Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ahh another year and another boombob Clemmons play against their big brother...seesh, you and I both know that even though USC's defense has been terrible, they're are going to manhandle and knock the softies right in the mouth...just like the've done the past 5 years. Dumbo is risking a kid's career just to try and beat Spurrier. It's sad that he's willing to do that. Hopefully after another L, clemmons fans realize what they have up there in tater town. Actually, check that, hopefully they keep buying into the gospel of Dabo and keep their place as our doormat firmly cemented for years to come.
|
Boom_Boom | 72 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by warcameagle56: Well considering South Carolina was a College before California was a state...no point trying to reason with someone who goes up to someone and says "war eagle" though.
|
Boom_Boom | 71 |
|
|||||
Ok, first, I really wanted to play the Under in the BC/Col St game. Second, I'm not a huge trend player but this is amazing. No under trends at all...
|
paparaz | 1 |
|
|||||
I posted this in another thread and figured it might be informative here...
Gameday in Columbia and a night game at Williams Brice doesn't typically produce good outcomes for the visitors. This game is an absolute must for South Carolina. After the comments by Spurrier after last weeks game (when they were covering until the last drive), I would be shocked if this team, especially the defense, doesn't come out motivated. Enough of the intangibles... Regardless of what any of the talking heads will lead you to believe, USC's much maligned Dline is much, MUCH better than Indiana's. In the Mizzo/Indy game last week, Mauk running for his life. On top of that, Indiana's offensive line is much, much smaller than USC's massive line (84 lbs less and only two over 300 at 305 and 307) add to the fact that the left side of USC's line has two potential 1st round picks and you've got a massive talent gap compared to Indiana. Yeah, Indy's RB is a stud, USC's aren't too shabby either and their QB is head and shoulders more talented. South Carolina is going to man handle Mizzo in the trenches with the final being somewhere along the lines of 41-24. Truth be told, Mizzo will probably only score that much because USC's young secondary will most likely give up a big play or two. If Missouri gets behind early, it could very easily be a blowout. Mizzo is no A&M and I'd venture to say ECU is better as well. I'll come back after the game and we'll see how things turned out... |
paparaz | 1 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom: About the Clemson game tomorrow if any are interested. This is a tough spot for Clemson... coming off one of the most emotional losses I have ever seen. Game could go a lot of ways here.. Clemson close win Clemson Blowout even a possibility of a Clemson loss sometimes a loss like last week can beat you twice LOL...you're a trip. So you think there's a chance that Clemmons loses? You do realize ECU put up 70...70...on North Carolina. Oh and yeah, USC beat ECU...but yet you think they'll lose to Mizzo. Here's a hint, USC's much maligned Dline is much, MUCH better than Indiana's. Also, you must not have watched the Mizzo/Indiana game last week because if you did, you would've seen Mauk running for his life. On top of that, Indiana's offensive line is much, much smaller than USC's massive line (84 lbs less and only two over 300 at 305 and 307) add to the fact that the left side of USC's line has two potential 1st round picks and you've got a massive talent gap compared to Indiana. Yeah, Indy's RB is a stud, USC's aren't too shabby either and their QB is head and shoulders more talented. Look, I know facts don't matter to you and your Clemmons line of thinking but South Carolina is going to man handle Mizzo with the final being somewhere along the lines of 41-24. Truth be told, Mizzo will probably only score that much because USC's young secondary will probably give up a big play or two. Williams Brice is no joke at night (as your Tigers know) and if Missouri gets behind early, it could very easily be a blowout. |
Boom_Boom | 71 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak: Adding: Saturday Afternoon: .5U - Miami Ohio UDML +213 @ Buffalo *** I upgraded UAB to a "Best Bet" and my top play in the Saturday Afternoon time slot. I like the 1st half UNDERS in the Colorado State/Boston College and UTSA/FAU games if I can get favorable lines. Please give your insight into the UNDERS....very curious as these are my favorite plays. Thanks.
|
jimmydafreak | 191 |
|
|||||
Dude you're clueless...it doesn't matter what happens with UF or South Carolina, you're going to constantly bash. South Carolina throughly dominated that game and UGA was lucky to be in it. Sure the missed FG and not running the ball hurt but South Carolina could've easily scored on that last drive if needed, UGA could stop them at all. As far as the calls that "went in Carolina's favor", I hope you're kidding? Gurley head butted and punched a player but yet South Carolina got the penalty? The spots were horrendous on the last two plays. A pass interference that the UGA wr was quoted as saying he thought it was on him. And then the most atrocious call I've probably ever seen...After the South Carolina qb threw the interception, the refs called a chop block on the gamecocks...they said "after the interception, personal foul, block below the waist on South Carolina"...So they called a blocking penalty when in fact the offense was actually trying to make a tackle after an INT?? Ok...
What about Clemson getting throttled by UGA? Thats the difference between the SEC and ACC. Clemson can't hang with the big boys, and as long as Dabob is coach, they never will. 5-peat.
|
Boom_Boom | 150 |
|
|||||
Im curious as well....
|
Bmarlin | 3 |
|
|||||
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=41&sub=101481037&page=1
LOL, dude you're such a welch...but, I'm glad you're back. I'll be fading you ALL YEAR LONG...especially your ACC games. LOL, the ACC.
|
Boom_Boom | 116 |
|
|||||
Kinda like going back and reading my thoughts...dude is going to be faded ALL YEAR by me. Quote Originally Posted by paparaz:
Clemson will get bludgeoned by SCar's defensive that game probably will be over by the 3rd just like the last 3 years. UF/FSU, I'm not so sure as they're much closer in talent.
