Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Detroit winning 4 out of 5 games? It was only the LAL, PHI, MIN & NO.... Spurs by double digits if no one rests. |
Covers | 7 |
|
|
what are you talking about @leftlucky? It's STILL at -7 |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
MIA-OH is better than Ball St this year?! This is might a biased opinion but I'm still in favor of Ball covering. MIA-OH did lose their starting QB but the replacement looks even better! No play and GL to all. |
Covers | 13 |
|
|
I've been doing great on the weekday MAC-TION games! However, this one is a bit puzzling. While I'm strongly leaning Ohio, -10.5 may be too much and a possible backdoor cover from Akron may happen. Will lay off on the sides but WILL take U54 for 2 units. Weather is quite chilly and Ohio is a whopping 1-9-1 O/U with the past 10 being Under!
|
Covers | 7 |
|
|
UNDER 5 |
Covers | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by urrrk: Ball cover +20.5 (buy to +21 for security) - 2 units MAC-TION time once again! Ball State has not lost by over 20pts in the past 10 years to Toledo and I don't suspect it will happen today. MONEY |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
Ball cover +20.5 (buy to +21 for security) - 2 units MAC-TION time once again! Ball State has not lost by over 20pts in the past 10 years to Toledo and I don't suspect it will happen today. |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
TT Bucks O106 / O206.5 Game |
Covers | 10 |
|
|
ASU & OVER |
Covers | 14 |
|
|
UNC is a different animal this year. While Duke has kept games close, they have hardly won. UNC have kept games close but HAS won....so there's my thought process... If that's the case, the line should've been at a modest -5.5 to -7.5 BUT it's at -11 and climbing still. Be careful Duke backers.... -10 UNC (buy a point) |
Covers | 11 |
|
|
MAC-TION Dog Day! +10.5 BGSU +7 NIU |
Covers | 12 |
|
|
BGSU covers +10.5...why not. MAC-TION TIME! |
Covers | 12 |
|
|
Ark St = 0-4 SU & 0-4 ATS. Granted they played two solid teams (AUB & TOL) and got their butts whooped. Although, they played a small school (CARK) and STILL lost by 5. While I agree that there is some value in Ark St as a homedog, I wouldn't put money on that. By my calculations, it's approximately a 70% GASO wins & covers. GASO = -7 for 2 units. |
Covers | 23 |
|
|
@sideJOBplay - if you were betting $500K, you wouldn't be on here. |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
Public money on Stanford tonight since they're a "powerhouse" team. However, Washington (reminds me Houston in terms of their year-to-year development), has dynamic offense and a solid defense. It's true, they haven't played anyone yet and this will be the game to show where they stand. If this game were in Stanford, I'd say other wise but it's in gloomy Washington! The line has held solid with an edge moving in favor of Washington to -3.5 (even though 60% of public bets are on Stanford). WASH -3 (possibly a ML on the safe side) for 4 units please! |
Covers | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by urrrk: Alrighty. Let's be the devil's advocate here. My hindsight is that Miami covers due to them hanging with the NE & SEA. Cincy has been underwhelming losing to Denver @ home and losing to division rival PIT. HOWEVER, before the lines came out, wouldn't you have thought that an accurate line would've been anywhere between -3.5 to -5.5? Why is it up to -7.5 currently in favor of CIN? Is this a possible trap bet for people to take Miami as the solid "public" bet? With the line not moving much away from -7.5, I'm almost inclined to take Cincy... Just my two cents on this game...I'm probably laying off this and watch NCAA Houston pound the hell out of UCONN. |
Covers | 27 |
|
|
Alrighty. Let's be the devil's advocate here. My hindsight is that Miami covers due to them hanging with the NE & SEA. Cincy has been underwhelming losing to Denver @ home and losing to division rival PIT. HOWEVER, before the lines came out, wouldn't you have thought that an accurate line would've been anywhere between -3.5 to -5.5? Why is it up to -7.5 currently in favor of CIN? Is this a possible trap bet for people to take Miami as the solid "public" bet? With the line not moving much away from -7.5, I'm almost inclined to take Cincy... Just my two cents on this game...I'm probably laying off this and watch NCAA Houston pound the hell out of UCONN. |
Covers | 27 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BayAreaVic: NE playing with their 3rd QB at PK just because of trends and Bellichick. Love Houston, you're getting a huge mismatch at QB at PK because there's bellichick. Houston is the play. So true! I'm honestly still pondering it and still think it's a coinflip. The Pats pull these W's out of their fools sometimes. |
urrrk | 8 |
|
|
While Tillman hasn't been on his A game like earlier this season, he may just be the streak AND sweep killer. BALT hasn't gotten swept since July 3rd! Additionally, at quick glance, I believe in a 3 or 4 game series with Tillman pitching last, they win.
Just a thought. I'm taking the O's to save face and win one. |
Covers | 19 |
|
|
Appreciate the insight and that's is where I'm leaning as well. The Pats' will incur a loss sooner or later. Yes, the trends are highly favored with the Pats but without Brady/Gronk and Garrapolo? I'm not too sure if the Football Gods will allow it this time.
|
urrrk | 8 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.