Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Timmyc: "The whole spygate thing is really old." The whole spygate thing EXISTS!!! And will never go away!!! THEY CHEATED!!! That will never change. They play in the weakest Division in the NFL!!! They lost to the Raiders. He runs up the score against his weak behind opponents on his weak behind schedule every year. And thankfully the league won't let him win it all anymore. that would be his weak a$$ opponents on his weak a$$ schedule.
|
DoubleUp4Life | 47 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by patsrus: totally agree. some people here are just stupid. look, i could care less if some hate the patriots but stop talking out your fools guys. the whole spygate is really old. but like jamound said they still have all winning records after the incident. still made it to the playoffs and superbowl. and brady has been breaking a bunch of records along the way. if you're going to hate the team at least use a reason i can agree with. it's true they havent won a superbowl after spygate but hell they come knocking at the door every season. if the pats went to a shitty record after spygate then you can make your claim that spygate was the reason why they were good but its not true. "The whole spygate thing is really old." The whole spygate thing EXISTS!!! And will never go away!!! THEY CHEATED!!! That will never change. They play in the weakest Division in the NFL!!! They lost to the Raiders. He runs up the score against his weak behind opponents on his weak behind schedule every year. And thankfully the league won't let him win it all anymore.
|
DoubleUp4Life | 47 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13: brady would have 3 rings regardless. Babe ruth could have been on roids who knows 3 Rings... Complete Bullshit!!!! Cheater! His legacy is FOREVER TARNISHED!! No matter what you morons say...
|
DoubleUp4Life | 47 |
|
|
One of his Super Bowls does NOT COUNT!!! The Raiders beat them. I'l credit them for 2. The league wanted New England to advance that year.
I'll debate fact this with anyone!!!! The National Fixed League Strikes Again!!!!
|
DoubleUp4Life | 47 |
|
|
Hopefully a bunch of you didn't slam Florida again.
|
Timmyc | 14 |
|
|
-8 is the halftime line; very similar to last night. Interesting to see if everyone jumps on Florida again.
|
Timmyc | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NNYHILLBILLY: Yea, right, everyone on this site is on Louisville? Everyone from CHARLOTTE on down.... At the time of my post I thought I was the only one. It's great to hear that such great cappers on this site agree. GL...
|
Timmyc | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by timdogs17: Louisville ML?? Insane, Fla can easily win by 20+ I know. That's why I like it. The whole world won yesterday. Not tonight.
|
Timmyc | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dgnowsf: Stanford / Wisky was pretty even. You have to take account the people who took Wisky ML at plus money. Florida St was 50/50 actually. Others were clear public bets though. Really? I saw overwhelming action on all of these teams. Oh well... no biggie. Loving Louisville on Spread and ML. Good Luck!
|
Timmyc | 14 |
|
|
Northwestern, Oklahoma St., Georgia, Stanford, Florida St. ----all high public bet, AND all won and covered.
This trend will not happen again tonight. Louisville is the play.
|
Timmyc | 14 |
|
|
This one's over. NFL(pro sports) is in the bag.
|
ANT_THEROCK | 2 |
|
|
These teams suck and the outcome is unpredictable.
2nd half?
|
Timmyc | 6 |
|
|
for not playing this game.
|
Timmyc | 6 |
|
|
Yes,
My friend is a bookie. The public is all over NO, he says take Minn. Minnesota HUGE,
|
bruinboi | 25 |
|
|
How about Detroit +3 vs. Chicago coming off big win over Philly. Chicago is a huge sucker bet vs. AWFUL Detroit Detroit +3
|
demapples | 82 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.