Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1H seattle 2H denver |
Covers | 409 |
|
|
win is a win, loss is a loss... never never under estimate your opponent. an overtime would be perfect here.
|
Covers | 149 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by lordzud:
Sammy's analysis is excellent. There is no doubt that Green Bay has a HUGE home field advantage when they play in Green Bay in January verses a team from a mild weather city. That is why the line is where it is at. If this was a regular season game I would make this a no play, leaning towards Green Bay. But since it is one and done playoffs I'm betting San Fran gets it done in spite of the weather. The cold makes for more passes dropped and the ground is hard as concrete. Usually the winds are stronger as well. San Fran can and will dominate the line of scrimmage. The only two things Green Bay has going for it is the freezing cold and their fantastic QB. I think the cold and the wind will make this more of a low scoring running game, both push this into San Fran's favor. The Green Bay defense stinks, their pass rush stinks, and fragile Rodgers is going to be slammed into that frozen turf multiple times while Kapernick will have plenty of time to throw and plenty of opportunities to use his speed to run for first downs. It's playoffs, your running QB's risk runs that they wouldn't in a regular season game so that will be another San Fran advantage. San Fran -2.5 very right.... that healed collar bone in the freezing cold,, and face the sf D.... |
Covers | 106 |
|
|
SD always choke under pressure. I remember they let a team convert on a 4th and 32 with a short pass in the final minutes and lost that game a year ago. many times they had allowed back door..... I would fade sd throughout..... |
Covers | 78 |
|
|
a few playoff back when Smith was qb for SF against Giants. under 2 final minutes and SF got the ball at Giants @10yds. all Smith got to do was sit to kill the clock and kick a winning fg. Instead, he ran in for a td. Eli came back....and won it in overtime AND the championship that season. next season, Smith got cut, and playing for KC...... COLTS seems to be more motivated.
|
Covers | 94 |
|
|
very over |
Covers | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:
Beware teasers look likes a teaser buster!!! Teams in must wins usually get blasted. Brown and black makes doody!!! true.... but apply mostly to team that has motivations. the Brown lost everything when they lost that last home game. I just don't see the Browns go out playing a GOOD last game to farewell their coach. no hate here, just a perspective. |
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
Pats lost to Cincinnati earlier in the season, so if they lose and the Bengals win, I believe Cinci gets that #2 spot. So, if The Hoodie & Co. with all that they have on the line for this game at home where they're undefeated this season can't beat the Buffalo Bills by at least 2 TD's then they don't even deserve to be in the playoffs at all Pats minus whatever YEP.... also it's raining..... cant tackles, rubber gloves.... OVER |
Covers | 21 |
|
|
this, I remember.... Lions suck end of month in December because their coaches don't know how the make proper adjustments ( last 8...1-7 ATS). so, consider this fact if anyone sided with Detroit. |
Covers | 31 |
|
|
I take the OVER. I just cant see the hawks will be walkin into the playoff having less than 4tds here (10pts previous game). and the rams have improved since..... last time this happened to the hawks, the total went 51pt.
|
Covers | 14 |
|
|
navy gives 13- is a good value. what worry me is that navy does not have a good records when laying DD, and very poor records after a 2-week break ( 1-7 ats). regards to the snow.. most game from last week went over in the 4th quarter. therefore, you cant say snow=over. but I can say that bad tackling will make it harder to tackle in the snow. with that said, army + over. |
Covers | 54 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fan1ranger:
I don't know,I keep hearing these Navy backers making the clain that Navy's defense is much better then Army,but the fact of the matter is,Navy give up a total of 419 yards per gm.,whereas Army
have given up 417 yd per Gm.,so please tell me how Navy is so much better defensively then Army.
I'm telling you right now,that Army will win this game outright.
Cannot tell you how much I love Army in this game,or maybe I have.Lol
wow... I like your post. keep postin |
Covers | 54 |
|
|
sharp is on NO, but line comes down to 3. I am on Caro, not because of fading the public, but playing against a team that thinks they can recover from any road loses. well, not tonight....
|
Covers | 34 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Next1:
Saints should hand out 75,000 free Brown bags for there fans to wear over there heads tonight when there losing the game that they ultimately lose risk 185 to win 100 on the saints who almost lost to the falcons fools! Next1, thanks for the insight.... would lock it??? |
Covers | 34 |
|
|
the teams are try to develop these 2 qb for 2014,,,, they will toss. OVER |
Covers | 13 |
|
|
pitt
|
Covers | 30 |
|
|
over over over
|
Covers | 26 |
|
|
pitt
|
Covers | 30 |
|
|
utal st!!!
|
Covers | 27 |
|
|
auburn + under!!!
|
Covers | 57 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.