Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Whalewatcher:
Exactly we were talking SB wins.........for some reason this bitch keeps chiming in with wrong info!!!!! I tried to tell her,......just dumb I think!!!!!!! Whalewatcher. Thank you for the second voice. Can't believe phillies926 doesn't get it. As I noted, phillies 926 mentioned "playoff wins" even though the original post was clearly referring to SB wins. That being said, even if we give phillies926 the benefit of the doubt, Montana and Brady are tied at 16 playoff wins. Bonus info for any PGA players out there. Watch out for my boy Y.E. Yang this week. Shoulda won two years ago and finished top 8 last year. Worth a look at 50-1. Small play on Kyle Stanley (40-1), who will either bounce back big (I think) or else completely fold after last week's unbelievable meltdown on 18. Highlighted by the 16th hole, this tournament is a fun one to watch as it provides a good distraction to get us to the SB Kickoff. GLTA this week. Still sticking with NYG moneyline, under 55, parlaying NYG and under, and under 27.5 for the first half. |
Covers | 245 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:
That is impossible since he need 2 playoff wins to get to Montana's record you moron. Pretty sure the poster was talking about Super Bowl wins, and Brady has 3 and Montana has 4. You referenced "playoff" wins. The current score on that is Montana 16, Brady 16. If you are going to take shots at people, it might be good to have your facts in order. |
Covers | 245 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by phillies926:
Everyone and their mothers was on the Patriots in that Super Bowl but somehow everyone took the Giants in Super Bowl 42 according to these posts. That makes no sense since the bookies made a killing on that game thanks to the GMen. So I am highly doubting every poster on here took the GMen in that game. Lets be real people. phillies926, Why do you and so many others on this site feel the need to attack people instead of discussing the games logically and trying to help each other out? I did in fact have the Giants ML, the under, and I parlayed them both, making for a quite a good day. Frankly, I don't care whether or not you or anyone else believes me. How about looking at the reasons I'm picking them this year and commenting on that instead of making assumptions and taking personal shots at people. One more thing, did you ever consider that the percentage of people on this site who picked NYG four years ago would be higher than the general population? People who don't bet all year come out of the woodwork for Super Bowl action. There are many sharp cappers who use this site daily, yet you find it impossible that any of the posters here outsmarted the public? Good luck to all non-haters, and take the G-Men and the under, whether or not you believe I called it four years ago. |
Covers | 245 |
|
|
Sorry for the double-post. |
Covers | 245 |
|
|
It's been four years and both teams' rosters have changed significantly, but the fundamental philosophies of each organization remain unchanged. The Giants balanced offense can hang with New England if by chance it becomes a shootout. The more likely scenario is the Giants winning a low-scoring game led by their Defensive Line. The NE passing game is all about protection and timing. The Giants never-ending wave of QB-attacking defensive lineman will rattle Brady the entire game and Eli will do what needs to be done to get the win. For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of either team. Just callin' what I see. Giants ML LARGE! Under 1st half 27.5 LARGE! Under 55 LARGE! Giants ML and Under 55 Parlay. I know it's easy to say four years after the fact, but I was all over the Giants ML and the under then, and I like both plays even better this year! GLTA |
Covers | 245 |
|
|
It's been four years and both teams' rosters have changed significantly, but the fundamental philosophies of each organization remain unchanged. The Giants balanced offense can hang with New England if by chance it becomes a shootout. The more likely scenario is the Giants winning a low-scoring game led by their Defensive Line. The NE passing game is all about protection and timing. The Giants never-ending wave of QB-attacking defensive lineman will rattle Brady the entire game and Eli will do what needs to be done to get the win. For what it's worth, I'm not a fan of either team. Just callin' what I see. Giants ML LARGE! Under 1st half 27.5 LARGE! Under 55 LARGE! Giants ML and Under 55 Parlay. I know it's easy to say four years after the fact, but I was all over the Giants ML and the under then, and I like both plays even better this year! GLTA |
Covers | 245 |
|
|
Toby Gerhart has been really solid, showing improvement every week. He's nowhere near the RB that A.P. is, but he's a grinder who is surpisingly good on the screen passes. It sounds like Ponder is starting, but I like the Vikes better with Joe Webb at QB. One thing to note--Vikings TE/FB Jim Kleinsasser is playing in his last game. Though he's a relative unknown outside of the Midwest, the guy is one of the classiest players to ever play in the NFL. A tough, unselfish, punishing blocker who's been a favorite of all Vikings players and coaches over the last decade. The Vikings players and coaches will be UP for this game as they want to send Kleinsasser off on a good note. Coach Frasier has already said they'll give Jimmy the ball if they get it down to the one yard line. A fired-up Vikes team is going to pound the ball on the ground (especially if Urlacher is out) and get off to an early lead. Jared Allen is 1/2 a sack ahead of Jason Babin for the season and still has an outside shot at the Strahan/Favre record. Look for him to get to Bears QBs early and often. If Ponder struggles, they'll give him the hook and go with Webb. Don't understimate the Kleinsasser factor--the Vikings want this game. Vikes roll and win by 10+ Yes, I live in Minnesota, but I almost always bet Against the Vikes. |
Covers | 4 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.