Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oakland lost by only 3 to SD in October at home. Division match-up... I won't be laying 10.5. Give me Oakland to lose by a TD or so.
|
Covers | 16 |
|
|
Mallet is absolutely atrocious in what I've seen from him. Watching him in the preseason this year was painful. I wouldn't be surprised if he had a 20% completion percentage in this game. I don't think he's even accurate enough to be picked off. Lots of balls thrown at receiver's feet most likely. Texans defense will play tough, but I don't see the Texans offense scoring more than 13 points. I'll take the home team at the Dawg Pound. Good luck all
|
Covers | 20 |
|
|
I don't like this line. Houston should be favored and that's why I'm leaning Titans. Still gotta read into this a little more
|
Covers | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stalker:
The Jets are scoring 27? They only managed that much 4 times last year and one was against the Raiders and the other two were against the Colts and Bengals the last 2 weeks of the regular season when those teams rested their starters most of the game. And why would the Jets get Adalius Thomas, a linebacker, to replace Jenkins, a nosetackle? And Haynesworth is already unhappy playing in the Redskins 3-4 defense. What makes you think he'd jump at the chance to play in the Jets 3-4? That's a great idea to trade for an unhappy, unmotivated player who just signed a 7-year $100 million contract last year Hahaha Awesome. I was just about to post something similar. obviously, I'm a Patriots fan, but Sanchez hasn't looked ready since stepping foot in the NFL. He could have been a great QB if he finished out his college years, but now I'm not so sure. I was nervous about the Pats D this year, and still am. But if they can play D like they did last week, they will be a force. Special teams weapon Brandon tate... How fast did that guy look returning the ball? If the spread was 3.5 I would be taking the Jets, but at just 2.5, there's no way. GL All |
Covers | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by michwil3535:
@breakabookie... off the top of my head I can think of three home games Miami lost last year... week 2 vs colts, home vs saints, and home vs Texans as well as home vs Steelers...so no they were not undefeated at home... way to just make up facts to make your play look stronger.
He said Minn |
Covers | 35 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
The Cowboys (but more specifically, Tony Romo) has shown this isn’t the same Cowboy team from the last few seasons. Boy did Tony make me look like a dink last week haha |
Covers | 56 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by misfit_aka:
my logic : vegas is forgetting MINN does not need to play starters whole game. they are not getting a bye!!! it will end close. Vegas is forgetting something?? Haha I don't think so. I agree with you, though. G-Men |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
Wait, wait. The reason the Cowboys won last week was because they were playing in a dome? I really hope you are kidding otherwise you might be legally retarded; in which case I apologize for making fun of the handicap. The guys that are still claiming that Romo sucks in December crack me up. The last 3 games in December Romo is 82 for 119, with 953 passing yards, 6 TD’s and no picks. Damn, those sure are some shitty numbers. Romo will throw his usual 2 or 3 “pics”? Romo hasn’t thrown more than one pick in a game since September. But hey, don’t let a little thing like the facts get in your way of attempting to make an argument.
All I'm saying. Tony Romo hasn't proven he can play well in December and take his team to the playoffs? Could he prove that FACT wrong this year? Possibly, but I doubt it. I'm not a Cowboy hater either, but if all their fans are like your sorry ass, then maybe I should reconsider. This site isn't about talking crap, and that's not what I intend to do. I'm here to share my opinion and see the opinions of others. And by the way, I took Dallas last week. |
Covers | 80 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Gusfgz:
The Cowboys won against the Saints to lose with the Redskins? It must be a joke! No way the Cowboys will letdown against a divisional rivals with the playoffs on his face. Plus they have 2 more day rest to keep focus, the Redskins are hungry? Give me a break! on short rest and with this play called at the end of the first half they really want this season must be end today! GUS Tony Romo is aweful in Dallas in December. They won last week cause they were in a dome in a controlled environment. Romo will throw his usual 2-3 pics, and Washington will stay within 3, and maybe even win outright. Remember what Dallas did last year? They can't finish! |
Covers | 80 |
|
|
Vegas wants people to think what half of you are. That Indy has nothing to play for. Does anyone actually believe they don't want to round off their season the way they played it all the way through? The Colts have clinched the playoffs. Have they clinched home field advantage? I just can't see the Colts letting the Jags end their streak. I can't bring myself to go against INdy at this point.
|
Covers | 130 |
|
|
Giants have been scoring lately. Hopefully they keep it up this week. I'll give Philly the point. Pretty sure Westbrook won't be playing this week.
|
Covers | 83 |
|
|
Tony Romo absolutely sucks in December. Bolts will eat him up. Easily winning SU
|
Covers | 72 |
|
|
Pat's have only beat 1 team by more than 10 points this year. Their D is pretty aweful most games. I'll take Car and the points. Pat's win by 10 at the most, but I don't even see that, really. Brady left the game last week and went straight to the locker room. Haven't heard anything since, but the commentators of the game seemed to think it was a finger injury. The Pat's need to start performing or they're going nowhere in the playoffs. Until they start winning games like they have been the past few years, I'm not giving anyone that many points.
|
Covers | 35 |
|
|
Cinci doesn't score enough to keep close to this powerhouse offense. Vike's should win by at least 10. Probably like 35-24
|
Covers | 40 |
|
|
Forgot to mention Portis is out. Rock who? I don't think they have a chance
|
Covers | 86 |
|
|
I thought the Pats would win SU last week, and wow, was I wrong. NO is a power house, and if they can do what they did to Brady and the boys last week, no one will even come close. Five TD's to five receivers? Drew Brees is an animal. Washington has a great pass defense, but I highly doubt they contain this beast. Plus, they can't score. Loving NO here by 2 TD's
|
Covers | 86 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Philly215:
Houston here for me, ill continue with my strong opinion that Jax is garbage, how they won 6 games at this point is beyond me. I ahd them at 5-11 for the year. My thoughts exactly |
Covers | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:
where did you get that information?
The guy's an idiot. just trying to throw everyone off. He has no useful information. Same with afasamoan or whatever the hell it is |
Covers | 37 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by afasamoan:
With Bulger back the dogs look tasty but then again with Steven Jackson done for the season maybe not. I love the Bears even though Hesters out
Wow, I hope no one takes this guy's posts seriously |
Covers | 28 |
|
|
Can anyone say shoot out? I feel like a mistake on offense could lose it for either one of these teams, COME ON PATS!!! |
Covers | 208 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.