Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
A friend in need is a friend indeed. I might kick his ass though...
DON"T BET IF YOU DON'T HAVE MONEY!!!
Is it that damn hard??
|
dtv001 | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AlphaDog:
And thats what was said when they played Clemson, Georgia, UT, and LSU.....11-0 in SEC is no way over rated. If they lose the a good UF team , doesn't mean they are over rated. No doubt... I would normally never agree with an Alabama fan this time of year, but undefeated in the SEC is in no way overrated!! ..... Still gotta throw a War Eagle in though!! |
kuddish | 186 |
|
|
yes they can
|
mr_who | 2 |
|
|
My buddy owes the book like $3200. Do you really think he will get his legs broken? I may let him borrow the money, but I don't know if the guy is all talk or what. I bet online so I don't have this problem. He is freaking out big time. Maybe you have dealt with this before. Thanks
|
dtv001 | 9 |
|
|
Ball State for SURE!! They would get DESTROYED!!
|
kuddish | 186 |
|
|
Strongest play on the board??? The biggest game of the week, and the Oklahoma D is going to stop the Texas Tech O to cover the 7?? WOW, what is your reasoning? I wouldn't touch this game with your money. Plus, why the hell would you think that Oklahoma would jump Texas? That would be a good matchup for Florida for sure. The SEC is gonna slam the Big 12 in the BCS championship!!
|
Irish08 | 17 |
|
|
No doubt. What's wrong with the option. Personally, I think more teams should run it. Look at how Nebraska dominated all the way into the 2000's. Georgia Tech is much more successful than they were last year. I think that a team like Auburn would be dangerous in the option offense. Don't see whre you are coming from there. I think it is boring watching a team like Texas Tech just throw the ball 90% of the time. Guess its all about personal preference.
|
dtv001 | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PeterGrifin1Fan:
Personally, I don't want to go into this again because I've done this so many times with so many different people and it makes me look like a Pac-10 homer but until OOC scheduling is more universal, there's going to be too much conference parity going around.
I took a look at the top 5 teams from the SEC, Big 12, and Pac-10 and looked at their OOC scheduling. I think OOC scheduling done by the Big-12 and SEC creates this unfair bias as them being the supreme conference because their top teams have a better chance of getting into conference play with as many undefeated teams as possible. And so it goes...
SEC Top 5 Teams (Florida, Georgia, LSU, South Carolina, Alabama): 20 OOC Games, 7 Big-6 Games, 4 Away Games
Big 12 Top 5 Teams (Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Texas, Oklahoma State, Missouri): 20 OOC Games, 5 Big-6 Games, 4 Away Games
Pac 10 Top 5 Teams (USC, Cal, Arizona, Oregon State, Oregon):
15 OOC Games, 7 Big-6 Games, 6 Away Games
I'm not trying to validate the Pac-10 as a great conference right now because I don't believe they are. But I'm simply showing that the OOC scheduling gives the Big-12 and SEC an unfair advantage by scheduling so many home/inferior games to boost their overall W-L record, that they will more than likely have more ranked teams when their conference play starts, and therefore, have more big time BCS wins when they play their conference foes.
Let the hating begin!
Peter, Peter.. OOC Scheduling proves the Pac 10 is the better conference?? The Pac 10 has a losing record against the Mountain West brother. This could go on for days and neither one of us will be sway. I think one thing that we can both agree on is that it is time for a damn playoff in college football. Then we could put all of this aside and know who TRULY is the best! |
kuddish | 186 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by nyduccie:
Lobos.. dont back down.. The SEC is the most over rated conference.. THIS YEAR.. not every year.. but they are living off past accomplishments at this point.. And the only thing more over rated than their teams are their fans.. There is nothing worse than an SEC fan b/c they root for a conference instead of a team. Its like the yankees losing in the playoffs but then rooting for the Red Sox.. Not real fans at all.. kinda gay.. Not that it has anything to do with capping.. just thought id mention I guess thats why the SEC leads in attendance every year. Because everyone takes a ticket to any game they can get their hands on. What a dumbass comment. I hate Alabama worse than any other team in the nation, but that doesn't make them overrated. The SEC consistently dominates EVERY sport, not just football, so people hate. Past accomplishments?? I guess since there has not been a national championship since the last one, we have to talk about the SEC as defending national champions. Plus, we have 2 teams in the top 5, and 3 in the top 10. How the hell is that overrated? Livetogamble- You have a UCLA avitar and you are calling the SEC overrated? The Pac 10 is worse than the Mountain West, look at your W-L record against them. USC would never win 6 straight SEC championships, PERIOD!! Then to say that "everyone" said that Ohio St should not have been in both national championship games is crazy. If you remember correctly, the media said that Florida shouldn't be there and Ohio State was favored. Come on guys, I know it sucks to lose to the SEC every year, but you gotta do better than that! |
kuddish | 186 |
|
|
Good stuff everyone.
