Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
11/18/18
New York Islanders ML -115
BOL |
SuperSic58 | 1 |
|
|
After Opponent Scoring 5 or more goals Top 5 Bottom 5 Flames 4-1 Red Wings 0-3 Senators 4-3 Islanders 0-1 Maple Leafs 3-0 Devils 1-5 Blue Jackets 3-0 Kings1-3 Sabres 3-1 Oilers 1-2 |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SuperSic58:
After Opponent Scoring 5 or more goals Top 5 Bottom 5 Maple Leafs 5-1 Stars 0-3 Bruins 3-1 Blackhawks 0-2 Oilers 3-0 Knights 0-1 Lightning 3-1 Senators 1-3 Islanders 3-1 Avalanche 1-5
Should be "After scoring 5 or more goals" |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
After Opponent Scoring 5 or more goals Top 5 Bottom 5 Maple Leafs 5-1 Stars 0-3 Bruins 3-1 Blackhawks 0-2 Oilers 3-0 Knights 0-1 Lightning 3-1 Senators 1-3 Islanders 3-1 Avalanche 1-5 |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
After opponent shut out Top 5 Bottom 5 Predators 2-1 Islanders 0-2 Stars 1-0 Flames 0-2 Ducks 1-0 Kings 0-1 Lightning 1-0 Flyers 0-1 Oilers 1-0 Blues 0-1 |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
cont. Stars 0-1 Canes 0-1 |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
After being shut out Top 5 Bottom 5 Bruins 3-0 Blackhawks 0-2 Sharks 2-0 Maple Leafs 0-1 Devils 1-0 Penguins 0-1 Canucks 1-0 Canadiens 1-0 |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
B2B Top 5 Bottom 5 Wild 4-0 Blue Jackets 0-3 Islanders 2-0 Blackhawks 0-4 Coyotes 1-0 Capitals 0-3 Panthers 3-1 Jets 0-2 Red Wings 1-1 Avalanche 0-2 |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
Going to dump some stats same as the thread I did late last season and will likely update monthly for those interested. |
SuperSic58 | 8 |
|
|
The narrative play is Pens +800 EC Vs. Vegas +340 WC.
|
piroozi | 14 |
|
|
Royals (J. Hammel) ML +104 Brewers (Z. Davies) ML -113 Indians (M. Clevinger) ML -114
Record: 1-3 Units: -2.02
BOL
|
SuperSic58 | 3 |
|
|
Twins ML -102 Twins @ O's O9 +103 Yankees @ Blue Jays U8.5 -115 Indians @ Mariners U8 -108
BOL |
SuperSic58 | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SuperSic58:
QUOTE Originally Posted by NYBartender: WASH/CIN U4 1 5 -125 BOS -131 PHL -102 I hype up two pitchers and 13+ are scored in each of those games. Today: 1-2 -$127.00 They are 2 pitchers that pitch more unders than overs but Castillo was O/U 2-0-0 against the Nats last season and *Strasburg was 6-0 O/U coming into this facing the Reds. The Great American Ballpark ballpark has been a hitters park 3 out of the past 5 seasons, April and May have been the best for Overs there as well tapering off in June despite the heat picking up. BOL always enjoy reading your NHL threads.
*Strasburg was 6-2-0 O/U |
NYBartender | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NYBartender:
WASH/CIN U4 1 5 -125 BOS -131 PHL -102 I hype up two pitchers and 13+ are scored in each of those games. Today: 1-2 -$127.00 They are 2 pitchers that pitch more unders than overs but Castillo was O/U 2-0-0 against the Nats last season and Strasburg was 6-0 O/U coming into this facing the Reds. The Great American Ballpark ballpark has been a hitters park 3 out of the past 5 seasons, April and May have been the best for Overs there as well tapering off in June despite the heat picking up.
BOL always enjoy reading your NHL threads. |
NYBartender | 26 |
|
|
Sabres this season are now 7-4 as =>+200 dogs gotta be alot of parlays burned on those games. |
Dsr_9 | 12 |
|
|
Muh parlays everytime time someone complains about a big favorite losing. How are they considered and elite team idk how about having 111 points and leading the entire league but what do I know. Buffalo has been a pretty good upset team this season tbh they've upset Boston, Washington and Tampa and now Nashville from the looks of it. |
Dsr_9 | 12 |
|
|
Playoffs that is. |
RustyBuckets | 18 |
|
|
Don't go laying -200 against the Penguins versus the Capitals now. |
RustyBuckets | 18 |
|
|
When you have thoughts like that across the board you have to consider that you might be falling into a trap. Islanders can win but that's because Condon 5-10 and freaking 5 and I don't know what either team is playing for or why anybody would show up to the arena other than to waste time.
I also wouldn't like to be laying juice against the B's, Sharks or Flyers. |
RustyBuckets | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NYBartender:
QUOTE Originally Posted by MrSavant: QUOTE Originally Posted by Olop: glad you didnt pick the under friend lmfao, unders are never easy, and thats why i never bet them. UNDERS ARE FOR SUCKERS !!! I AGREE 1000% I HATE THEM OVER IS WHERE THE $$$ IS AT I'd say thats most likely absolutely inaccurate. In pretty much all walks of sports betting, the under is the money bet. 75% of betters are losers and those same 75% generally bet favorites and unders. The general public is always on Overs. Its a mindset wherein they always have a shot no matter how much time is left. Not saying I don't bet overs b/c I do, but in the long run I'd argue (just guessing) that the under pays out more than overs in the long run.
Ave total is 0.4 higher this season than the previous 5 seasons. Overs have been the money otherwise the books wouldn't have made the adjustment. |
MrSavant | 24 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.