Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Covers' staff
I just realized I created two accounts. I would like to delete this one and keep the other one How can I fix this????
|
ryanjkim2003 | 2 |
|
|
dear elfitz11....... If you think Rory can finish better than Stricker its probably the worst idea EVER.... if you know anything about golf you should know that Stricker is number 2 and Rory is number 8...
eight sounds a lot higher than two to me.... this is not a place for a elementary school kid.... just stop betting and keep playing video games i recommend MLB 2k11 |
elfitz11 | 9 |
|
|
good luck
|
vinygambini | 17 |
|
|
Braves - 119 just because hudson is dirty and braves are hot
Redsox - 160 the redsox better fucking win everytime i bet on them they loose good luck everyone
|
ryanjkim2003 | 1 |
|
|
Good luck.... i like the redsox tonite as well...
|
JJsLocks | 29 |
|
|
you have a good record and all.... also im not even the yanks fan but i would rather get a blow job from a garbage disposal than bet against the yanks
|
Hollywoodturf | 22 |
|
|
Angels!!!!! run line +125
0-0
|
WillBetAnything | 81 |
|
|
good luck
|
SportsMoneyNow | 53 |
|
|
sorry i said sunday i meant saturday haha
|
ryanjkim2003 | 6 |
|
|
1. WhiteSox definitely like the whitesox over the A's. Danks is really good at home and the A's sucks. It doesn't hurt the fact that the whitesox are solid at home
2. Toronto BlueJays. seems like everybody likes this blue jays today. the indians are probably one of the worst batting team in the league. Also i know for the fact that they are the worst against the left pitcher. Cecil is pretty good at home too. Leans i love props bet (this is why i lose money)... eventho the odds didn't come out yet these are what i like 1. Blue Jays/Indians no scoring in the first inning. I think cecil will have no problem getting the first three against the indians but skeptical because i don't think westbrook can get the first three blue jays batters out. 2. Twins/Seattle no scoring in the first inning Obviously king felix is a really good pitcher and i feel like he can handle the twins batters early in the game but not so sure about slowey(however, seattle sucks)
|
ryanjkim2003 | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by cmo1037: here's one i'm looking at: Orioles@Royals Kansas City Royals have only scored two times in the first inning of their last eleven games. (1:5.5 avg) Baltimore has scored only four times in the first inning of their last fifteen games. (1:3.75avg) i know this doesn't take into account the pitching qualities they have faced, but looking at these averages, and my book offering "No Run in the First" @+110, i'll prob have to bite Thanks a lot.... ill definitely look more into that game how did you get those stats btw?
|
ryanjkim2003 | 7 |
|
|
-130 Blue Jays(marcum)/ Indians(masterson)
-160 Giants(lincecum)/ Dodgers(monasterios) I wanna put in more bets.... any good ideas for no scoring in the first inning?
|
ryanjkim2003 | 7 |
|
|
STUDENT..... just love betting.... lost 800dollars so far...
BUT I BELIEVE someday i will get everything back... hahah im an idiot i know good luck to everyone
|
Maverick11 | 234 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.