Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Brian7479: Most books do. I'm using mybookie.ag at the moment Ok thanks. Guess I need a new bookie! |
Brian7479 | 6 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive: Here is NBA.com with video on all these goobers https://www.nba.com/article/2017/05/30/nba-announces-officials-2017-finals And today's refs https://official.nba.com/referee-assignments/ Note as a tribute to LeBroon the head ref Danny Crawford is working his 33rd game. He was also lead on game 7 last year so he is obviously here to remind the teams of their places in this series. He wants to let the Cavs know they win and the Warriors they lose. https://www.sbnation.com/nba/2016/6/19/11972514/danny-crawford-referee-nba-finals-2016-game-7 Home teams are 2-6 SU when Crawford is main ref this postseason https://www.nbastuffer.com/referee_stats Home teams are 32-40 ATS when he refs all year. Home teams are 31-39-2 when Stafford refs. Home teams are 30-40-1 when Zach Zarba refs. Home teams are 29-39-1 when Sean Wright refs. CAVS +7 I see 2 of the 3 refs games also lean over, Any insight on the point total? |
bobmaloogatimesfive | 38 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Brian7479: I'm not going to sit here and guarantee a winning bet like some people because nothing is guaranteed in gambling but one thing that stands out to me is the 3rd quarter line. The over is set at 55. In the conference finals Cleveland and Boston averaged 58.2 points(not to mention that includes a bad 17 point quarter from Boston and a bad 21 point quarter from Cleveland). In the WCF the Warriors and spurs averaged 64.75 points in the 3rd quarters. Obviously there's ways but I just don't see how these 2 teams don't combine for 56 or 66 or 76 in the third quarter. Both teams have come out scoring and getting scored on out of halftime. Clevelands defense can't handle GS offense and GS overrated defense(my opinion) can't handle cleveland offense consistently. Yes I know GS has had "the 2nd best defense" but even without Kawhi and Parker the spurs averaged 30 points in the 3rd quarter against the Warriors. And Boston even with 2 bad showings averaged 27 against cleveland in the 3rd quarters. Now you got 2 of the top 3 offenses playing each other with the numbers that they've been putting up coming out of halftime and the line is only set at 55? For those of us that have the word trap come to our heads I was wondering the same thing early in the conference finals and the numbers kept going over. I haven't made this bet yet and again will never guarantee a win like some guys here but would like your guys thoughts on this. What bookmaker has that line? The 2 I use only have 1st half lines. Thanks. |
Brian7479 | 6 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:
I will eat crow here and lost this future -- Rockets truly sucked -- Cavs will win it all though CLAW -- and neither weak behind team out east can stop them (or the Spurs or Warriors) -- your stats can't account for the real numbers behind the game https://decider.com/2017/03/30/has-kobe-bryant-lost-his-damn-mind-musecage/ Powers so much greater than you Well that Kobe Bryant "musecage" video was quite deep. They obviously made this for the sheeple. It powerful stuff, tho. |
bobmaloogatimesfive | 34 |
|
||||||||
This info helped me to make money. Thanks!
|
RLeith35 | 12 |
|
||||||||
Maybe you should consider his Blazing 5, along with RJ Bell's "Wiseguy" agreement or disagreement.
RJ Bell/Wiseguys pick: Rams +13.5 => agreement. Bellicheck as double-digit favs ATS 11-25-1. Brady not 100%. Fisher 30 games above .500 as a dog. Packers -6 => agreement. Texans 3 out of last 4 games on the road. Packers at home after road win, 14-4-1 ATS. Packers in Dec or later, 30-15-2 ATS. Bills +3 => disagreement. Both teams overrated but Raiders better team. Giants +5.5 => disagreement. Since 2010 Superbowl, Steelers 58% ATS home, 44% road. During Big Ben era, Steelers in Dec 38-19-1 ATS. Steelers need this game bad. Bucs +4 => slight disagreement. Bucs off upset win, then on the road. 340 games, teams off upset win at home to go on road, 40% ATS. |
TheFootball77 | 11 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Woodd2: BOL tonight guys love the insight from everyone , just remember when betting on a team the QB is the player who carries the most weight. I'll take Rodgers all day over wentz at plus points BOL with ur bets. Should be an interesting MNF game.
