Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Schneider is in for NJ. I'l take the Devils and that +120. He's better than anybody Nashville has available to run out there.
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
But losing on the final game of the season - 'tis the Cowboys destiny.... I agree! It's the Jerry Jones Cowboy way! Make that a DecaYeah! |
Covers | 32 |
|
|
I'm not a big follower of hockey. But can somebody help me out here? Why am I getting +183 on a team that's 14-9 and didn't play the previous night?
|
Covers | 2 |
|
|
Brutal.
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
Hmmm. Anytime you give me a winning team and the chance to bet against Buffalo at -125, and that winning team isn't playing a back to back; I'm going to take that bet.
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
I can't recall EVER seeing a -401 moneyline in hockey. EVER! What's worse for Buffalo is that the Sharks have lost their last two so they will be wanting the win, so even to +356 I cant touch Buffalo. Best to leave this one alone.
|
Covers | 7 |
|
|
OOPS, scratch that. I meant to say... LAC < LAK (by 13) |
Covers | 16 |
|
|
LAC < LAK LAK < GS (by 31) therefore LAK < GS (by 13) OK, so the Clippers got their fools kicked by the Lakers on Tuesday night. Then, the team that kicked their behind goes (the Lakers) out and gets their fools kicked by 31, but now I'm supposed to think the Clips are a better team? I know its back to back and travel, but the Clips have got to prove to me that they are worth a damn. Golden State plus those points all day babay! |
Covers | 16 |
|
|
Everybody is on the Clippers, so you know what that means! Lakers not only to cover but n the moneyline as well!
|
Covers | 21 |
|
|
I agree with Abel73.
Raiders: Bad team, rested, at home and moneyline dog. Pittsburgh: Bad team, banged up, on the road, and moneyline favorite as well? Gotta go Raiders in this one.
|
Covers | 29 |
|
|
If it weren't for Carson Palmer, I'd like Arizona a lot. But, when was the last time we actually saw that Carson Palmer back from the time when he was actually good?.
|
Covers | 95 |
|
|
Hmmm. I just don't trust the Rams. I will surely be taking those 11.5 points. If I had a pair, I'd take the Jags straight up. The Jags are going to beat somebody this year, and I truth Sam Bradford to throw that key interception. |
Covers | 25 |
|
|
Two things to like about the Jags (AND of course the 19 points). #1. Seattle does play Houston next week. The Hawks might get caught looking ahead a little bit. #2. Pete Carroll had an opportunity to run it up last week vs a guy he's had some bad blood with in the past, Jim Harbaugh. I don't think Carroll will keep his foot on the gas. I'll take those 19 points! |
Covers | 35 |
|
|
AJK, as a Raiders fan myself, I really would like for what you said to be true. I really would. I really HOPE I'M WRONG. I really do. But,well lets see what NFL.COM says about Mr. Pryor. [QUOTE] "Terrelle Pryor will be the man under center when the Oakland Raiders open their season Sunday against the Indianapolis Colts. [ENDQUOTE] Source https://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000238455/article/terrelle-pryor-doubted-inside-raiders-organization And I watched all of the Raiders preseason games. Game 1, Cowboys 17 at Raiders 19 Terrelle Pryor 6/10 88 0 1 (Not exactly setting the world on fire.) Game 2, Raiders 20 at Saints 28 Terrelle Pryor 1/5 9 0 0 (Wow, almost 2 whole yards per attempt. I guess I should be happy since he didn't get intercepted.) Bears 34 at Raiders 26 Terrelle Pryor 7/9 93 1 0 (Yeee haw, a TOUCHDOWN. In his THIRD preseason game! Break out the champagne!) Raiders 6 at Seahawks 22 Terrelle Pryor 3/8 31 0 1 (Oh. Back to reality.) So, lets add that all up, thats... 17 of 32 for 221, 1 TD, 2 INT Exactly what part am I supposed to get excited about? I took the Colts for 16 points (the max amount) in the office pool this week. I love the Raiders (I know it doesn't sound like it, bt I do), but $50 is $50 after all. . |
Covers | 23 |
|
|
I remember January 25, 2003, it was happy day. It was the day before Superbowl 37. The Raiders were going to win the Superbowl and beat Jon Gruden to boot, SWEET!!! Happy times for a Raider fan like myself. Fast forward to year September 2, 2013 and I have to ask myself, when will Gruden lift his curse!!! Come on Jon enough is enough already!!! I have endured some bad Oakland Raider teams over the past 10 years and all I can say is, THIS team is worse than last year. At least last year the Raiders had a talented tight (Myers) and a QB who, while he couldn't throw the deep ball any longer (Carson Palmer) could at least accurately hit the tight end. . Now, we've got two QB's who can't hit the broad side of a barn and no tight end. If I were a defensive coordinator, why wouldn't I simply put 9 men in the box and dare Pryor to pass?? When they don't pass, tackle McFadden until he gets injured, it should take longer than the first half. The Raider defense didn't get any better this offseason. The Colts overpaid to upgrade their defense. I really think this one is gonna get ugly. Indy: 30 Raiders: 16 |
Covers | 23 |
|
|
I'm not one for putting my hard earned money down on pre-season games. But, if I were to bet, I'd have to take Oakland here. Dallas got their win last week, they should be happy. Besides, I'm always ready to get points when taking the home team. The Raiders will probably actually be trying to win this one.
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
I don't see how anybody can even think about laying points in a game nobody cares about. I'll take Dallas and those 3 points. Not that I think Dallas is so great, but this is the HOF game after-all.
|
Covers | 27 |
|
|
I got screwed on my UNDER 6 runs in the final two innings!
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
I like the OVER here, The only thing that makes me pause on it is that I am expecting Cleveland to do most of the scoring, so they are probably only going to bat 8 times.
|
Covers | 2 |
|
|
7.5? What is this total so low? Looks like a 5-4 kind of game to me.
|
Covers | 2 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.