Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by ThaCollecTAH: So let me get this straight, you open your thread with all this lock bullshit....then go on saying how hot you are and that we should "trust you"...u have 150 posts lol, nobody is going to trust you. THEN, you randomly pop in a comment that you are getting nervous and for us to be careful?? Hahahaha Get the fuck out of here you joke Says the guy with 200. Unless you have the balls to post your own plays. Don't go bashing others you person. |
birdman78 | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood: the funny thing about this is... if anyone had bothered to do their homework, they would know that Denver hasn't covered a spread against Indy since like pre-2000... Manning owns that secondary... it's as simple as that... Baltimore, too... Manning owns the Broncos and Ravens, and until he retires you shouldn't be betting either of those teams when they play Indy... Your right... Gonna keep that trend in consideration in the future. |
jasondemz | 60 |
|
|
My advice would be to quit for the rest of the season... and save up a bankroll before you go back at it (If ya do)... Or decrease the units of your wagering to one which is affordable (50$ a game... hey you can win dinner money for the lady)... Definately don't risk making it worse though...
|
birdsword | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Berty: Hey buddy - congrats on the good picks. I'm actually in a similar boat as I picked all 14 right too. I've boxed the Monday nighter so I don't have to worry about losing. Last year I won on a 13 game card and the payout was around $500 with approx 1200 people winning. Since this is a 15 game card, I'd say that if Arizona wins, the payout will be around $1000-$2000 for each winner, but a lot more if SF pulls it out. Like Master Fader said, there weren't any huge upsets, so it's not like anyone will be winning over 200k like 3 lucky idiots did last week. But there were a lot of games with small spreads like Miami/Jax, Philly/NYG, Buff/KC and Wash/Oak which probably had people divided (at least that's what I'm hoping). Ya those were the games a lot of people boxed, and the others were straight forward. Probably a lot of winners, so i wouldn't hedge if I was this guy. |
thermoplyae | 19 |
|
|
This thread is for fellow Ontarions
Haha WTG man! This week seemed slightly easier for the pools card, and there was about 4 games that were tough, which could all simply be boxed. You should still win a 4 digit number. Someweeks, theres 1 guy who wins like 250 000. Good luck man, Personally I believe in letting my bets ride, as its the mathematically correct decision in terms of payouts. Maybe your pic will be in next thursday sheets n you'll be famous for a few days!!!! |
thermoplyae | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by marnypoly: I actually like the Bengals this week. Agreed. Bengals are in a good position to bounce back, and NEED to win this, if they are going to get that 2nd seed... Chargers are at home too, Cinci winning SU is unlikely. However, Vegas opened the line at Cinci +7. Cinci's secondary is way better then the Cowboys and should keep the bolts weapons in check. Predicting a close game where the huge spread covers. |
nbafan88 | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by howzuck: Cowboys have been bad, but Romo has'nt been the last 2 weeks. Why can't their kicker make that FG? Why couldn't they get in the end zone with 4 cracks from the 1 yard line? Why couldn't they make one stop on the Chargers in 4th quarter? I don't know who to blame, it will end up being Wade Phillips, but Romo has played good enough to win the last 2 games. Funny thing, if they collapse, it will put the Giants in the playoffs undeservedly, but Cowboys are at Saints, at Washington and home to Eagles. Does anyone think they can win more than one of those games? They will finish 9-7,out of the playoffs. and Jason Garret or Mike Shanahan will be coaching them next year. Dude, why do Cowboys backers always have to blame someone. Just admit you guys got outplayed by a much better team. With the ammount of missed Pass Interference calls on that horrible Cowboys secondary, Chargers coulda won by more. But who cares?!?!?!? Cowboys just need better Offensive coaching, and a much better secondary. The only thing they have right besides their run game is their cheer leaders (and their sexy calender) |
nbafan88 | 17 |
|
|
IF THAT! Washington is 6-0 ATS their last 6 games...
In terms of who wins SU, Recalls Washington leading 6-0 and loosing 7-6 with a minute left their last meeting. Washington is improving their level of play every week due to their bad beats. Whereas the Cowgirls are sliding as expected in December. Overrated Dallas definately will not make playoffs. They beat one team with a winning record all year... a close game to Phili lol... |
nbafan88 | 17 |
|
|
1 last thing, before I stop proving what a moron your really are. |
46989 | 27 |
|
|
Sucking so much that Romo lately has been seen in the center of Bukkake.
|
nbafan88 | 17 |
|
|
Spanked for going against an obvious trend I'd say.... |
46989 | 27 |
|
|
Lol, that 'Chargers are overated in december' thread was the biggest joke I have ever read. Although the Cowboys backers made very evident points on why to choose the Chargers.
Rivers has the highest december QB rating in NFL history... (Pretty sure history, if not, the stat was the last several seasons anyways....) Chargers and Ravens (Even the eagles to some extent)... mark my words, pick those franchises for the last few games in the season EVERY YEAR. Every year they roll near the end, every year they send me cake for x-mas. Every year they get off to a slow start and get condemned for it, only to redeem themselves. |
nbafan88 | 17 |
|
|
|
BUBBA_ARMY48 | 38 |
|
|
Dallas is always a sucker bet. If the line was produced on how wellthe teams are playing, SD would of been a favourite. |
burley | 30 |
|
|
NO and Colts superbowl aint happening. Both teams are lacking balance needed to control a serious postseason game. |
Jayw23 | 10 |
|
|
Great minds think alike homie.
|
BIGfnPOO | 4 |
|
|
Wow... I would take Nostradamus over Brandon Lang anyday... Nostradamus must get his picks from MrBator |
jayjay81 | 22 |
|
|
Agree both ways. But ofcourse if pre-game discussion gets heated... It calls for a little bit of deserved gloating.
For example: This week my biggest peeve was "San Diego is overrated in december because of who they played"... People's only reasoning for picking the America's moneymaker, the Cowgirls. Sometime's a lil 'I told you so' is expected.... At other times I appreciate the compliments. |
Whodeysb09 | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner: thanks for the fades I'd like to establish this guy as secretely having the smallest bankroll remaining on covers. Just a random observation since becoming a 'Covers Degenerate' this season, He rarely posts plays... but BigNiner consistantly goes on threads with winning plays and post 'THANKS FOR THE FADE BUDDY'. He even chose Dallas.... I think San Diego this week was the most obvious play I have ever made in my gambling career! Ofcourse when he does make picks, instead of fading others, he still looses. So my advice to everyone. If this dude fades it, it's a very good play NOT TO FADE. |
sammy11 | 92 |
|
|
Arizona San Diego superbowl IMO!
Prediction of that game... Over 87.5 or whatever the hell they would put it. Would be the sickest passing game ever produced in a Super Bowl.... |
Jayw23 | 10 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.