Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
replied to
Why would Belichek defer and put the worst defense in the league on the field?
in NFL Betting
because he taped the giants practices' and knows all there plays..why else?
|
jigsy | 18 |
|
|
wah, wah you little bitch...
|
Patsfan1975 | 9 |
|
|
i'll book that bet for +600...you should have wiped you ass with that money..at least you would have got some value .....lmfao
|
dalegend | 11 |
|
|
But aren't you afraid you'll be called an "uncle tom" ??
The labels used to describe Americans of African descent mark the movement of a people from the slave house to the White House. Today, many are resisting this progression by holding on to a name from the past: "black."\\\\ https://news.yahoo.com/blacks-insist-im-not-african-american-181257715.html;_ylt=AgYMW00i8IB7h3e0jKSwzWrNt.d_;_ylu=X3oDMTRvcmpwMTY3BGNjb2RlA2dtcHRvcDEwMDBwb29sd2lraXVwcmVzdARtaXQDTmV3cyBmb3IgeW91BHBrZwMxNGMyNmYyYy0zNmY5LTM3MmMtYjc1NC03YmQzZDYxZWY5M2UEcG9zAzEEc2VjA25ld3NfZm9yX3lvdQR2ZXIDMmFkYTRhNDAtNGY1Yy0xMWUxLWFmZjYtMjJjNTNlNTRhYmI4;_ylg=X3oDMTNoanIyc3Q2BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDOWU0NTJmMjItNjk5NS0zNWUwLWFmNTUtMzNmZThkNDVjY2UyBHBzdGNhdANwb2xpdGljc3xkZXN0aW5hdGlvbjIwMTIEcHQDc3RvcnlwYWdlBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3 |
BigK22 | 8 |
|
|
replied to
So doesn't 17-8 record with wins over absolutly NO ONE make Diaz an average UFC fighter?
in Mixed Martial Arts |
refer | 27 |
|
|
alves is a one -dimensional fighter who is past his prime. Kampmann is one of the most underrated fighters in the UFC and WILL WIN THIS FIGHT.
Kampmann by U dec. |
TheBau5 | 14 |
|
|
What the Little lady diaz' problem is, is that if you don't fight to his/her strengths the bitch calls you out as being a box. diaz sucks at wrestling, so if you wrestle her, you're a box. She likes to tee off on flat footed fighters who stand right in front of her, so if you show good footwork and work to avoid damage, you're a box Carlos Condit DID NOT do a Kalib Starnes last night |
BigK22 | 33 |
|
|
Condit vs.Diaz: Why The Right Man WonSometime around 60AD, the civilized world lay prostrate beneath the Roman Empire's ruthless sandal. Rome had conquered every enemy to every point of the compass, not by the size of the army it deployed, but by the science with which it approached battle. Republican Rome had the world's first standing professional army, and developed military strategy and tactics into an advanced art that repeatedly gave it the edge over less-disciplined enemies. However, in the Roman province we now call Britain, a massive uprising was led by Boadicea, the legendary warrior queen of the Iceni. Provoked into rebellion by the rape of her daughters and humiliation of her people, she led her furious hordes on a rampage of looting and murder, sacking major towns populated by Roman settlers. Unprepared for the uprising, the Roman governor Suetonius had on hand an army of only a few thousand men. On short notice, he hurried to London, a major Roman settlement. Then word came: Boadicea was approaching, and she was hungry for blood. What would Suetonius do? Like Carlos Condit faced with the approach of the ruthless Barbarian Nick Diaz, he retreated. Despite the derogatory opinion often held of retreating generals, as a trained tactician Suetonius knew that retreat is not necessarily an act of cowardice or a source of shame. Rather, it is often the first step in winning a fight on your own terms. At this point, it would seem that Boadicea had the initiative, forcing the Roman into retreat. But a battle is not decided by who has what we might call battlefield control. It is decided by the tally of bloodied corpses when battle is finally joined. And battle was not yet joined. Like Nick Diaz, Boadicea's fighting strategy was simple: she overwhelmed her opponents with irresistible force. She marshaled every able-bodied member of her tribe and advanced like a swarm of starving locusts. After Suetonius' retreat, she overran London and visited slaughter and destruction on the town. Her strategy of overwhelming force and violent attack had prevailed again. High on victory, she set her sights on driving the Romans out of Britain altogether. Like Diaz, she was forcing the pace- but was she winning? It would seem so. Suetonius gathered together the few Roman divisions he could muster, but still had at his disposal only around 10,000 men. Boadicea's fighting force however, reportedly numbered up to 230,000. If Suetonius went head-on against her, he would be celebrated in history's chronicles for his courage. He would also be mercilessly slaughtered. So preferring life to glory, the wily general crafted a less