|
Woodd2 | 39 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by yorosan: I love the packers here, they lost their last 4 games in which all 4 winning team have elite QBs, matty ice, luck, mariotta (future pro bowl), and cousins now they're facing a rookie QB, maybe slightly better than goff, see what happened in NO last nite!!! as long as GB not turning the ball over, I think they will be fine!!!! GB has the weakest strength of schedule in the NFL. https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2016-nfl-strength-of-schedule-49ers-falcons-at-no-1-packers-at-no-32/
|
Woodd2 | 39 |
|
||||||||
GB 1-4 SU & 2-3 ATS on the road. PHI 4-0 SU & 4-0 ATS at home. & the matchup trends from here on covers:
Packers are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games in November. Packers are 0-4 ATS in their last 4 games in Week 12. Packers are 0-3-1 ATS in their last 4 games after allowing more than 250 yards passing in their previous game. Only trend in the packers favor is that head-to-head they're 4-1 ATS. GB doesn't seem like a strong play to me.
|
Woodd2 | 39 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Woodd2: Bj and cub The sheer fact that I'm getting this many points with MF Rodgers over the rook is just amazing .... if these picks lose I'll gladly pay but this is good value, packers should hang 28-35 on these MFs Why should GB "hang 28-35 on those MFs"? GB averages 24.7 PPG & PHI defense allows 18.6. Doesn't sound like a recipe for 28-35 points for GB. What am I missing? I'm looking at GB around 22 points.
|
Woodd2 | 39 |
|
||||||||
U rocked it bro!
|
SWACCTIME | 8 |
|
||||||||
Nice 1!
|
specs21 | 17 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Broncodevil: Breaking the losing streak today on this first prop bet.......... RAMS - SAINTS OVER 4 SACKS + 120 Like the juice. Last 2 games Rams have 4,1 sacks while allowing 1,3 sacks. Last 2 games Saints have 7,6 sacks while allowing 3, 1 sacks Even though Goff was only sacked once in his debut , I think the Saints will get to him in the loud Super Dome. The Rams will get to Brees at least once. Total 4 seems easy to reach and am thinking 5 is the number! Nice 1. Good observation on this prop.
|
Broncodevil | 2 |
|
||||||||
Very nice picks, including your "degenerate" picks. SD was -3 though & still a winner. Betting NBA for the first time this season with some small success, so far. Looking to start on CBB for the first time as well, once the teams have 10 games under their belts. Looking forward to your CBB capping.
|
Madden21 | 34 |
|
||||||||
replied to
GIANTS @ BROWNS: It's back to capping basics with this one. Road chalk can burn in HELL.
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by wmi799: Congrats on the single dumbest post of the day, The Browns and any NFL would kill Alabama. Men versus boys He must have been joking. It should be obvious that a professional team of average-aged 26 year old men vs college boys (some of whom will go to the NFL but are still not professional football players) would get their fools handed to them by the Browns, Jags, Niners or any other currently poor NFL team.
|
scalabrine | 282 |
|
||||||||
Just 1 of the handful of Thanksgiving teasers that cashed. I had Was @ Dal capped at 51 points though, so that's why I do teasers.
|
SuperSlapem | 22 |
|
||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by LetsGoHokies: Just did this 3 team, 10pt Wash Dallas over 42.5 Pit +1 Detroit +9 Looks good. BOL with your bets.
|
Purcell | 27 |
|
||||||||
replied to
wanna know why ratings are down? A poor product along with awful officiating is the recipe
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE: In one day, not ONE, not TWO, but THREE jet liners peentrate two of the most secure airpsaces in the entire globe: 1) NY's Financial District and 2) The Pentagon Not to mention Tower 7, which was not hit by an airplane, "collapsed" in the same fashion as the 2 towers that were directly hit. I was there in the flesh when it all went down. But I digress....back to sports betting. Let's get this Thanksgiving NFL money! (& LSU money haha)
|
Achilles1629 | 36 |
|
||||||||
Thanksgiving 7-pt teaser:
Minnesota Pk => +7 Washington +6.5 => +13.5 WAS@DAL Over 52 => 45 |
Purcell | 27 |
|
||||||||
Thanksgiving 7-pt teaser:
Minnesota Pk => +7 Washington +6.5 => +13.5 WAS@DAL Over 52 => 45 |
LetsGoHokies | 10 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.