Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Based on everything you said, wouldn't under 71.5 be a better bet? Seems like if the game goes the way you think, it would be way under that anyway, and that would give you a cushion in case TCU breaks some long TDs while trying to bleed the clock in the 3rd & 4th.
|
m15525 | 43 |
|
|
There's no chance this is true. Gates isn't a big gambler, and when he does it's low stakes.
|
MrFace | 14 |
|
|
replied to
How you could you guys possibly take +11 against a team with a mighty 19-16 ATS.....
in College Basketball Quote Originally Posted by lonniejoshua16: the Hampton game was not Vegas fault you can't with up 37 with 12 minutes to go and then they shut it down They were up 19 with 1:11 left against Cincinnati. |
VegasVandal | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Bleakhouse: Both teams hate scoring but we will see. THat is not a lot of points. Kentucky hates scoring?? Their 75 points per game is ranked 26th, and they're 9th in offensive efficiency. |
Rex99 | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Irisheric777: A 23 point win at Hampton isn't a blow out? Not when they could have won by 50+ if they wanted to. |
mikeru3 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AteamESP: I just hedged 345 to make 600.. on denver +3 just in case So now you're risking 3,000 to win 655... Seems like an even worse investment than before. |
AteamESP | 44 |
|
|
Seems like a horrible investment to me. If the Pelicans are everything you say (hot, rested, motivated) they should blow Den off the court and cover comfortably. But if the rest cooled them off, makes them rusty, and they take Den lightly they will lose outright. I feel like you're risking an extra $2,500 for no reason.
|
AteamESP | 44 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tito40: classic covers right here…guy asks a question. hoping for insight, maybe someone follows the team closely and can enlighten him on coaches tendencies or quotes they may have read, something like that…and while I agree its the conf champ and highly doubt the coach would do that, instead of just answering the question he gets bashed and told he's an idiot… bunch of a ssholes You're making it sound like this is a thing in college, that some coaches do it and some don't, but none of them do. It's like asking if Arkansas will defend with 4, and leave 1 guy on the other end to cherry pick. |
strippersnbens | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Susan31: how is any question dumb? I for one find it important bol strippersnbeans When was the last time a college team in a championship game pulled their starters early? |
strippersnbens | 18 |
|
|
They were 0-7 against the 3 best teams in their conference, and since they might not even be selected for the tournament, there's no value in 125-1.
|
Winning4Ever | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smacksmiter: Excellent observation. Another question here is why was the line so low to begin with?ed Wisconsin -6.5 opening line...I was thinking much more like -9.5 or -10. The books normally don't adjust that much for one player possibly being out. They played 2 weeks ago in Wisconsin, and the line was -9. Why would Wisc be a bigger favorite in championship game on a neutral court? |
ryno23 | 529 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by liljames3333: 1-0 up .3 units Thank you, that's all I was asking for. GL today |
liljames3333 | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by liljames3333: Lost 1 and that's cubs. I'm just trying to do my statistic. No need for anyone else to know. Y'all are haters. Dude, I'm not hating, I'm just asking how many units you win when it works? The numbers aren't a secret. I know you lose 2 units when it doesn't work, I was just hoping someone that is "betting" these games could save me the time of looking it all up and just tell me how many units they win when it works. It's super shady that you won't do that. |
liljames3333 | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by liljames3333: 7-0 Seriously, who cares about 7-0 without knowing what the profit/loss is? Post how many units you are up or down, with the record. |
liljames3333 | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by liljames3333: bash me im sorry. i feel 20-0 with being up money. i see me losing when its a 1 run game. sorry It's fine saying the system is 20-0, I just didn't understand what you were doing at 1st, and the title confused me.... But my point was how many units you are up/down is way more important than saying it has worked on 20 games. So yesterday, when the system works on all 8 games, how many units did you win? Would 1 game not working have wiped out the profit? |
liljames3333 | 41 |
|
|
You're not 20-0, you're 20-20 with a profit. How many units you are up?
|
liljames3333 | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PerfectParlay11: No way nba let's Miami down 2-0...those extra 20 free throws Indiana got game 1 will even out I think What the NBA wants most is for the Heat to be down 0-2. Casual fans still assume the finals will be a Heat/Spurs rematch, so they aren't watching conference finals. If Heat are down 0-2, the media will go nuts the next 3 days about the Heat being eliminated, and game 3 will have huge ratings. If you really believe the NBA controls games based on who they want to win, you should bet your bankroll on Pacers ML. |
PerfectParlay11 | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Twenty5Straight: Sunderland playing for their relegation lives the past month... With the way they've been playing, a draw doesn't look so bad against them. Man City -2 goals at -128 or so against a side such as Aston Villa is the type of bet gamblers dream of. Well, not really but almost. I would take City if I were you. I don't understand what is special about "a side such as Aston Villa?" This premier league season, they only have 2 away losses by more than 2 goals, and both were by 3 due to 90+ minute goals. |
Twenty5Straight | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Twenty5Straight: 3-3 in soccer -0.53 2-0 in nba +2.0From a motivational standpoint, Aston Villa really have nothing to play for other than pride. Villa will probably throw a bunch of young players into the fire today as well due to all their injuries. Do you really think City will let a game like this slip away at home? No way. At worst, we get a push. Manchester City -2 -128 They let the FA cup against Wigan slip away, as well as the game against Sunderland 3 weeks ago. |
Twenty5Straight | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mr_bollox: smush, last time barca played city it was 3-2, these two are a bit different from your average CL side. When was that? I can't find a record of it.... In the 2011 semi finals Barcelona won 2-0 at Real Madrid, then drew the 2nd leg 1-1. Since Barcelona isn't different than Barcelona, how is city different than Real Madrid in a way that will lead to more goals?
|
mr_bollox | 19 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.