Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Darnell F'n McDonald. Ties it in the 8th and wins it 1 inning later. |
GameHunter | 82 |
|
|
Now, after a 2 out walk, he finally pulls Masset for Lincoln. Why the hell was Masset brought in in the first place? OK, maybe give him a shot and see if he's on, but he's gotta have a super short leash. TBH, any decent manager would've just had Lincoln work the entire inning then get to your closer.
|
GameHunter | 82 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by dcd1220:
Dusty baker is a horrible manager on the verge of blowing a 4 run lead Seriously, what the fuck is Dusty doing? Brings in Masset w/a 4 run lead, bases empty, 1 out. Masset gives up a single and double, any manager with half a brain would pull him here. Masset gives up an RBI single, still Dusty keeps him in. 3 run HR, to tie the game, still Dusty keeps him in. What a freakin joke. |
GameHunter | 82 |
|
|
Both teams with 9 hits and 1 error and the Cubs are getting slaughtered.
|
BigFrank420 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by smac38:
it never ceases to amaze me how mnay people constantly think that is how many runners have been stranded... Yah, it really is a stupid stat b/c you could load the based with no outs, have 2 guys K, and then have a grand slam. In reality, all the runners are scored, but according to that stupid stat, 6 men were left on base. |
BigFrank420 | 46 |
|
|
Man on 3rd, 1 out and both Soto and Nady fail to drive it in by striking out. 0 for 7 with RISP. It's not like they're facing Halladay or Lincecum either, it's freakin' Niese. What a disgrace |
BigFrank420 | 46 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VGPOP:
Are the Mets swinging because now that they have lead they want to go home? (or hotel)? I would imagine so. If Bill Gates said he'd give them all a 1 billion bonus for getting 5 runs off Mather they probably pull it off 70% of the time. |
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
How the hell does Mather get Reyes-Castillo-Wright out all in a row? This is just sad.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by VGPOP:
If Mets are smart and don't swing, this guy should load bases and they can score in bunches and game can still go OVER. They've already established time and again they aren't smart, the question is whether they're borderline retarded or completely retarded. |
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Reyes and Bay a combined 0-14 up to this point.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
I wanna see a ball hit to Lohse too.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by spark70:
just curious. I'm on the Mets, but if they offered to cancel ur wager on this game would u take it? Me, I'd flip a coin....Heads= Yes, Tails = No! If Manuel wasn't a fuckin retard the Mets would be -1200 or so in the 20th inning if K-Rod can go again, no reason they shouldn't put up 5 runs on Mather, he can't even throw a damn strike. |
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Where the hell did the 3rd pitch to Pujols go? It doesn't even show up on MLB Gameday.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Lohse due up 3rd?
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Only the fuckin' Mets could figure out a way to get 2 outs vs. a guy who's pitched 17 balls and 4 strikes.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Did Bay charge the mound after being hit? That would be pretty hilarious.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Mets win this game.............Manuel should be fired tomorrow
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
If my coach had such little confidence in me that he asked me to bunt vs. a position player, I'd probably just kill myself.
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Holy fuckin shit, did you seriously fuckin bunt vs. Mather?
|
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
|
Mather can't throw a strike, just stop sign every Met hitter until a 2 strike count please. |
revengeissweet1 | 702 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.