Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I like all 1q & 1h unders. I never like betting unders full game though. Any of these matchups could have a 35pt 4q. |
RayRayK | 18 |
|
|
Brady is 2-3 against the spread this year. |
Buddys1989 | 28 |
|
|
One thing's for sure, if the Chiefs do win, it won't be Miller Lite cans they're cleaning up in the streets. We're talking about Missouri, home of The King of Beers! |
LOWRYLOVER | 43 |
|
|
Army v Navy > Liberty Bowl to Navy.
Tradition |
Guy_2U | 14 |
|
|
"1-6 on Sunday for -790 units" Is a unit $1? Who bets 150 units per game?
|
seafood_pasta | 15 |
|
|
It's funny that everyone says "the public" is on Clemson for the past week, when "the public" generally bets on game day, close to kickoff even. If you hear about money "pouring in on Clemson" right after the line comes out, you can be pretty sure that's not "the public" pouring their money. I'm not saying that anyone should bet any different because of where the money is or is not. But it is the "wise guys" laying big bets on Jan. 1
|
FoolishGame | 13 |
|
|
The Raiders lost that game for sure. Cooper drops a sure touchdown, Carr was very off. Chiefs have been impressive, that game not as much though.
|
yosemitesam | 6 |
|
|
Then Dak would be fresh for the playoffs after Romo goes down again. Romo has never shown that he can win a superbowl, but he has shown that he cannot play 10 consecutive games. Dak may not win the superbowl this year, but I'd still play him and build going forward. Will Romo finally get dumped by Dallas, or is JJ going to get disappointed by him one more time?
|
ClubDirt | 33 |
|
|
If he is 51%, the only idea worse than following him would be fading him....49% losers. Why would you want to fade???
|
jdr016 | 19 |
|
|
Dontbookme, Oregon only had 2 time outs left because they had just taken the other to try to get the ball back. OSU would have run the clock out if the Ducks didn't use the first time out. After that, they deserved to have their bills rubbed in it.
|
Tanttii | 27 |
|
|
WoW! I'm at work just checking my phone. Houston ML, thought that was toast....what happened????
|
vc1028 | 42 |
|
|
Market research (that's my first ever rolly face).
|
starlight | 19 |
|
|
Either on them or TxAM....and probably won't really be bloody, but some people will lose money. So I guess you are as right as you can be while having no idea what your talking about.
|
starlight | 19 |
|
|
The majority of the money is on the Rams. The percentages you see on Covers are basically "votes" from Cover's members who don't necessarily have ANY money on the game.
|
MrFace | 61 |
|
|
They also beat the Jets, Jags and a slow starting Seahawks team before losing to the Chiefs at home earlier in the season. So, all sarcasm aside, they have beat one decent to good team, and 5 BAD teams at home this year.
|
FinJerry | 22 |
|
|
"San Diego is red hot at home" - translation - 2 game winning streak, beating STL and Oakland.
|
FinJerry | 22 |
|
|
Chargers will be home for the wild-card game. Not a home game, but at home....watching someone else play.
|
FinJerry | 22 |
|
|
I'd say Washington out of those. I'm hesitant to pick Washington because they are not and have not been winners. I don't care what the Bears have done, it's all about Cutler there. He is in a tailspin. And I think the Giants have a good chance of winning. You say they have nothing to play for, but there is always a W to play for. And knocking people out is nice too. I don't think Eli believes he has nothing to play for either. I am sure he is still selling his team on a playoff spot. I'm thinking about New Orleans, did you already use them?
|
fpellegrino10 | 9 |
|
|
I get it....I'm only thinking about me though. I decided that since Cincy is stuck between the Ravens and a Thursday date with Cleveland, and Seattle has looked so unimpressive that I'm going with the Chiefs again. KC has the best O & D out of the three, and I don't think the Jets are more than a half step ahead of Jax & Oak. We'll see.....
|
Blazoo | 31 |
|
|
I've said earlier, I can reuse teams as many times as I want to. So I'm not worried about who I'm using later. And I'm pretty sure Seattle will be #1 pick this week. The sandwich is something that concerns me however. I would not use them next week. I always stay away from divisional games, like Dallas and Seattle the week before.
|
Blazoo | 31 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.