Clemons is probably a top 15-20 team while SCar, UF and FSU most likely top 10 teams. That is if you toss out FSU's loss to NCSt.
I'll take SCar straight up and if you give me the points in the UF/FSU game and I'll take the bet all day. Either way your nonsensical rants about Clemson will more than likely end come Saturday night as they finally play a team ranked inside the top 67. |
Boom_Boom | 381 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by Mr-Stache: I agree, Clemson beats South Carolina in a revenge situation. I see Auburn beating UGA though. I will take an unstoppable run heavy offense over an unstoppable pass heavy offense any day. Defenses are similar though I think Auburn's defense is under-rated and playing better. Auburn at home gets it done vs Georgia. They will put 50+ on Georgia. Auburn is thinking championship right now. Florida is a sitting duck next week at South Carolina. Talk about revenge and teams headed in opposite directions. South Carolina will not lose to Clemson. Don't know why you and Train think that game will be any different than the last 4 years? Essentially the same teams except South Carolina might have there starting QB and RB this year and its at South Carolina. Clemson plays a soft ACC schedule and then get hit in the mouth in Columbia and lose by 2+ scores for a 5th straight year.
|
TRAIN69 | 44 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by Cover34: guys ruined a good thing..he was a great Capper and Loved the site as well the love for the game of football for many yrs. -C34... Well he said he would leave last year after that SEC beatdown of two ACC schools and he didnt. Hopefully he has finally become a man of his word. Doubt it though.
|
abizzo24 | 34 |
|
|||||
Lol...All you have to do is look at your grammar to tell that you're a Clemson fan. Also, didn't you say you wouldn't come back after that SEC vs ACC debacle last season? #youreajoke
|
Boom_Boom | 54 |
|
|||||
Wait a second...Isn't this the same clown who said he would never come back if FSU and Clemy lost to their rivals last year? I guess his word doesn't mean that much?
|
Boom_Boom | 323 |
|
|||||
Wait...didn't you say you would be gone after that debacle on the last week of the regular season last year?
Man of your word, I suppose?
|
Boom_Boom | 345 |
|
|||||
and you're an idiot if you dont think Duke can win it.
|
Boom_Boom | 43 |
|
|||||
I thought you said you would be banned for good after that debacle for your ACC teams against the big boys....? Man of your word? Or just man of many words...
|
Boom_Boom | 43 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by Gobigred32:
Yes iowa state couldn't finish that's why they lost has nothing to do with the refs. Refs are going to make bad calls there human happens in every game. Do you know how many times I have seen that play happen this year in college games too many times to count. Refs normally don't call a block/charge on that play last sec of the game is it wrong idk but it's been happening all year in games not just this game. Yes the refs screwed up on withey he should have been fouled out earlier but there was also two horrible calls early ok withey that shouldn't have been fouls but that's how it goes refs make mistakes it happens all the time. Iowa state was at home played the game of thier live hit a school record 17 threes and attempted 41 free throws yes iowa state choked they should have won by double digits with those stats. It comes down to defense iowa state can't defend simple as that. Anytime you make 17 threes and attempt 41 free throws you should win big especially at home but they didnt that's the difference between. An elite team and an average team. Over the years of playing ball and coaching I've Learned refs don't decide games they will make bad calls and if you don't win you werent good enough it's your own fault you should have hit one more three could have played better defense. All iowa state had to do was play defense and they would have won but they don't know what defense is. Ku knew how to finish down the stretch. I'm not even a ku fan I'm a huge Nebraska fan I'm just sick of people that make excuses ref didnt cost the game. How about the Super Bowl last play of the game the 49ers players was held but ref didnt call it because refs tend to not blow thier whistle last seconds of the game it's not jus this game happens every week in sports part of the game.
|
JFen31 | 96 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by ashlandarrows:
PAPARAZ......you are either a s.carolina homer or high on coke if you think that s.carolina defense will run over clemsons offense (one of, if not the best in the country) and playing at home...is this the same carolina defense you speak of that gave up 44 POINTS to that offensive juggernaut from gainesville?? amazing how some posters on here are absolutley clueless!! Hey garbage for brains...what was that you were saying? |
Boom_Boom | 381 |
|
|||||
Quote Originally Posted by ashlandarrows:
PAPARAZ......you are either a s.carolina homer or high on coke if you think that s.carolina defense will run over clemsons offense (one of, if not the best in the country) and playing at home...is this the same carolina defense you speak of that gave up 44 POINTS to that offensive juggernaut from gainesville?? amazing how some posters on here are absolutley clueless!!
Actually, I'm neither. And you my friend, are the clueless mouth breather. If you would have watched the SCar/UF game, or hell, even read the box score, you would realize that UF did nothing offensively to score. SCar turned the ball over 4 times on their side of the field which all lead to points. If you weren't so fucking clueless, you would realize that Florida only had 183 yds in the game. Dumb pricks like you make me want to vommit.
Also, I never said SCar's D would "run over the Clemson offense". I said they would get bludgenoned and that SCar would run away with it. And yes, I stick by those two comments. This defense has burried the Clemons "high powered" offense the past 3 years. Why would this year be different? Same players for the most part on both teams. No way Clemson scores more than 27 and no way that swiss cheese D gives up less than 30. |
Boom_Boom | 381 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.