confrontational strategy that would turn Boadicea's strength and aggression into a weakness. First, he carefully chose his battle ground. He selected a gap in a dense forest to be the site of the imminent showdown. This narrow corridor formed a cul-de-sac that would make it impossible for Boadicea to deploy her army on a wide front. The site was also sloping, meaning that one army would have to be running uphill during the fight, while the other would be running downhill. Then having set the stage, he lured her into battle. True to her wont, Boadicea rushed forward, her entire tribe in tow. Lacking any kind of disciplined formation, she swarmed towards the Romans. Suetonius then began a disciplined retreat, luring Boadicea into the gap in the woods. Like Nick Diaz, Boadicea did what had always worked: she attacked with the full measure of her fury. Positioned deep in his gap in the woods, Suetonius was as calm and focused as Carlos Condit as he waited for Boadicea to lose the battle. And lose she did. Unable to swarm the Romans because of the narrow field, her army presented a narrow front but long tail. Running uphill, she was also working twice as hard as her adversaries and tired quickly. Her characteristic brute force and aggression was completely neutralized, and she found her army clinically decimated by the Romans, who efficiently picked off her fighters with well-placed sword thrusts under the guard. She was the aggressor, forcing the pace, but each Roman sword thrust was like a Gary Condit leg kick, scoring patiently but effectively. After the first wave of Boadicea's attack was exhausted, the battle displayed the dynamics of the Condit-Diaz fight at the start of the third round. Gaining confidence, the Romans started to advance. However, they did so in disciplined formation, maintaining a wedge that cleaved Boadicea's frontline the way Condit's head kicks and clinical punches cleaved Diaz's guard. Ironically, the size of Boadicea's army prevented her from retreating, because the fighters behind blocked the retreat of those dying at the front. Like Diaz, her natural aggressive style meant that as the clinical punches landed, she had no defence: she had never learned to retreat. In the end, the Romans won the day and Boadicea passed into legend. To this day, like Nick Diaz, she is celebrated for her courage, fierceness and aggression in battle. But it was the wily General Condit, who knew when to apply the tactical retreat and the clinical counter-attack, who will go down on history's scorecard as the victor. https://www.mmamania.com/2012/2/5/2772420/condit-vs-diaz-why-the-right-man-won |
BigK22 | 33 |
|
|
Nick Diaz gets found outSo in his first fight against a legit top WW Diaz get's beat, no surprise there, I was never one to buy into the Diaz hype train. He is a very 1 dimensional fighter with good punches and good submission skills against lower tier fighters, nothing more, nothing less, and when you fight against the elite that's not going to cut it. I have been saying for ages that GSP would have EASILY beaten Diaz, and this result only proves it, as Condit made easy work of Diaz. Some Diaz fans are trying to make excuses saying there is no way Condit won that fight, which is just basic fan boy bias, Condit clearly won that fight, and secondly even if Diaz won the fight, if it wasn't impressive enough or emphatic enough to convince the judges and many other fans, then what's his chances against the best WW out there in GSP? Does anyone actually think Diaz' sloppy fight last night would even be remotely good enough to beat GSP? We all know the answer, GSP VS Diaz was all based on HYPE, nothing more, nothing less, as Diaz himself admitted, he had to to talk trash because that's what get's him the title shot, and as he said, it worked. But the good thing is we will actually get a legit WW championship
fight now, as Condit VS GSP is not simply based on hype, but that Condit
deserves to be in there with GSP and brings the skills to be able to
give GSP a legitimate challenge. https://www.mmamania.com/2012/2/5/2772680/nick-diaz-gets-found-out |
BigK22 | 33 |
|
|
You know anyone that can land a leg kick, 1-2, headkick combo or land 150+ kicks and outstrike their opponent or throw what like 20 spinning back elbows while they’re “running away?” What you’re really mad about is Condit didnt stand in one place against the fence like a retard and eat 100 punches to the face like the last 10 dudes Diaz has fought. I don’t know why I’m even commenting, you butthurt loser fangirls don’t even know what you’re watching. |
BigK22 | 33 |
|
|
replied to
So doesn't 17-8 record with wins over absolutly NO ONE make Diaz an average UFC fighter?
