Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
US program needs a complete overhaul. Starting with Gulati as the head all the way down to our youth levels. MLS is making other concacaf teams better but US weaker. We need to start sending our top level youth to Europe (ala Pulisic) at a young age. We also need an elite level world class coach who won't continue to play players who have no business still playing (beasley, bradley, etc)
|
saigonbynight | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by barneybeans: I think Argentina might make the playoff vs New Zealand. They ain't qualifying top 4 tonight. La concha de tu madre, forro pinchado! Chupala! Great win OP!
|
Hope77 | 5 |
|
|
Argentina is the dicey one. Not because of their opponent but because of the altitude. Argentina historically does not do well in altitude games.
That being said lets hope they win bc a world cup without Arg would be a travesty.
|
HoopsAndBases | 6 |
|
|
One more thing.. It's also wise to pay attention to senior nights at some colleges. These games sometimes win.. but from a logical stand point.. it runs counter-intuitive from the fundamental logic of the system so I exercise caution with these since in certain instances it gives extra incentive for the home team to play moitvated and many colleges promote these games more heavily t so that fan turnout is larger then normal for these games.
I'm selective with these and skipping some senior night games has saved me from extra loses.
|
ryno23 | 105 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends: Hi guys, As I understand from reading the various threads on this system, a lot of people can tweak and customize this system while keeping the basic rules in check. Has anyone tried and tracked playing all the games that fit the rule, except for the 'lined only' conferences ie. not eliminating picks based on conference? Would be interested to see if it makes that big a difference, since the crux of this system's success seems to be in finding overpriced favorites. I understand the theory behind taking 'lined only' conferences, I just wonder if you're not losing value since overpriced faves are overpriced, regardless. I'd be curious to see if anyone's already taken that logic and run with it. Sorry if someone already has and posted it. Good stuff and good discussion. This place needs more of that *Non-Lined Conferences. Just like Ryno, so long as every book has a line on the game and it fits parameters I play it. Last year these did well. This year it's about 50/50 on these. Never played prior to last yr. -As to the rest of all the non-lined conference games at the few select books that offer them.. one would add a lot more plays by playing these... adding too much variance for my liking. There's already a lot of plays as it is. On Saturday's it wouldn't be far-fetched to perhaps have 12-15+ games total including all these non lined conf games (weak conf = poorly ranked favs). And then there's personal cbb games one might play on top of that. System has been good throughout as is and IMO, even this year where the profit has been merely decent (all of it from this week gains), it's still profit so I don't mess around w/ those games. Other system trends I've noticed over the past few yrs: *If a play opened <+6.5 and then moves to >+6.5, these plays on average tend to lose more than win. On the flipside if a play opens at >+6.5, then moves <+6.5... these plays tend to hit (even though technically it's no longer a system play per say). I don't play or play these respectivley night before game based on movement from BOL Opener. *There isn't any difference b/ween ranking 180 and 160. I've been playing #160 this whole time and it hasn't negativley affected my ROI. |
ryno23 | 105 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BigBoiHarris: how the hell has this system ever been profitable? i mean these aren't even close...(troll but true) Been playing a slightly modified version of this system for several years. System never failed to produce a profit for me. That being said, if you can't handle the swings then by all means stop playing. The less mushes playing the system the better...
|
ryno23 | 105 |
|
|
Yep. Win/lose; cover/ not cover.. you can always depend on Navy fighting till the very end. Love wagering on these guys and no longer go against them on large spreads (learned my lesson with the Houston game earlier this season)
|
Navi | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Aceholes: navy has a horrid defense especailly on passing defense latech rolllllllls 35-17 Surprised you didn't clutter this thread with 3 pages of spazzed out posts calling La Tech's defense pathetic jokes.
|
THE_PRESIDENT | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty : bwhat roughing the passer looks like if that was roughing the passer... Targeting, I can at least see the argument, even tho it wasn't. But that was a horrible call And what about all the phantom PI calls that were called on Navy in the 2nd half. I'm not referring to the interception in the end zone in the 4th that was nullified. But the other ones in the 2nd half.. specifically the one where the incomplete pass by La Tech would have made it something like 3rd and 15. . Bad calls go both ways.
|
wheaty | 12 |
|
|
Please keep posting.