Kragthorpe should get definite consideration
Bill Stewart will be gone soon
Phil Fulmer and Tommy Bowden are already gone
Tommy Tubberville would be on the list if not for past success. He needs to let an offensive guy come in and bring his own damn people.
Also, Westcoast, I don't see how leaving a school with an almost guaranteed BCS bid every year to go to a school with overhyped expectations could be a smart move. I know that Michigan is the better known program, and rightfully so with their tradition, but look at how long it has taken Alabama to get the right guy. Michigan is going to have similar type patience and he is completly reinventing the wheel there. I agree with GAM that it is a 4-5 yr process at minimum and with the season he had this year I don't see him having that long. Maybe I am wrong
Thanks for the feedback!!
|
dtv001 | 30 |
|
|
There goes lobos (the expert again). I guess 2 straight national championships don't account for anything? USC was also ranked number 1 and lost, Clemson was a top 10 team and they suck, West Virginia was a top 10 team, how about Kansas, and Missouri. Hell Oklahoma will go to a BCS game and get blown out again. SEC wins when it counts bro, check your shit. Tennessee, LSU (2), and Florida have all won BCS championship games. No other conference can tout that. I have proof, where is yours? Don't get mad because we beat that ass baby!!
|
kuddish | 186 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lobosrule:
yo DT... better remember you said that... besides, not one thing you said makes any difference in this argument...
Harbaugh has been a coach for less than 2 years... he took over probably the worst program of any of the BCS conference schools, and already has them battling for a bowl game... Carroll took over USC, arguably the most successful program in the history of college football...
in other words, your ENTIRE ARGUMENT was retarded!
once again... one year from now every one of you haters better be ready to eat your words... because since most of you only know what an ESPN analyst tells you (whereas i know what my eyes and exptertise tell me), you are going to "learn" what i already know by then...
put Harbaugh on USC, and they aren't just in the picture this year, they are the front-runner... and even you could coach USC to a PAC-10 title this year...
God people are retards!
Ok dumbass. Numbers speak for themselves. The last coach at Stanford that had any success (Tyrone Willingham) went on to have a lot of success when he left. Not to mention, if we are going to talk to coaches overachieving at a school with high academic standards, Bobby Johnson is having a much more impressive year in a much better conference. And since you are such an expert, and you see with your expertise, where is your resume. Do you get paid as a football analyst, or do you just post enough threads that you feel you are an expert now? I would not have said anything if I would have known I was talking to an expert. My bad asshole!! |
lobosrule | 110 |
|
|
All you SEC haters are idiots. Face it, the SEC is the best conference in the nation and they will prove it again when Florida wins its second national championship in 2 years, and the 3rd straight for the SEC. The Big 12 has blown up offensive numbers because the defenses suck. The SEC will dominate yet another national championship game.
