sense," "there" for "their," "better" for "bettor," and so on and so on. |
Covers | 95 |
|
|
Really thats being generous..... Gators by 3tds + |
Covers | 95 |
|
|
I totally agree with imaxfil, about the mismatches in these bowls. I am still amazed that Clemson got the win over LSU. The refs helped them as much as they could. Just like with Michigan yesterday. But, Clowney took matters into his own hands after the refs ripped them off! Long story short. What imaxfli said!! I rarely post on covers. I just try to get some insight into the games like most on here. Combato i appreciate your opinion. I would love to know how your system works! I have only agreed with you on a few games. I saw you on here yesterday boistering about your bowl record when most of those picks were not good! They got lucky to cover. TCU for example ! I aprreciate your insight, but doesn't make complete since. It does make some since, which is alot more than i can say for many posts that i see on here! Sit back and watch the heavily over matched Cardinals get curbstomped!! Just like every other mismatch!! I believe this one gets really ugly! That super power Louisville offence gets 2 tds maybe a fg too....
|
Covers | 95 |
|
|
I argree with combato as far as the coaching being in disarray. But that is about it!! You saw in the Cincy game that their short coaching staff could have cost them the game in the first quarter. They were lost! Like that game Texas Tech is a far superior team. They got it together and pulled it out despite the coaching problem and Duke playing their best game of the year. The same thing happens here. Except its not as close as game. RED RAIDERS large! How you came up with TT winning 28-27 i would LOVE to see. Really how is this system suppose to work???
|
Covers | 47 |
|
|
I didn't want to give anyone the wrong numbers. I was right Ohio has covered 4-8 ATS this year. They are 1-5 on the road!! While ULM is 8-4 ATS this year and are 6-1 on the road. Colton Browning is back as well. Taking ULM half and game! The Over on all ULM games is this year is something to look at as well! GLTA |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by the1andonly12: That is @#@#@ Hilarious! After reading the analysis on UCLA i doubled my bet on Baylor. Come on Baylor just girl slapped kstate among others. Im FADING here as well! ULM road record ATS is 6-1. While Ohio can't win a game away from home. and where something like 4-8 if memory serves covering ATS this year. (not sure on that close). ULM by 10+
you suck u like ULCA give me UL Monroe
P.S I'M DRUNK BUT UL Monroe covers gl on the rest of your picks |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
Cyloclones all the way |
Covers | 24 |
|
|
everyone is right temple cant throw. All clemson has to do is bend, not break and they cover. If they dominate, which i think they will it gets ugly. clemson for the large
|
Covers | 33 |
|
|
i agree clemson and over all way
|
Covers | 21 |
|
|
LSU and over. Im new here i like some info that ive gotten on here. Alot of good info that checked out. I hope i can help give some insight. LSU defense contains a-m offense. LSU offense controls tempo.
|
Covers | 55 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.