in Mixed Martial Arts
diaz is a classless punk, loser.
carlos is a gentleman and deserves to be a champ . diaz is dirtbag and a filthy scumbag of epic proportions.....white will probably fire him after tonight for not showing for the press conf...anyway...so he won't have to retire officially.. maybe GSP and him could fight in a parking lot somewhere at sometime... |
refer | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by claude_gir0ux: i think condit can beat gsp right, and you thought diaz would beat condit and you thought valesquez would beat JDS and you thought the devil would defeat jesus and or the arch angel Michael...lol as much as I love the NBC, he was no shot at GSP unless GSP isn't 100%... |
refer | 35 |
|
|
replied to
So doesn't 17-8 record with wins over absolutly NO ONE make Diaz an average UFC fighter?
in Mixed Martial Arts
overrated..and BJ has been washed up for a few years now AND he is NOT a 170 lb fighter, he's a 155 er..
diaz is a fraud just like his brother.. |
refer | 27 |
|
|
there aint' going to be a rematch....gsp just wants to fight punk ass and not the NBK. Sorry , gsp...punk boy was exposed for the fraud he is...
|
refer | 35 |
|
|
gsp will beat condit in nov, and if box crybaby comes back from his exile, he will get beat up in March or April 2013 by GSP too..
diaz ( got beat up and has a sore box) |
sacores | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stats1: slovak grow up u talk shit and then when some1 does the same u ask a mod 2 ban them??? r u 12?? he's a box just like his boy, diaz...lmfao!!! wha, wha, |
BigK22 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jdr016: mmaencyclopedia Jonathan Snowden The UFC has built a fanbase by having guys who aren't afraid to compete head to head. Carlos looked like a guy waiting for the cops to come. dumb fuck...carlos fought strategically...look the word up, dumb-ass... |
refer | 35 |
|
|
diaz was exposed for the FRAUD that I knew he was ..who has he ever fought?? You can't compare records with condit..condit fought some real warriors...diaz has not...just shows how DUMB the general public is and even some fighters who has diaz winning just like that had valesquez beating JDS..lol...something like 90%..of course , I had JDS too..
|
refer | 35 |
|
|
Condit didn't run you morons..he stood in the middle of the ring with that overrated punk and challenged him...when punk boy had him aganist the ropes, the natural born killer moved the fight back to the middle of the ring ....
diaz ( didn't win a round) |
BigK22 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jonnyg4508: Helwani. Hendo Joe Lauzon They all scored it for Diaz vs Twitter. lmfao..they must have all bet on him.....NO WAY that diaz even won a round.....get lost |
frank the tank | 93 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
If you want to watch 2 goons standing toe to toe trying to knock each other's heads off, go back and watch the old toughman shows. This is professional fighting. It's about gameplans, technique, intelligence and trying to force the other guy to fight your fight, not get sucked into his gameplan. Condit was masterful last night. He clearly has the better skillset and he's obviously a ,ot smarter than Diaz who never adjusted to try to counter what Condit was doing by varying his approach. He just kept plodding forward, used no lateral movement, got hit repeatedly with leg kicks, stiff jabs to the face, spinning backfists, kicks to the body and head. For someone who supposedly running away the whole fight, he sure did screw Diaz's face up pretty good.
Instead of criticizing Condit for executing his gameplan and flat out beating Diaz, maybe you should throw some criticism towards Diaz for being a one dimensional fighter who was clearly outclassed.