Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hahaha. Good one, Skins!
||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>
P.S. I wonder how many people will catch this...
* CalvinTy
|
SkinsRaj | 13 |
|
|
Thanks, Rizzo. Found it. (after I disabled Ad-Block Plus plugin in my Firefox browser for Wagerline, too)
* CalvinTy
|
cbsscott | 31 |
|
|
I went to the link Mister Lock posted. I noticed Wagerline made a mistake on freightdog's profile, ha.
Username: freightdog
Real Name: Jared Romanowicz
Location: Euless, TX
Age: 28
Occupation: Pilot
Contest: Survivor Contest
Prize: $1,000 cash
Record: 20 Straight Wins
Player Since: 12/7/2007 ||surprised.gif' border=0>
Favorite Sport: College Basketball
Wow, freightdog hasn't joined Wagerline yet!? ||an_wink.gif' border=0>
Grins.
* CalvinTy
|
Mister Lock | 18 |
|
|
@fartnsniff,
Where on the home page (www.wagerline.com???) can I find the infamous pix of Tuppy, eh?
||paint_help.gif' border=0>
* CalvinTy
|
cbsscott | 31 |
|
|
Congrats, Tuppy! Let's hope you hit through the "20" barrier!
Cheers,
* CalvinTy
|
Rizzo | 14 |
|
|
@dwest718,
I believe that. It's before too many of a majority form an opinion of a game based on early consensus so naturally, there are many games available when only 100 people have chosen the picks with only 58 for one team, 42 for the other team. You would be able to pick either team at that time, before it gets worse into a landslide of 150-400 or something like that.
@wizardofroz,
I honestly don't think Wagerline cares what games a player gets to pick overnight. They know that any heavy consensus would reduce most "followers" choices in picking a game so they don't have to actually limit games to anyone, including anybody at 20 wins. Their computers simply follow OUR consensus leans & eliminate games based on what we DO.
In fact, I'm glad they have overnights because we might already know what we want for tomorrow & we can grab the pick before it's followed by tooooooo many others ("copycats"). Wagerline will naturally let us keep a pick that ends up at 70% just because we were the early birds; they just don't want the copycats to pick all 70% leans to pad their potential winning streaks with no true capping attempt.
* CalvinTy
|
sooner59 | 38 |
|
|
Yeah, TexanGambler1, Hou 54% vs Pitt 46% for the side, you are right.
However, the total is heavily on Under at 66.5% so this game isn't available. Guess that's part of the criteria...
* CalvinTy
|
sooner59 | 38 |
|
|
GL, Tuppy, on the +12 Wiz pick. I would have made the same pick since I follow Wiz somewhat... I know the Cavs can win this game by DD, but there's value in +12 on Wiz, I believe...
* CalvinTy
|
FoShizzle | 18 |
|
|
Thanks for your reply, W-T.
* CalvinTy
|
sooner59 | 38 |
|
|
In fact, if everyone would look at this link now:
https://www.wagerline.com/Handicapping/consensusPick/daily-consensus-picks.aspx?sport=5
Only 2 MLB games currently qualifies with less than 59% on BOTH side/totals of each game.
Det +122/CWS -130
Side: 48.74/51.26%
Total (O/U 11): 51.38/48.62%
SD -110/Ari +102
Side: 53.64/46.36%
Total (O/U 7.5): 53.70/46.30%
I guess the Det/CWS game is off the board because CWS is at -130. Not sure, but if enough Survivor contestants pick CWS at -130, I can understand why it's now OTB.
* CalvinTy
|
sooner59 | 38 |
|
|
W-T,
What do you mean by "heavily played"? Number of Survivor contestants playing those games? (or the number of general MLB Consensus picks as shown here: https://www.wagerline.com/Handicapping/consensusPick/daily-consensus-picks.aspx?sport=5)
Others,
From what I understand during my short time observing on/off... if EITHER the side OR total reaches 59/60% consensus at that point of the day, then it's off the board until it goes back under 59/60% before it reappears again.
So, TexanGambler1, Hou +109/Pitt -117 probably is off the board due to 66.42% on the Under as of right now. Both the side and total must appear in the list of available games, but if the total is heavily played (assuming my interpretation is somewhat right), then that game as a whole won't show up.
* CalvinTy
|
sooner59 | 38 |
|
|
I just checked here to see what happened to Tor -5.5 (as I remember that's what Tuppy quickly chose last night) and saw the final score as 83-89. Wow, a nice 0.5 point win! We all get that from time to time, but not as dramatic as this! GL!
* CalvinTy
|
ericfox3 | 5 |
|
|
Good luck, Tuppy, on reaching your 18th win. Now that freightdog's amazing run at 20 straight won has come to an end tonight, I'm sure all eyes are on you now. Keep composed & good luck on the next few days especially if Vancouver does win for you tonight!
* CalvinTy
|
TheInstigator | 17 |
|
|
Sorry for the incorrect pick, freightdog. What a great run going 20-0-2 in the last 2 months!
* CalvinTy
|
freightdog | 75 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.