Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hot Moneyline, Washington is prime to to hand The Panthers their first lost. I love Cousins at QB, the Skins are a physical team built to stop the run and they stick to the run game offensively.
Denver has the #1 Defense in the Galaxy. Chi run has been nice, I do not trust Cutler to play mistake free football. Elway has not missed often in player personal decisions. Brock Osweiler is the prototype for Gary Kubiaks play calling. Brock can roll out and move the pocket. Manning could not. Cincy Moneyline +180 -Who does not like +Plus Money- Risk Vs Reward! I will Take the Bengals as Dog. Arizona has played well, however they due for a loss, and I won't lay the juice to take Arizona as a "safe win" |
Thagrant1 | 1 |
|
|
Those are my top two each single bet GL
|
Thagrant1 | 6 |
|
|
CU @ Ore Cu is so unpredictable, however there A game can beat anyone on the road in the Pac-12(ask Arizona) Oregon has been rather predictable since losing its starting PG (0-3ATS)
lean CU especially if I the line goes up
|
Thagrant1 | 6 |
|
|
Washington+7.5. take it now or the UCLA faithfull push the line up. The huskies are athletic on the wing. Gabby,Suggs, Andrews can play uptempo. Simmons can shoot with space. Wilcox leads the confrence in scoring. If Kemp Jr. plays half the game he played vs Arz. St to support N'Diaye in the Middle Washington covers and may win
|
Thagrant1 | 6 |
|
|
Indiana -6.5
I told myself before the line opened up that I would take Indiana as high as -8 tonight. Illinois lost to Wis from start to finish. They have no inside scoring, or presence. This why they struggle in big ten play. You saw Iowa cover vs Wis last night because they can compete on the glass. Illinois has no Big Ten identity to cover. They cant beat anyone in a half court game, and they cannot hang with Indiana playing an uptempo style. Who can they count on to score after Paul. And we cannot count on Paul for his 17ppg tonight
|
Thagrant1 | 6 |
|
|
Arizona State First Half-2 Game -4.5
Cal cannot stop anything going to the rim, Carson will shred Cal's weak D with pick and roll. Cal has no answer for the 7'2 scoring,rebounding and shot blocking giant. Felix will outplay Crab or negate Crabs scoring, with scoring of his own. Gilling hit 6-8 3Fg last game on the road. Cal not phyiscal enough to cover. I take Carson over any other PG including Burke at Mich. Arz St rolls at home. |
Thagrant1 | 6 |
|
|
Good News for all of Us who already took the Cavs, Kyrie is playing. Add Barnes to the no go list for GS. Lets go Cavs
I am also taking the Hornets BTW
|
Mienballer03 | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Enjoi: kyrie irving - yousickbastard lol. darn it i'll let my bet ride, maybe the star player out system kicks in tonight for cavs I Have rode the cavs since boston. My bet is in. Lets hope he plays. GS had to play all 4 quarters last in Toronto
|
Mienballer03 | 35 |
|
|
I am in with NO pgs give the lakers problems. Davis and Gordon didn't play in the last meeting in which LA hit 13 3fg. Can't trust the Lakers tonight. Also NO has played well recently
|
CAPTAINPAP | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jabber: games was ovet from the tip. Usc struggles to score. Crabb and Cobbs don't.
You say this when the game is almost over...nice call! |
Thagrant1 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Htown1: the points was the easy play. And yes you them as insurance for the ML. I guess the line did not change becouse to many bettors did not want to see the light. Instead of crediting Portland with the win in NY. They say they can't win two straight. The points were golden the ML was the whop. Good play
i took the Blazers and points, just to be safe. it seemed like the obvious play, though a little odd when the line didn't shift to account for the absence of Love and Rubio. Nice call! |
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stevenp: you're whole logic was silly unfortunately.
TEMPTING. but the wolves are full of russians that play in harmony when kevin love is off the floor. EUROS PASS! |
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NBA2H: you took the wolves you had a loser.
I'd go with the Wolves. This is the 4th game in 5 nights for Portland, all traveling. After beating the Knicks, they got trashed by Toronto the night after. Could see a repeat of that. |
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07: I have seen at least 15 timberwolves games. Without Love they are a whole lot easier to defend. Even on his bad nights he is still ccapable of 15 and 12. You should have got win with the spread and the ML
Have you seen Love performances this season? And JJ Barea has been huge in Rubio absence. |
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07: Have you seen Love performances this season? And JJ Barea has been huge in Rubio absence. Love is an inside/outside presence. Team USA member. Every coach must gameplan for him. Barea is a shoot first pg not a playmaker like rubio. Who replaced loves production tonight?
|
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
Pat on the back
|
Thagrant1 | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stevenp: TEMPTING. but the wolves are full of russians that play in harmony when kevin love is off the floor. EUROS PASS! They have two sheavd and AK. Its hard to replace loves production and Rubios natural ability to break down a defense
|
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by NBA2H] I'd go with the Wolves. This is the 4th game in 5 nights for Portland, all traveling. After beating the Knicks, they got trashed by Toronto the night after. Could see a repeat of that.
[/Quote Or the absence of loves presence makes Minnesota an easier team to defend. Add to that the loss of Rubios playmaking. Who makes up for Loves rebounding? |
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
|
Usc struggles to score. Thats not a problem that the Bears have.
|
Thagrant1 | 4 |
|
|
Spread is a great bet. The moneyline may be hot. Wolves playing with no Love or Rubio
|
Thagrant1 | 13 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.