Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by erdoc: Plays for 1/30 Bradley +10.5 Sacramento State +8.5 UNC Greensboro +9 North Tx +6.5 Northern Arizona + 6.5 UCSB +6.5 That's a lot of plays. I'll keep waiting on Lines and see if I missed any. You gonna do a lot of damage to poor people on this forum with this inaccurate posting. Firstly, the originator of this system turned the scale to the sliding one. Teams with #140-200 should be 10+ dogs before qualifying while teams 200+ should be 7.5+ dogs before qualifying. This is due to the evolution. Secondly, one could still use the old scale which uses teams ranked 165+ being 6.5+ dogs. Either way, neither UNC Greensboro nor UCSB should be plays because Mercer is ranked 139th and UC Irvine 69th. You also missed UTSA as a play. Get it straight.
|
erdoc | 84 |
|
|
Degen, any timetable on the spreadsheet update? Thanks.
|
DegenGamble | 866 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.