Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by harvick_29:
Andy Reid career record playing team's over .500 is 48-55 |
Frank the Bank | 153 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vegasslim: andy reid? one superbowl trip and how many nfc champioship game losses?? Andy Reid career record playing team's over .500 is 32-60 |
Frank the Bank | 153 |
|
|
49ers -2 1/2 48 1/2
eagles -2 1/2 55 colts -2 1/2 46 bengals -7 46 betonline.com |
motowner | 95 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity: Eagles @ Saints -1.5 Niners @ Green Bay +3 eagles are at home vs saints |
motowner | 95 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser: there is zero chance in hell 49ers -3 at green bay eagles -3 at saints are you kidding me you mean green bay -3 and saints -3, right? saints are in philly |
motowner | 95 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bob696969: "teams are never as good as their best game and never as bad as their worst game" ....football is a team game, and qbs get too much credit for winning and too much blame for losing. Niners coming off about as bad of a game they can play offensively. no vernon davis vs the colts was a huge loss. if he plays tonight, niners offense will look much better. on defense, loss of aldon smith hurts, but no patrick willis is just as big of a loss if not more. willis is a 3 down player that is the key to the niners defense as he is great at stopping the run and dropping into coverage over the middle on passing downs I like the rams tonight if either/both willis and davis dont play. vernon davis is playing patrick willis is out |
TopNotchKata | 63 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
Well all more advanced counting systems do that. But the K-O system uses what is called an unbalanced count. When you use a balanced count you will always be at 0 on the last card. With an unbalanced count you don't get that. With the K-O system you up your wagers when you hit a certain number such at +1 Example.......You start your count at -7 when the deck starts. When it hits +1 you then up your wagers. So you don't have to do any calculations. Just do your usual -1, 0 or +1 for each card that comes out. This is why I tell everyone to start out with the K-O system. You don't have to remember any matrix with tons of numbers in it. Here you have just one simple matrix with A,B, or C in it. Now of course there are some adjustments if you want to get that extra .50% out of it. But I tell everyone to just master the basics of it and worry about the rest later. I mean really, most won't play again or it will be many years before they take another A/C or Vegas trip. Personally I juse my own count that's a level 3 count. It's a combination of a Uston's Advanced Point Count and mine. I never tell anyone to use this one. For example, here are the numbers I use. 2 = +1 Again I use this because it's very powerful, but very, very difficult. It's just how I learned to begin with, so I have stuck with this level type of system. If I started now I would no doubt use K-O. There has been another author that has refined K-O even more
YOU MENTIONED STARTING WITH A NEW DECK START YOUR COUNT WITH -7
IF YOU JUST SHUFFLED AND CUT THE CARDS WHY START WITH -7 AND NOT ZERO |
lakers34kb | 76 |
|
|
IF YOU DON'T HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THE GIANT'S WINNING WHY DID YOU MAKE THE BET IN THE FIRST PLACE
|
RickDaRulah | 27 |
|
|
THE PATRIOTS HAVE PLAYED IN 4 SUPER BOWLS 3 WINS ALL BY 3 PTS 1 LOSS BY 3 PTS
|
pleasure_P | 59 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stopweeping:
I only read one line and had to stop.. The Giants had two games handed to them ???? First off going into GB where they were 8-0 and outplaying them is impressive and then going to beat a 9-0 home 49er team who played great except for the turnovers is equally impressive keep in mind they were underdogs in both games.. Now onto the Pats who had a scrimmage playing Denver and talk about a game HANDED TO THEM, Ravens gift wrapped that game with an easy td drop and a 32 yard chip shot missed and I won't get into the pass interference non call at the goal line. they were 7 point favorites and should have lost game and all... I don't know if you even watch football but going on the road in a playoff enviroment beating 2 undefeated teams is pretty good.. The rest of your write up may have been good but the first line is embarassing and I had to stop reading..
49ERS WERE 8-1 AT HOME LOST TO DALLAS WEEK 2 |
IWannaWinAgain | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by veronica27:
will list them in order of what time they came on .. 1pm/4pm/primetime .. btw , Veronica is my wife you can call me the whatever you want but .. lol i had a name on here called EJLuv or something but I started using this name ... low profile holme boy , but you done tripped that up .. haha you had to call me Veronica didnt you . teams no good on 7 pt T week 1 >> falcons browns chiefs rams phins bucs steelers colts shawks giants 22 - 10 week 2 >> chiefs ravens bears jags s-hawks 24 - 5 push on vikes phins and chargers week 3 >> pats eagles jets rams chargers steelers 26 - 6 week 4 >> browns eagles vikes broncos raiders jets 26 - 6 week 5 >> eagles cards giants titans jags texans bucs 19 - 7 week 6 >> panthers lions steelers texans saints vikes 20 - 6 week 7 >> skins lions titans chargers raiders cards rams colts ravens 17 - 9 week 8 >> colts saints skins ravens broncos pats shawks cboys 18 - 8 week 9 >> bills colts chiefs browns raiders titans pats eagles ... push on browns closing line of 11 , lost by 18 im not going to list the iffy ones meaning pushes .. is neither here nor here as far as it meaning anything now .. IT DOES SHOW ONE THING THAT IT IS BEST TO TRY AND GET THE BEST LINE .. THERE R A BUNCH OF THEM LIKE THAT , with best line you sneak a win in teasing it .. etc is too much typing to show all of them and talk about in any detail 16 - 8 week 10 >> chargers bills colts chiefs eagles bucs panthers lions ravens jets vikes 21 - 11 week 11 >> jets bills vikes rams cards giants chiefs 21 - 7 week 12 >> 27 - 5 shawks eagles chargers steelers -11.5 rise killed em to -4.5 won by 4 at kc .... giants got blown out at saints on mnf week 13 >> 13 to list , lol eagles skins bills bears browns raiders bengals falcons bucs cboys rams pats 19 - 13 week 14 >> phins chiefs bucs bills raiders 27 - 5 week 15 >> jags bucs giants bears titans pack vikes texans broncos jets ravens steelers 20 - 12 week 16 >> texans broncos jets rams bucs chargers cboys falcons pats were good with a closing line of 9.5 but no good 10 n up .. is too much to go into about the line movement and everyone has different lines .. i just list couple for the heck of it .. 24 - 8 week 17 >> skins lions bills panthers raiders bucs cboys 25 - 7 getting the best line , as we all know too well >> is key all the way around for sure
LOOKING AT YOUR LIST THE GIANT 5 RAVENS 5 PATS 3 49ERS 0 THATS HOW MANY TIMES THOSE 4 TEAMS WERE ON THERE SHOWS YOU WHAT 2 TEAMS SHOULD BE PLAYING IN THE SUPER BOWL PATS VS 49ERS
|
stoltified | 75 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by FrozenTundra:
talk about over thinking things. Line imo is right: 1. tough to beat the same team twice in one season 2. revenge factor for ne for last sb 3. ne has the better record I love the Giants chances, but NE is not a bad team and I actually thought the line would have come out as NE -4, but -3.5 makes sense, in between two key numbers 3 & 4 for the right team. If the books came out Giants -3, money would be flooding in on NE. Books want 50/50 action.
49ERS BEAT SEATTLE AND RAMS TWICE LOL |
ActionMagnet | 65 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SEC_CHEF:
NO ROOKIE COACH HAS EVER MADE IT TO THE SUPER BOWL.... The Gmen are for real... -Chef
GEORGE SIEFERT 49ERS 55-10 |
Europa | 76 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.