Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
welcome back.... havent seen ya post on here in years |
mixnuts | 2 |
|
|
You got a lot riding on walker. I worried Krylov. I’m not sure walkers free styling kinda unorthodox striking will work against the class of the division. u think the lack of a crowd will help the non Brazilians at all? |
mprubyz | 5 |
|
|
I wanted to bet Maia but I went back and watched the Tonnen burns grappling match from a little while back. Burns was eventually submitted via leg lock. Burns controlled the pace and tonnen never even tried for anything above the waste. Burns seemed HEAVY. We kno Maia isn’t going to go for a leg lock he’s going to go for the choke. I heard big Jon McCarthy say Maia is the heaviest in top control he’s seen since Rickson Gracie. I think this one is incredible hard to handicap. I don’t kno if Maia will be able to take burns back. He’s very strong and generally dictates the movement on the ground. |
kauaib0y | 30 |
|
|
I would also by very surprised to see this fight go the distance. I’m not worried about any funny stuff from the Brazilian judges |
kauaib0y | 30 |
|
|
I like Oliveira a lot. But I this Kevin lee is going to make a run w Tristar. I also kno he’s been working w his Bjj game w donher in my. Remember he was rag dolling tony Ferguson until he got caught in the triangle. He was in full mount a few times early in that fight w Tony but couldn’t get the finish. I don’t like laying the -135 on Lee but I’m going to do it. The problem w lee was never talent or athletic ability. He just couldn’t put it all together I think Firas and the boys in candada will get that figured out. I see a GSP type air tight game plan from lee in this one. And I think he breaks Oliveira a streak and keeps climbing the ladder again. |
kauaib0y | 30 |
|
|
Chewed and screwed at the Piccadilly pub when I was like 16. Just ran like hell into the woods behind the old triboro movie theatre. Man I still kinda feel bad about it to this day. |
TheGoldenGoose | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Streakcash:
yeahh brooww you are the best god luck jaguars vs vikings defenses winning championships
since Carson wentz got hurt the Eagles defense has been lights out at home average less than a touchdown a game. |
Metallica2467 | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: This. All of these "healthcare is a privilege" people are all one illness away from a bankruptcy, or a family member suffering, or worse. It just hasnt happened to them yet, and for some defective reason they have the inability to have empathy. Imagine your child being born needing a medication that costs 100k a year. Now imagine that this newborn, because he is born with a pre-existing condition will at the very least suffer a great deal under your privileged only healthcare system - and at worst you will be bankrupt and the kid will suffer. Now try to answer Goose's question. How would it feel? All of this is true vanzack. We all want everyone to be covered to avoid the scenario you lay out. The problem is it seems to be a right if you can't afford it and a pro ledge if you can. For instance real quick I have a job working 40-50 hours a week. It's a decent job. I don't hate it but it's still work. It allows me to own a house and pay for my health insurance. After all the bills and bla bla I'll have 100-200 bucks a week in spendin money. Groceries fun bla bla. My roommates work part time. One atte YMCA the other landscaping. Jobs that are considerable more fun and less responsibility than mine. One of them is gifted kck behind coverage from mass health. Way better than mine. The other is subsidized so much he hardly pays anything. Leaving them w around 200 spending Money every week. We come from the same neighborhood w similar families and similar level of education from schools with similar prestige . So what gives here. Is it a right for then and a prvledge for me? These r my boys and I want then covered no doubt. But I'm grinding my behind off for the same of worse coverage than my boys who r lazying it up. |
scalabrine | 64 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt: after the last two losses, they were told they need to enact policies and nominate people who are more inclusive of minorities and women. the result- they nominated trump. so, i'm sure they'll figure out the problems and make the appropriate changes for next time. This is what u know who was talking about when he said democracy sucks but its better than the rest. BTW...Trump is verry inclusive w the women.. |
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
|
mgmprofits | 30 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:
