Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ok ok ...... Anyone wants to give me some insight on the O/U?!?!?!
|
Covers | 186 |
|
|
Haven't posted in awhile but here we go. I could care less about these teams so no biased picks from me. I don't buy into the BS of "a team needs this win so they win win" retarded! I do think that Harbaugh is hungrier, along with the 9ers. He can prep like no other. And...well Washington nor RGIII have given me any reason to believe that they have what it takes. 49ers will roll tonight! I will be surprised if the Skins can put up 13 pts tonight, and have no doubt 49ers will have anything less than 24-31. Taking 49ers -6 pretty convincingly! Staying away from O/U bc that could go either way depending on how many 49ers throw up! If I had to say anything it would be the Under.
31-13 49ers! |
Covers | 82 |
|
|
Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over! Packers 34 Seahawks 23 |
Covers | 151 |
|
|
Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over! Packers 34 Seahawks 23 |
Covers | 151 |
|
|
Putting a "G" on a 7 teaser. Pack +3.5, and over 39. Profit $760. No Brainer!
|
Covers | 151 |
|
|
No way in hell Penn St will be 100% focused on the Huskers. I can tell you this....Nebraska is fired up and Pelini will have his team ready, especially after last weeks loss. This is gonna be a big ass whooping. 41-13. NEBRASKA!!!
|
Covers | 83 |
|
|
Western Mich have a better passing game than Toledo, and better defense. Western Mich is the better choice. I wouldn't touch the o/u with a ten foot pole. Under if i had to say!
WM +12 |
Covers | 60 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:
N ILL and the rest of the mac too simple to have let downs. Not in a major conf. They will be too strong for smoka bowla green. If it were a less explosive team I would take a bigd undah but not with these simplots!!!! N Ill and OV for the reasonable!!!!!!!! You're so right about NIU and Over being the reasonable, and that's exactly why i'm doing the total opposite. I'm feeling better and better about BG and under by the minute. |
Covers | 76 |
|
|
Oh yeah.......Definite Under. |
Covers | 76 |
|
|
Seen this confusing line too many times this year. NIU on paper should cover, but the home dog will probably win straight up. That's how it's been going ever since week four. NIU big win last week = let down the next. BG +6 is definitely the play here. |
Covers | 76 |
|
|
27 - 9 Pitt. Mark my words!
|
Covers | 41 |
|
|
Everything says Mich. Why is the line only 4? Vegas knows something.
|
Covers | 22 |
|
|
Ok fellas, i've been researching this all week. Nebraska will be running the ball all day. High winds during the game tomorrow so i'm not seeing a lot of passing. NW is terrible against the run. This alone will keep the clock running more than usual. Polini gave out the blackshirts this week in practice, so the defense is gonna be all kinds of jack'd up! Having said that.....Nebraska covers fairly easily, and this game is coming in under.
Neb 41 NW 16 |
Covers | 10 |
|
|
This game is gonna die down. -14 & Under 63, still looking good. Oh yeah.....who cares that i teased, winning is winning! That is the goal right?????
|
Covers | 83 |
|
|
High scoring games when USC plays winning teams. Low scoring games when they play losing teams. Weird but true! Colorado actually looks like they are getting worse as the year goes on, and USC looks like they're getting better. 6 teasing: -14 & Under 63.
Good Luck Ya'll! |
Covers | 83 |
|
|
At first glance, USC should cover easily! Then i remembered that if a line looks suspicious......there's a reason! Why 20 pts?
|
Covers | 83 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah: O.K. my fellow cappers - I'm letting you in on a secret I've been doing each week with college football. I wanted to make sure my "strategy" worked before I divulged it to the public. I've simply been moneylining and parlaying the favorites together. Here's my rule (and of course, there are exceptions - like Oregon this week) - - at least minus 15 points for a home team, and/or minus 17 for a road team........... Confused? - O.K., here's my parlay for this week - and it pays +130 USC Miami Nebraska TCU Air Force Oregon Stanford Oklahoma State Tennessee Done, one whopping bet - I haven't lost one yet (watch, this'll be the week) I don't have to worry about points or any of that crap - and I can use these winnings to lose the following day on pro football Good Luck everybody............ Ha...did the same thing in week three. Had miami ml against k st. along with three others that came in. Lost $500. Just remember....there's always an upset. Good Luck! |
Covers | 83 |
|
|
Here is the LOCK! I'm taking BC +14.5, so take FLORIDA ST. -14.5. I can't hit a game to save my life! |
Covers | 59 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NEVERgo4less: Good point about the bye week!! Can anyone tell me what happened to Temple @ BGreen?? the spread was Temple -12. I want to take Temple but Bgreen and Ohio has the same stats which scares me. Did Pierce play @ Bgreen?? BGSU isn't a bad team, every team has a bad game, and temple didn't play very good. Call it a fluke! All the more reason to take temple this week. They PO'd. |
Covers | 95 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by NEVERgo4less]
Good point about the bye week!! Can anyone tell me what happened to Temple @ BGreen?? the spread was Temple -12. I want to take Temple but Bgreen and Ohio has the same stats which scares me. Did Pierce play @ Bgreen?? [/Quote....Pierce did play but got hurt earlier. Brown stepped up and ran for 119 yds. Pierce isn't 100% and will share time with Brown. They will run it down the bobcats throats. Defense which is well rested.......easy win for temple. should come in under also. 31-10. |
Covers | 95 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.