Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ahh. Yeah, casinos don't like to lose. They want that money 50/50 . Or, there was a few sharps that dumped a whole bunch of money on UNC
|
HabsHater88 | 19 |
|
|
YIKES...Fanduel at the standard -110
|
HabsHater88 | 19 |
|
|
Same. 4.5 on fan duel
|
HabsHater88 | 19 |
|
|
Nice call. I had Clemson +6.5 and Connecticut (-11.5) in a parlay
|
Romans12 | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fever: Also like NJ's chances vs Isles tonite. Devils in the midst of a 9 game opener on the road this season are actually getting home for the first time. Nassau Coliseum is a busride over from the home base in Newark. The guys have slept in their own homes for the first time this season. Islanders have more talent this season but are no match for the Devils when NJ is playing the way they should.
NHL YTD: 15-18 +1.74 units
Sides: 6-6 +8.25 units Totals: 9-12 -6.51 units 1 unit = $100.00 Saturday Pucks: RANGERS -112 BOSTON 11.20 units
This one’s being posted early because I’ve got a lot of errands to run today and won’t be around much. I absolutely love this game. I’ve wagered 11.20 units on the Rangers tonight.
As you know, a very profitable system in the NHL has been playing home teams in their first game back from extended road trips. Boston fit that scenario the other night against the Lightning but, won the game. History says that when a team off an extended road trip wins their first game back, they usually fall flat on their face in their second game back. That’s the angle against Boston.
The other angle is the Rangers will look to atone for that embarrassing loss to the Thrashers the other night and they are desperately in need of their first road win. I am impressed with the Rangers offensive chances generated however and you figure that eventually, the percentages are going to improve. The Rangers have averaged at least 35 shots on net in their last 5 games...scoring on only 4.7% of your shots on net though is well below the norm and you figure it's going to even out.
Consider the Rangers have won the last 8 head to head meetings, outscoring Bostin 31-12 in those 8 games. Boston are 9-26 in their last 35 vs. Atlantic Division.
Good luck. I'll try to post tonight's wagers when I get back in a little later on. |
fever | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by fever:
NHL YTD: 15-18 +1.74 units
Sides: 6-6 +8.25 units Totals: 9-12 -6.51 units 1 unit = $100.00 Saturday Pucks: RANGERS -112 BOSTON 11.20 units
This one’s being posted early because I’ve got a lot of errands to run today and won’t be around much. I absolutely love this game. I’ve wagered 11.20 units on the Rangers tonight.
As you know, a very profitable system in the NHL has been playing home teams in their first game back from extended road trips. Boston fit that scenario the other night against the Lightning but, won the game. History says that when a team off an extended road trip wins their first game back, they usually fall flat on their face in their second game back. That’s the angle against Boston.
The other angle is the Rangers will look to atone for that embarrassing loss to the Thrashers the other night and they are desperately in need of their first road win. I am impressed with the Rangers offensive chances generated however and you figure that eventually, the percentages are going to improve. The Rangers have averaged at least 35 shots on net in their last 5 games...scoring on only 4.7% of your shots on net though is well below the norm and you figure it's going to even out.
Consider the Rangers have won the last 8 head to head meetings, outscoring Bostin 31-12 in those 8 games. Boston are 9-26 in their last 35 vs. Atlantic Division.
Good luck. I'll try to post tonight's wagers when I get back in a little later on.
I agree. The Rangers went hard into the free agent market and came away with Drury and Gomez. Nothing but the Hardware is going to be satisfactory this season.With that in mind a visit to Beantown would go far to help the sputtering Blueshirts out of their early season funk-o-rama. |
fever | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JoeMacDonald: B won't happen..Once the Tciket os ordered there are no refunds..Subs can cancel but DTV keeps the cash
I guess the question is what would be more effective? a) A boycott where nobody orders, or b) A plan where everybody orders as usual, and then cancels on the same day (presumably before the deadline) Both look pretty good to me, although "b" probably has a better chance of making the news |
Mr_Covers | 126 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by JoeMacDonald:
sp57, A few companies, sportingbet for one, have offered to submit to paying taxes. The feds have avoided that question for now. As I mentioned in the column, up until now, the tone of the industry has always been, "You better tax us, because you can't stop us. We're getting rich no matter what you do, anyway." You don't say that unless you are sure the other side has run out of bullets. They hadn't. Maybe now would be a good time for a more conciliatory tone. something the politicians would find less threatening. The EU is thinking of brining this topic up with the US. I hope they take a proper angle. Here's my take on taxation of on line wagering...It won't happen..If on line wagering is regulated and taxed by thre feds thast forces Congress to legitimize the activity..Legislators representing conservative states with lots of evangelical Chrisitians might consider such recognition of on line wagering to be political suicide..The number one goal for any politician isn't to make a difference or to do some good for the people or any of those other tired assed cliches..Nope..The number gola is to do what ever it takes to get re-elected...
IMO no memeber of Congress in their right mind would introduce or sponsor any such Bill....Again, IMO....
|
Mr_Covers | 126 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by 3ptshooter:
Good article. What you left out is the fact that this movement will assist in helping the big Vegas casinos get a toehold into online gambling. Some have already either bought assets of offshore sites, or are researching possible investments. The best bet is to buy the Vegas casino stocks, because they will benefit handsomely from online gaming. That's fine..But those of us who live in states where gambling is all but illegal won't be helped no matter what the Vegas books do..I can't bet with them now and I don't expect to ever have that opportunity.
Trust me the feds will NEVER let sports betting on line out of Pandora's box...It's a miracle that in some states we can bet on the ponies thru our computers...IMO on line betting on the horses is neither enjoyed nor encouraged by Congress...The activity is merely tolerated....
What gal;ls me is how our friends across rthe Pond(UK) can walk out of the coffee shop and into a betting shop and wager on two dogs duking it out in the street....I try to get down a 10 dollar bet on the Mets and the morality police are beating down my front door..It's illogical..
|
Mr_Covers | 126 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BetToWin: '
w3rdv303, I don't think I read the same article as you. it doesnt say gambling will be shut down, just that the ways to get money to offshore sportsbooks will be blocked. nobodys going to stop gambling but it could get real tough to send money easily. This is very similar to what appeared in the Wall Street Journal the other day, so it's not like this is the only place thinking about this stuff. I agree..If the feds who I think have far bigger fish to fry but waste time on trivial matters, create laws to make it inconvemnient to get money to offshore books I'll be dropping out of the on line betting fun...
This really sucks..I am one of those small dollar casual players that likes to have some action going..What the big deal is, I don't know..It's politics..
I throw this one directly at the feet of ultra right wing politicos who have to crawl into bed with. the Bible thumpers to get re-elected
|
Mr_Covers | 126 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.