Asking the guy, who's posts you don't want to see, to post, is kind of ironic, don't ya think? If you can't handle the truth, maybe you shouldn't be reading my posts anyway ironic.... No It wasn't a question. Is was an insult. And I thought an obvious one. But I should have known someone who draws conclusions based on non sequiturs and speculative leaps wouldn't be able to read between the lines. |
nba-capper | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by YouLikeThat: Sorry, but I'm not calling a split on the road vs two teams that had no business even being in the playoffs "taking care of business." Especially when everyone is jerking you off as one of the best teams of all time. Point being..this GSW cant win on the road is paroting... a suface stat... 3 of their road losses were when leading the series 2-0...series dynamics.. human nature have a hand in that im sure... but the two times it happened prior to tonight.. they rolled cake like in game 4. 2016 Lost road game 3 to houston... rolled in game 4 Lost road game 3 to portland.... rolled in game 4 Lost road OKC game 3... lost again game 4 and in 2015... Lost road game 3 to memphis... won game 4 Lost road game 3 to clevland last year.. rolled in game 4 Sure the warriors are 3-5 in the playoffs... Its a nice clean stat that every ishkabibble jo bumbo on his couch can unerstand.. good for tv... but pointless for us.. YouLikeThat.... You must work for Bill Lumbergh if you think leaving 2-0 and coming back 3-1 or winning elimination road games.. isnt taking care of business... EmmKK greattt |
tonyrome | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by YouLikeThat: I don't think you're getting sucked in. It's impossible to ignore the dominance of the home teams in the conference finals and the finals. It's also hard to ignore how much the dubs have struggled on the road this postseason. Also, something I haven't heard talked much about on here (at least not on a rational level), is that even the most casual fan can see the slanted officiating for the home team in all 3 finals games. I think some of that is due to the more aggressive team getting the benefit of the doubt (yes, home team has been more aggressive all 3 games), and the comfort of the role players being at home. If the splash bros are the alcohol, then Draymond Green is the straw that stirs the drink. We saw it in the conference finals and the finals... he struggles when matched up against better athletes. I think we all know the answer to this, but will Kevin Love start tonight? (he won't). Green's bball IQ is equalized by better athleticism. Removing Love from the equation allows this scenario to take place. Bottom line, I like the Cavs to hold serve at home tonight and cover. GSW lost first road game to Houston.. then won the second Lost the first road game Portland.. then won the second Lost first 2 games in OKC.. then won the elimination game... This is the playoffs... That is what taking care of business looks like...
|
tonyrome | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits: Nobody tells me this stuff...I just figured it out by thinking for myself. Of course they are going to lie to us and tell us differently. Is there an "unfollow" function... Where i wouldnt even have to see ur posts
|
nba-capper | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: you are wrong on many levels here but I will focus on this: first of all, who is they? If THEY is Vegas, you are 100% wrong by saying that THEY want YOU to take the Cavs going forward. The first two games did their job. Their is no public perception or aura with the Cavs bud. They got beat last year by the same team. The score last nite as evident in covers today and ESPN this morning hasnt phased people. With that, the score discrepancy did its job in the first two games. Let me tell you why. With the dubs winning 5 in a row and making history this year, with curry, with klay, etc, the public believes that after the OKC series, this team is destined to win it all. In my opinion, this is where the big seed was planted. This is where the script and the fix began. When I say fix or script here, I mean how it pertains to manipulating the public's mind and continuing to build up the dubs like superpowers. The average bettor looks back to last year as well with this being a rematch. You are part of that public. So what will be interesting to see is where the public sits for game 4. I believe it will still be with the dubs for the reason I mentioned before with the dubs OKC series. The media along with a lot of the puds in here are looking at this series like they did the San Antonio OKC series. No way OKC wins two on the Spurs court, no way they win three in a row. Now, OKC was the better team but the correlation here is that people couldn't get out of their way in that series and just give into the fact that the the ALMIGHTY SPURS would lose that way especially after losing 1 game at home all year. Vegas knew this. Look what happened in almost all of the games in that series. Public