Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I meant 14 was the highest LATELY. I know there's been streaks longer than that, but my thought is that it doesn't happen often
|
seafood_pasta | 12 |
|
|
Here's another thought... I know someone has done this before so I will not take the credit, but it works. The concept was to find streak survivors that have 10+ streaks and start to fade them in a chase. You can implement the star rating by fading those with low RSI star ratings (not sure what parameters you would want to set, or just play them all). Plus, its VERY rare to see someone get a long streak (I think 14 is the highest??) which would mean you would have only seen Game 4 in the chase ONE time |
seafood_pasta | 12 |
|
|
Kansas City should be filtered out - SLUMP
|
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
Hey Chaser, I'm loving this system! I'm having a hard time following with consistency though... wasn't Houston a "no play" yesterday due to SLUMP? I saw they entered that game on a 3 game skid. Just wondering if we're abandoning that filter or if it was just missed? Either way - great system! |
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
Hey Chaser, aren't the Rangers a 'no play' due to SLUMP? Just double checking, making sure I'm following correctly. Thanks!
|
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
So because Twins and Padres have both lost 3 straight, we avoid them until they win a game, and then resume the chase as Game4 when they fit the EVEN to +150 criteria... correct??
|
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
Hi again Chaser, One more question just to clarify... So if you're currently playing on a team and they lose their 3rd straight as a dog of EVEN to +150, you avoid them their next game because of the filter of 3+ game skid then, right?? |
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
Hey chaser, Is this system backtested with proven results from previous years? |
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
chaser16, quick question... So for example, if you're chasing the Angles and Game1 they are +130 and they lose, then the next day the Angles are -130, you DO NOT play on that as Game2, right?? You would wait till they are dogs of up to +150 again, right?? Just want to make sure I'm following this system correctly |
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
Am I seeing it right for today... would every game qualify as playing on the underdog today????
|
chaser15 | 143 |
|
|
I think I see two more plays...
Washington -7.5 San Antonio Under 192.5 |
SUPEREAGLE43 | 137 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SUPEREAGLE43:
I think we have an awesome opportunity in ncaa hoops tonight. I will do a 2 game chase with Iowa St. and Indiana plus the points. This has nothing to do with this thread, just thought I would share what I feel like is an excellent opportunity. If Iowa St covers then the chase is complete. Any method or reasoning to this opportunity? |
SUPEREAGLE43 | 137 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SUPEREAGLE43:
You almost have it right. Combine 11 and 11 for $22. That will be the wager for EVERY game that comes up. For however many games you go below .500 you add another number. For however many games you go above .500 you remove 2 numbers. If you happen to go 4-0 then 2 of the wins are just bonus, so to speak. These extra wins are where you really make up your losses. I hope that all makes since. Ahhh okay I got, makes sense. Thanks for explaining! I've never played the Labby but I think I like that MM strategy a lot more than martingale when it comes to chasing. Thanks! |
SUPEREAGLE43 | 137 |
|
|
So do you just increase your labby line? originally it was just 11-11-11-11 which would only be 2 bets, right? 11+11 = 22 and 11+11 = 22
Am I missing something? |
SUPEREAGLE43 | 137 |
|
|
I see San Diego Padres, LA vs WINN Under, and Indiana -13 as plays for today..... but how do you decipher which to play for your labby line??? This is a very intriguing concept! I like this! |
SUPEREAGLE43 | 137 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SUPEREAGLE43:
Today Wednesday: Orioles -105 to win $14 Where did you see this being a play? I'm not seeing any of the Streaks of 10+ having this game as a play for today.... |
SUPEREAGLE43 | 137 |
|
|
Hey not sure if anyone has still been following the Holy Grail Sytem, but I believe Milwaukee is a Game5 of a 5 game chase tonight. Can anyone who's been following confirm this??
Thanks guys!
|
JEFFTHEHAT | 353 |
|
|
irage,
I think there's something there in a system when a team scores equal to or over the posted total BY THEMSELVES, then chase that winning team to win a game over the next 5 games or so. I think the criteria needs to be tightened up to playing on home teams in this scenario or something. Any chance you can play with this scenario and come up with some numbers? Thanks!
|
irage | 83 |
|
|
Post #199 has CWS as a G3 and they lost that night. Wouldn't tonight be G4 for CWS? Just want to make sure I'm on the correct game for wager purposes.
|
bDnews | 287 |
|
|
Hey pockets. I understand the way this system works, taking the first rotation game on the board and taking the dog with the points in a 6 game chase. My question is:
Can you share the results and breakdown of previous years with this system for the WNBA? Thanks!
|
inyourpockets | 16 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.