As for the question- I am hard pressed to find a reason other than the Nick Saban factor. He has a knack for getting his teams ready to play big games and he has won 2 SEC championships in the past. I think Bama will come out strong and fade out toward the end. 31-27
Florida-Texas is the championship game!!
|
Irish08 | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BillyBuck:
Rich Rod? No way....have you seen his QB'sthis year? He is going to be a great coach... Like I said, he may be the biggest dumbass. I think Michigan will run him off before he will become great. He almost went to Alabama. Do you think he would be having the kind of success that Nick Saban is having right now?? I think he would have become like a Frank Beamer, or a Tommy Tubberville type coach at West Virginia by keeping a mid pack team overachieving year after year. He probably would have had more success being in the Big East. Not made for big time football though, in my opinion. Thanks for the feedback |
dtv001 | 30 |
|
|
LOL!!!!!! Harbaugh a better coach than Pete Carroll?? That is the single dumbest comment I think that I have read on this site. You are an absolute idiot. 6 straight Pac 10 titles, and a 7th on the way. 2 straight national titles, and in the 3rd with a great chance to win. USC is in the national title picture every year. Stanford will never be in the national title picture. Part of being a great college coach is being a great recruiter, so that point is null. That is so stupid to say that. CRAZY!! |
lobosrule | 110 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by MaineRoad]
He always seemed like a decent guy. Of course, this had to happen, but I assume he's got a family and we're heading into the holidays. You'll have to excuse me from the "celebration." [/Quote
Let me get my tissues out a cry for a man that has been making over 1 million dollars a year and way under performing. Shouldn't we all be so lucky. There are people out there making $8 hr that under perform and get fired around the holidays. I feel a little more sorry for them. I am in sales, if I don't perform, I don't get paid!! That's life buddy. This is a performance, "what have you done for me lately" kind of job and these people know it before they sign the contract. Save the sadness for a Hallmark card. |
nuggetsfan | 13 |
|
|
I have been thinking about this for a little while and come up with this top 5 list:
Charlie Weis is the worst coach in college football. He makes in the top 5 of college football salaries. He is at a university that still thinks they are in the top of the football elite. They have not beat anybody ranked since he has been there, he also has barely beat anybody that has a winning record.
Greg Robinson, just look at his record. Don't really have to say much more.
Tyrone Willingham is probably the second worst coach in college football. He has now made another program a bottom scraper. Everyone was griping because Notre Dame let him go, and look at him now. I do think that Charlie Weis should get the boot too.
.Rich Rodriguez. He may just be the biggest dumbass in college football, but I think he will not make it past next year at Michigan. The spread offense works a lot better in the Big East against Big East talent. He cannot get this turned around in a year and I don't think the Michigan faithful will put up with it much longer.
Les Miles. I know that people are going to argue that he won a national championship, but he did that with a majority of Nick Saban recruits. He is a horrible play caller, and is one of the most cocky people around. I do respect the way that he handled the Michigan situation last year, but that is the best thing that the mad hatter has done.
Who did I miss?
|
dtv001 | 30 |
|
|
All of you people bashing the SEC are just jealous that your team is not worthy to play in the SEC. Any of the top tier teams (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, even LSU) would be in the top 2 or 3 of any conference in the nation. The Big 12 has overrated offense because they are playing weak defenses every week. The Pac10 is a JOKE. The Mountain West is a tougher conference than the Pac 10. The Big 10 cannot compete with the SEC, that has already been proven. Hell, the SEC won the national championship last year with 2 losses. I would like to see another conference do that, The SEC has beaten the ACC, the Big 12, and the Big 10 in national championship games and the trend will continue this year. I cannot wait to see all of the Big 12 homers after Florida OR Alabama dominates in another SEC rout in the national championship game.
As for the most overrated team; Ball State without a doubt. Have they even played anyone in the top 50? That would be just as big of an embarrasment as Hawaii was last year. These weak teams should not even be considered, I don't care if they won 100 games in a row. Boise State and Utah could both hold their own in the Pac 10, ACC, Big East, or Big 10. They would get destroyed in the SEC, or the BIg 12.
|
kuddish | 186 |
|
|
1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. Texas Tech
4. Texas
5. Oklahoma
6. USC
7. Penn State
8. Oklahoma State
9. Utah
10. Georgia
1. Crabtree
2. Tebow
3. Harrell
|
Dickson Cider | 21 |
|
|
1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. Texas Tech
4. Texas
5. Oklahoma
6. USC
7. Penn State
8. Oklahoma State
9. Utah
10. Georgia
1. Crabtree
2. Tebow
3. Harrell
|
Dickson Cider | 21 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.