bloodbath. Remember the non call on the inbounds? Where was the money that night? Remember the spread? I explained this before but will again, because deep down Tony, I like ya, I do! If dubs win Friday, you know and I know that going forward EVERYONE would be on the dubs regardless of the situation or game. No way dubs can't one more right? That's the public thinking. If Vegas knows this, minds are fixed. If the Cavs win game 4, do you really think the public is going to back the Cavs in golden state in a pivotal game? Public will be on the dubs. If they win game 5, again money is on the dubs til the end. If the Cavs win, well now the public says: look how the dubs came back from down 3-1 against OKC. Money on the dubs. My point is this brotha. Regardless of what happens going forward, money will most likely be on the dubs and the longer we go here, the more money everybody makes. Vegas, league, etc. you have to see this. When I talk about fix and script, this is part of what I'm talking about. Vegas is 5 steps ahead of the sheep brotha. With that, they already know what the majority will do. Look at the last 3 superbowls, look at the NCAA basketball championship game. From there a lot of factors come into play. Pace of play, turnovers, shot choice, inability to make adjustments, foul calls, injuries and SUSPENSIONS due to flagrants and technicals. All of these variables can be controlled buddy. If you can't see that, you are nuts. These cater to the idea of a fix. It may only happen a few times during the game but it takes points off that board and it can add points too. Understand that basketball is the EASIEST to manipulate. See with each team getting damn near 100 possessions a game, the average human won't see the bs as easy especially in the pace of play, fouls and shot choice. These small variables affect the score both ways as do turnovers. Witht this being said, it's very easy for a ref to control a game this way as it is for a future hall of famer. you will most likely question me guys and denounce this thinking but please watch the rest of this series and when the "wtf was that" creeps in, ask yourself where the money is, what the bet is and what the situation is. If it's a big game, I know the answer 9 times out of 10. The rest of the series could get very very interesting buddy. I like your pick for game 4 tony;) notecards and bibliography available upon request for this post. REMEMBER EVERONE, IF YIU DONT LIKE THIS, FINE, DONT USE IT. ITS MY OPINION. This is a bit ridiculous. The lines are set by the market.. and its a big market. Do the books make subtle moves to manipulate the way we bet. ya... Its helpful to interpret that... But this... no
|
tonyrome | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: you are wrong on many levels here but I will focus on this: first of all, who is they? If THEY is Vegas, you are 100% wrong by saying that THEY want YOU to take the Cavs going forward. The first two games did their job. Their is no public perception or aura with the Cavs bud. They got beat last year by the same team. The score last nite as evident in covers today and ESPN this morning hasnt phased people. With that, the score discrepancy did its job in the first two games. Let me tell you why. With the dubs winning 5 in a row and making history this year, with curry, with klay, etc, the public believes that after the OKC series, this team is destined to win it all. In my opinion, this is where the big seed was planted. This is where the script and the fix began. When I say fix or script here, I mean how it pertains to manipulating the public's mind and continuing to build up the dubs like superpowers. The average bettor looks back to last year as well with this being a rematch. You are part of that public. So what will be interesting to see is where the public sits for game 4. I believe it will still be with the dubs for the reason I mentioned before with the dubs OKC series. The media along with a lot of the puds in here are looking at this series like they did the San Antonio OKC series. No way OKC wins two on the Spurs court, no way they win three in a row. Now, OKC was the better team but the correlation here is that people couldn't get out of their way in that series and just give into the fact that the the ALMIGHTY SPURS would lose that way especially after losing 1 game at home all year. Vegas knew this. Look what happened in almost all of the games in that series. Public bloodbath. Remember the non call on the inbounds? Where was the money that night? Remember the spread? I explained this before but will again, because deep down Tony, I like ya, I do! If dubs win Friday, you know and I know that going forward EVERYONE would be on the dubs regardless of the situation or game. No way dubs can't one more right? That's the public thinking. If Vegas knows this, minds are fixed. If the