These types of threads have saved me from so many losing wagers..
|
JordanKing23 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Tailgatingcats: Hang in there perderson. Peaks and valleys. One week your a god in here and the next they want you dead. Not easy to cap this stuff. Vegas makes adjustments. No football so cappers are sharpening up. Good day to lay off. Lotta guys getting drilled today. Best of luck down the road. His capping isn't the problem. He's 57% over 175 plays. He's a very good cbb capper even with this bad run. It's his money management that's the problem and what's been biting him in the behind. But most punters have that issue including me so I'm not one to throw stones. Win or lose though the man's 100% transparent with his record. Have to respect that |
pederson16 | 2191 |
|
|
Well done Beantown. You're seeing the ball real well.
GL on Pacific tonight.
|
BeantownMiracle | 34 |
|
|
I just locked in Denv -3.5. I believe they're the play here.
But you're right. Nothing I hate worst then seeing so many people on the forums on the same side as you. But a capper I respect is on them so I went with it... No way I can ride with a team playing in the altitude on it's 3rd road game in 4 days off an emotional 2OT win against the best team in the league. If Denver fails to cover so be it.
|
YELAWOLF | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by suuma: Hopefully you guys saw the bigger picture in last nights game. NFL wants Luck in the playoffs. Our +500 Future looking good. Congrats on your win. But absolutely disgusted being on the wrong side of that.
|
suuma | 131 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Clownin101: Im a Huston backer and won .. dont feel sorry for me please.. buying the hook saved the cash out Game was at 6.5.. Never hit 7 at any major offshore. If you bought to a full point to 7.5 and cashed this one, good job. But if you do that often enough you'll get eaten up long term by the vig and go broke and when you do make sure to post and we'll just feel sorry for you then instead..
|
MaxMoneyMaker | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dethwish: If you think people get paid off to throw games, why do you still gamble? By the same theory 98% of gamblers lose long term yet we all still gamble???? If you're a gambler it's in your blood. Just gotta hope to be on the right side of the BS when it eventually goes down.
|
MaxMoneyMaker | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TreyInventor: But over 80% of pub was on Oak tho I don't understand why Vegas let them cover like that. They needed Hou bad Why do people continuously refer to Vegas as the Wizard of Oz behind the screen pulling all the strings. Only 10% of the gambling handle goes to Vegas. 90% goes offshore!!!!!
|
MaxMoneyMaker | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd: Taking my 11k and walking away from this shi.t product the NFL is today. Officially retireing from this mess....better to focus on family life is short....best of luck to my covers brothers Beyond frustrating loss for sure. We got robbed of one! Take the next few days and shake it off. You have a great profitable system. When you cool down you'll realize this again and come back to the thread. |
AFNfootballnerd | 317 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TAMU04: This is where you're wrong Mr. High IQ guy. I only asked the question once. You clog up the thread with your bitchin and moaning because somebody asked a question, instead of answering the question and adding substance for the people new to the thread. You don't hear me going crazy about that. So sit down and shut the fuk up. It's people like you that I would like to slap right in the adam's apple. A slap in the adam's apple. Hey Jackie Chan. Instead of making empty threats behind an anonymous username, you might be better of working on that reading comprehension of yours and re-read my post. I led you to the answer dum dum. But if by busy you mean visualizing nunchuck moves, then that's on you Napoleon Dynamite. |
AFNfootballnerd | 317 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TAMU04: Hey I got an idea how bout you and jrod go darn yourself. I'm not going back to read the whole friggin thread you dipshits. Answer the damn question or gtfo! I don't have time for you little girl to get your panties in a wad! No you GTFO. It's so annoying having lazy low IQ dummies like yourself clog up the thread by asking the same question over and over again when it's being answered constantly. You don't have to read the whole thread dum dum! Just read the OP. Or go back a few pages.
|
AFNfootballnerd | 317 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.