Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
It's nice to see a defense that can make those sorts of plays.
|
mikeru3 | 1047 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345: The Giants D didnt stop anyone!!GB didnt make the easy plays they make 9 out of 10 games.Rodgers missing wide open recievers foir 2 tds,8 balls dropped by recievers.Its like anything else its one game and Rodgers and co. had their worst game I can't agree with this. There were numerous plays where Aaron Rodgers had all day to throw the ball and he couldn't find an open receiver. The Giants definitely gave GB their chances but at other times they played completely solid. Of course San Fran was able to defend the New Orleans receivers for long periods of time as well. |
composite | 34 |
|
|
Playoff Record: 4 - 0 (+4.48 units)
Missed the +9 on the Ravens and I don't really have a feel on Giants 49er's. I feel it could go either way and the only play I would make would be Giants ML. I doubt I will have a play this week though. |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by 44-dimes: If smith goes out of bounds it's game Over. Big ,mistake running it in If he stays in bounds and doesn't get the TD they could have kicked a fg with about 30 seconds left in the game. There are no guarantees and you can't expect a player to be thinking about that on the field. |
BankOnIt22 | 995 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by livie: The only team still in this with a defense is SF. NE, NO, GB defense all suspect. So SF wins Superbowl? There are still 5 defensive teams left and 3 offensive teams. |
BankOnIt22 | 995 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2: Dude pushed him after the play and no call. Ref right there. Bizarre. And you have no problem with the Saints player grabbing his facemask after the play? Of course. |
BankOnIt22 | 995 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by billsneedhelp: wow this is unreal how did he not jump on the ball instead of picking it up?? 3 saints turnovers in 1 quarter Smaller guys tend to pick the ball up, bigger guys tend to dive on it. |
BankOnIt22 | 995 |
|
|
Playoff Record: 2 - 0 (+1.86 units)
49ers ML (+175) Giants +9 (-115) |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 6 |
|
|
That was definitely interesting. Ironic that the announcer didn't think a couple extra tenths would matter when there were 20.1 seconds left.
|
allamay1608 | 7 |
|
|
I will admit that I have not paid as much attention to the NFL this year as I have in past years. Still I typically have a good playoff record so I will make a few plays.
Playoff Record: 0 - 0 (+0.00 units) Giants -3 (-105) Broncos +9 (-110) |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 6 |
|
|
Forgot you had to manually link here. Here is the link again of the old thread: https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=101227716
Record: 1-0 (+0.91 units) |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 2 |
|
|
Due to a typo in the title this is a repost of this thread: https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=101227716 . I plan on using this thread all year.
Ah time to start this up again. Not nearly as many plays this season. Just gotta get myself loose for the playoffs. Record: 0-0 (+0.00 units) Washington Wizards +10.5 (-110) Had to wait for this one move from +11 (-115). |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 2 |
|
|
Ah time to start this up again. Not nearly as many plays this season. Just gotta get myself loose for the playoffs.
Record: 0-0 (+0.00 units) Washington Wizards +10.5 (-110) Had to wait for this one move from +11 (-115). |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 2 |
|
|
Usually when there is a high percentage of people that disagree with you it reaffirms your strong play. However, I can't back the Falcons on the road against a decent team. If anything I would take the Giants, but I don't like agreeing with the majority so its probably a no play. Lastly, I'll just say that I wouldn't be shocked if the Falcons somehow won that game.
|
FrankT55 | 178 |
|
|
Just saw the news myself. All I can say is wow.
|
CMJohnson1 | 8 |
|
|
It's clear that some people think you are talking about Delonte West instead of David West.
|
MoneyShot | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MoneyShot: I love rondo and im sure you do too BUT if you were a real celtics fan, you would consider anything that would help this team longterm. if paul guaranteed to sign a contract extension, trading rondo for a future hall of famer would be the right play for the franchise. The problem is that you may be sacrificing team chemistry for skill. Personally I would always take the best team of all time against the best 5 players of all time. |
MoneyShot | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Jetjeff12: ...when a team is winning everyone believes in each other, but it is when things go bad that really shows who believes in who. Exactly. |
best_bets | 41 |
|
|
There is no definite answer for being sharp and being square on many games. Some people would consider your last 3 plays square since its what "anyone" who watches Sportscenter at least twice a week would choose. Personally the only plays I like this week are Chi +9, Baltimore Ravens +3.5, and San Diego +5.5 but I haven't even been keeping up with the NFL like I usually do. Anyway, if you are winning then there is no need to care about what others think about your play. A win is a win whether its a square play or a sharp play. Everyone makes a public play or a square play every once in awhile.
|
koonendez | 16 |
|
|
Simple wager here. When is the last time Clemson has won a game while ranked in the top 10?
Boston College ML (+800) |
dnt_fade_me_bro | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.