Cavs win game 4, do you really think the public is going to back the Cavs in golden state in a pivotal game? Public will be on the dubs. If they win game 5, again money is on the dubs til the end. If the Cavs win, well now the public says: look how the dubs came back from down 3-1 against OKC. Money on the dubs. My point is this brotha. Regardless of what happens going forward, money will most likely be on the dubs and the longer we go here, the more money everybody makes. Vegas, league, etc. you have to see this. When I talk about fix and script, this is part of what I'm talking about. Vegas is 5 steps ahead of the sheep brotha. With that, they already know what the majority will do. Look at the last 3 superbowls, look at the NCAA basketball championship game. From there a lot of factors come into play. Pace of play, turnovers, shot choice, inability to make adjustments, foul calls, injuries and SUSPENSIONS due to flagrants and technicals. All of these variables can be controlled buddy. If you can't see that, you are nuts. These cater to the idea of a fix. It may only happen a few times during the game but it takes points off that board and it can add points too. Understand that basketball is the EASIEST to manipulate. See with each team getting damn near 100 possessions a game, the average human won't see the bs as easy especially in the pace of play, fouls and shot choice. These small variables affect the score both ways as do turnovers. Witht this being said, it's very easy for a ref to control a game this way as it is for a future hall of famer. you will most likely question me guys and denounce this thinking but please watch the rest of this series and when the "wtf was that" creeps in, ask yourself where the money is, what the bet is and what the situation is. If it's a big game, I know the answer 9 times out of 10. The rest of the series could get very very interesting buddy. I like your pick for game 4 tony;) notecards and bibliography available upon request for this post. REMEMBER EVERONE, IF YIU DONT LIKE THIS, FINE, DONT USE IT. ITS MY OPINION. lotta tinfoil
|
tonyrome | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by sicknesscity: I'm going to post something I believe is interesting here because it's pertinent to the race (Libertarian/Sanders' independent run). My hunch is Bernie will concede to Hillary if he loses when they cast the votes at the convention and hammer out terms. So I don't really believe he will end up being a divider like the "experts" think he'll be. The Libertarians, however, appear to be poised to really make an idiotic protest campaign that'll interfere a bit with the general election. I was out at work a couple of weeks ago and talked to a couple who used to be members of the Democratic Party but they're retired now. They don't want to vote for Hillary and have considered abstaining or voting for Gary Johnson. I mentioned that swing states are important and people need to vote one way or the other, rather than allowing for principles to prevent them for voting. The stakes are too big. Well, they had a guy over who is still an active Democrat in politics. He suddenly interjected and mentioned the race in New Hampshire back in 2000. I can't quote verbatim but he said in 2000 over 20,000 votes were cast for Nader in New Hampshire. Had fewer than half of those votes cast for Nader ended up being cast for Gore, he'd have won New Hampshire and would have gotten enough electoral votes to win the presidency. In fact, the wife admitted she voted for Nader in 2000 and he pointed out that Florida wouldn't have been relevant. When people think they're making a difference by voicing their opinion in that manner, all they really end up doing is affecting the outcome of the election. Bush Jr. was a moron and never should have been president. I believe he loved America but being president requires the temperament and the intellect necessary to understand the impact of long-term decisions. I hope the people dumb enough to vote Libertarian in the general election consider what I've said before they go out and vote this time around. Your for strategic voting... I dont understand the rest... The question is.. who does gary pull from? anyone know yet? He will need to get to 15% and make the debates but thats not a fantasy this year.
|
vanzack | 1017 |
|
|
heyy noww
|
BetsForRent | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by roi_fisher: Golden State has the slight edge in the series due to home court but the value is on Cleveland. Personally, I'm not making a bet on the series price. I will just bet Cleveland game by game and double down off a loss. This strategy is basically guaranteed to make you cash IMO as the Cavs are no door mat -- not this year. If only it were that easy....
|
RayRayK | 18 |
|
|
GL max
|
max58 | 6 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.