Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
UGENE - University of Oregon senior offensive lineman Nick Cody and junior defensive lineman Axel McQuaw will not accompany the Ducks to the Fiesta Bowl after failing to meet the minimum NCAA academic requirements necessary to participate in the post season, according to head coach Chip Kelly.
Cody, a fourth-year letterman from Brush Prairie, Wash., accumulated 18 starting assignments at right guard and tackle over the past four years, including the first six games of the 2012 season. McQuaw, a non-scholarship player from Waldport, had been with the Ducks the last three seasons. He did not play in any games this year after making three appearances in a reserve role in 2011. Oregon reconvenes in Scottsdale, Ariz., on Wednesday, Dec. 26, to resume preparations for the 42nd annual Tostitos Fiesta Bowl on Thursday, Jan. 3. |
Covers | 103 |
|
|
replied to
The same fools that said the Vikings had no chance are the same fools saying JAGS have no chance!
in NFL Betting
LMFAO!!!! wow you guys are sooooo good at this!! I knew better than to post in a tread with soo many geniuses... and you guys claiming indy game thats completly diff it was posted at 14 which was begging you to take Indy... lEARN KEY NUMBERS AND LINE MOVE AND QUIT BETTING TEAMS!! CONGRATS BIG JOHNSON!!
|
onebigjohnson11 | 36 |
|
|
replied to
The same fools that said the Vikings had no chance are the same fools saying JAGS have no chance!
in NFL Betting
bottom line Books want balt action if not it opens at DD
|
onebigjohnson11 | 36 |
|
|
replied to
The same fools that said the Vikings had no chance are the same fools saying JAGS have no chance!
in NFL Betting
You dont compare games a you cap the game after the line.. jags only allowed breeze to put up 26 pts you think flacco will do better LOL
|
onebigjohnson11 | 36 |
|
|
replied to
The same fools that said the Vikings had no chance are the same fools saying JAGS have no chance!
in NFL Betting
I pointed this out yesterday and will again tonight.. vegas dsnt miss lines by 2-3 pts especialy on a monday night.. the line opened at 7.5-8 just like green bay and ran to 10 just like greenbay and Balt will NOT cover just like greenbay.. you think they put this line out at less than DD cause they wanted jags money.. stop they but the bait out and made the public chase it all the way to the key # of 10 then stoped.. ask yourself why did they stop If they wanted the sharps to even out the money at 10.5 they would statrt to take action but they all stooed at 10 just like GB game... take JAX and the UNDER and enjoy... why under this is the highest posted total for these 2 teams EVER since 01 it has gone over 36 2 times and none of them were with a rookie QB... In the word of poo dont be a shnoook
|
onebigjohnson11 | 36 |
|
|
here we go told you that shit was shady!!
|
BIGfnPOO | 7 |
|
|
the back up Web..
|
BIGfnPOO | 7 |
|
|
Big Poo love the videos my guy!! but This game seems a lil fishy to me my guy... reminds me of the philly vs miiny game last yr when they start the back up When against Vic and the eagles and won outrite.. why is this not 12-15 came out at 8 they new the world would be all over GB and chase it all the way to -10 seems like they want the GB action just my opinion will probably lay off till halftime.. riding Miami, SD, and Da bears right now..GL
|
BIGfnPOO | 7 |
|
|
WHAT IS THAT U POSTED POO I SEE 58% ON OK
|
BIGfnPOO | 26 |
|
|
whats up poo we getting a video before the late games??
|
BIGfnPOO | 26 |
|
|
Looks like a lot of confusion on this line and line move.. It is pretty simple Rut. comes out at a -1 fav on the road and the sharps pound Louisville all the way to -2, then the public money rolls in on Rut and has driven it right back and even to -2 on the other side. So the real question is why are the sharps pounding Louisville?? Ans Turnover Margin.. Why has Rutgers been covering and wining Turnovers they are +13 on the season!! louisville is -1... Sharps are playing the law of averages and the fact the Louisville does not put the ball on the carpet!! they have only fumbled 3 times all yr and lost only 1 of them after the debacle in there home opener.. Rutgers has been getting all the bounces and that luck will run out .. why did they struggle last week and not cover... they didn't get the +2-3 turnovers they have been getting in prior games.. I see a lot of people comparing the 2 NC games well Rutgurs played them close right... not really NC turned the ball over 5 TIMES and still won by 2!!! that could easily have been 14-24 pt victory by NC.. against Louisville they only turned it over once and and only won by a TD.. Bottom line Louisville takes care of the ball is fired up in front of the home crowed and Rut. struggles again this week. Louisville has the superior D and just enough offense to pull out a victory!!
|
Covers | 81 |
|
|
every game that opend PK and stayed pick today the dog won 2nd half based on that is it stays pk JETS!! and i need em lol
|
Covers | 43 |
|
|
UNDER!!!
|
Covers | 43 |
|
|
As usual this total came out inflated at 40 then was bet up a full 3 pts.. BUT these are not your mom-mas jets and ravems,, yes ravens like to run the and yes the jets can be vulnerable against the run but its against Big backs like last week with raiders.. ray rice is more of the MJD back who they held to 88 yards... means at some pt the ravens will spread it out abandon the run and go up tempo.. and will have some sucess but IMO not enough to get it done... jets better corners against weaker reviving core and Flacco def misses Heaps... jets skilled recivers and tight end vs ravens secondary that was torched by Hasselback and Tenn. for 358but only rushed for 74 showed the blue print to beat this ravens team.. so the lack of running game by jets does not scare me.. final play Jets and the over parlay and teaser!! GLTA
|
Covers | 43 |
|
|
BANK IT!!
|
Covers | 33 |
|
|
Just trying to figure out how yall cap that these teams have played no defenses and have settled for field goals against garbage teams but still bet the over as your top pla or any play!! WTF are you guy smoking!! I got the under 66 fl +14 and texas +1 3 team tease and under 56.5... GLTA
|
Covers | 97 |
|
|
Letting the house ride second half clemson!! and action rev clemson and under!!
|
Covers | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bkg1010: If this comes true, I'll be on your skirt tail rest of the season! Bears -3.5 I wouldnt do that hes officailly hitting 25% again this yr after Ill won by 3 he said would win by 24 and mich won 58- 0 he CAPPED it as Mich winning by no more than 11.. along with the under last night only game he has hit is pitt... I cant follow anyone that not only looses 75% but has a 1 sentence ans after capping a game no info just I capped this.. I hope he continues to post I will continue to fade!! |
Covers | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JLourenco: guilty .. i buy the hook on 70% of my games and i left it at 51 tonight was not directed at you my guy but that is a shitty way to push.. I liked the under but just knew it was going to be close so the extra 6 pts teasing across 4 key numbers made all the sense in the world to me.. I thought I had the game capped then 2 late articles on USU planning on throwing the ball more tonight which made me throw out all my info and rely on the teaser.. otherwise i would have gone down like so many others.. morning play i fired on was a 10pt tease following steam it has a 75% rate right now its illinois pk, over 44 in tennesse game and under 63 in airforce game.. hopefully the streak continues!!
|
Covers | 90 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raines: JANGO. I guess tonight a teaser neted me a dime. Is that still a fool's play UTAH ST. +16.0 and UNDER 61.5? I think you had CAPPED the UNDER at no more than 41.0. Just missed that by 10 my friend. Nice capping. Raines something tells me Jango and his entourage of 1 will not be posting on this or any other game anytime soon... the real rookie was the guy that left a game on a half and did not buy the hook for the push or win... oops
|
Covers | 90 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.