Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I couldn't play GB if Rogers was 100%. Indy is the dark horse so ML only on Brady-Belicheck.
|
vanzack | 257 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Basstard: Yea he posted them all and he's been hot. If you're really that interested and not just a person, you could learn to search people's past messages in the Search area at the top. Meant to say "and not just a ............" well you know what I meant, use your imagination..........good luck Temple......I played them -7 also and have questioned it with the disqualification of undisciplined players as well as untimely injuries, but I hope they have interchangeable parts like most great teams. We shall see.
|
Temple71 | 9 |
|
|
Yea he posted them all and he's been hot. If you're really that interested and not just a person, you could learn to search people's past messages in the Search area at the top.
|
Temple71 | 9 |
|
|
replied to
Texas Tech has hired Houston DC David Gibbs plus a qb is transferring....
in College Football
Bob Stoops is the problem, not his staff. Tech def. players might actually learn how to tackle and run through a ball carrier.
Kingsbury will never have a disciplined team, but it's no different than the majority of NCAA teams. Discipline hasn't been part of an upbringing in the US for quite some time. College players are just like their non playing peer groups.....entitled.
|
packers1992 | 6 |
|
|
Can see officials controlling an easy Carolina cover. Like GB to cover a -6, possibly even lower line. Agree that Luck and bunch will cover.
|
phixer | 277 |
|
|
I have a few rules I play by.......one is not to bet against Brady & Belicheck. If you can't play them, best not to play against them. Ravens are very tempting.....can see Suggs actually injuring Brady. Still would not play Ravens. This game is the true AFC championship IMO. Manning better hope N.E. wins cause I can see Ravens beast feasting on him also.
|
phixer | 277 |
|
|
Can't believe you guys are posting statistics of these teams like they played in the same conference at the same level. Pitt much harder SOS and bigger, better athletes. Houston has been playing sand-lot ball for a long time and if Pitt isn't focused could be susceptible to an behind kicking. This play is only for true degenerates. Line is moving IMO because they can't get any sharps on Houston yet. May get late ones trying to hit a middle at 7, but Vegas hates that large a middle so doubt it ever goes past 6.5.
|
YELAWOLF | 31 |
|
|
Been that way for a couple years now. Less defense in bowl games for the lesser teams with very little to play for until the upper echelon match-ups when favorites are more apt to cover.
|
LonghornHoosier | 5 |
|
|
Agree that Ole Miss will win outright if Wallace has a good game. That is a big "if"
|
bmiller1632 | 24 |
|
|
Conference against conference, i.e. Schedule Strength. See if you can figure out who really wants to be there to actually play football. This would be beyond the stats and hard to get information on. Maybe beyond that look at coaches and QB's ratings.
The only bowl that really counts is that winner of the final four.
|
Upside | 8 |
|
|
2-1 is not bad !
|
cfrank63845 | 6 |
|
|
Don't know how he's done this season, but he really stunk it up in the bowls the year he started a tout service. His partner Big East was slightly better, They are good people though, IMO.
|
ancucdimay | 7 |
|
|
I graded your card at 9-8. At $100 per game you win $20. So how much fun was it? Hope you do much better than that, who knows?
|
Upside | 19 |
|
|
have to agree......proven fact it's very difficult to beat someone twice in same year Don't know the stats but heard it too many times. Of course they only need to win not necessarily cover 15 points...........leads to a no play for me.
|
CalBear | 34 |
|
|
You gotta be kidding..ISU isn't that bad? What do u consider bad? TCU can beat them as bad as as they want. That is the question, ISU's record speaks for itself. The have one semi-quality win against in- state rival Iowa early in the season. TCU ought to be pretty loose with no stress and that is when they play lights out usually.
No play for the sharps.
|
clubtnt | 10 |
|
|
U can always go ahead and double it up with Baylor -24-
|
DoubleUp4Life | 23 |
|
|
Yea, ask Oklahoma and K State about Boykin and the way the TCU defense will rock ur world. TCU merely playing down to competition vs. Kansas and almost got caught doing it. Almost only counts in horse shoes.
|
CagedWeakSauce | 26 |
|
|
Why would you waste the gamble with other opportunities
There is no predictability with these two
|
vankiep_0007 | 53 |
|
|
N. Caro -6
Kentucky +13- Baylor -24- Miss St -2
|
Basstard | 2 |
|
|
KSU +6 and ML
|
Raidernator76 | 8 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.