Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kurt is a good plate race driver. But, I would think Stewart and Harvick would be the 2 to watch, from that team.
If my money were to be on a Gibbs car, Kenseth would be my choice. Edwards winning the 500 would surprise me. But, RFR didn't show a lot of muscle last year. That might change this year. Doug Yates always has strong motors. Ragan and/or Gilliland would be worth throwing a little change at, as Ragan won 'Dega and Gilliland has finished 3rd in the 500, in FRM cars. It might be worth a shot too, if you can get them in the field. Just my .02
|
AshyLarry | 22 |
|
|
Sounds like he is a great asset. He can be the new FF!
|
AshyLarry | 9 |
|
|
Akers has been off, this year. He missed, in the first St. Louis game, costing a tie. Now, he cost them a loss. He won't be going to the Probowl.
|
nc1capper | 7 |
|
|
GL, taz! They are back up, at the other place.
|
tazs_crew | 8 |
|
|
Wouldn't Campbell have taken all the reps, in practice, since the Houston game?
GL, I hope you are correct. |
BigNiner | 41 |
|
|
Does your program account for home field advantage?
|
AFNfootballnerd | 683 |
|
|
I like the FG prop, too. I hope Akers is on, tonight.
|
Pho-20 | 19 |
|
|
Obviously, I'm biased.
Looking into the stats, these teams are pretty similar. Some stats won't matter, with backup QB's for both teams. Chicago averages 4.4 yards per rush and gives up 4.2 6.9 yards per pass and gives up 6.1 SF averages 5.6 ypr and gives up 3.7 8.0 ypp and gives up 6.1 Chicago, offensively, is 10th rushing and 31st passing. Defensively, they are 5th against the run and 10th against the pass. SF, offensively, is 1st rushing and 28th passing. Defensively, they are 8th against the run and 3rd against the pass. I think the rushing offense and defense numbers are the most important, because we really don't know what we will get with the pass. Special teams should be key, as well. Chicago averages 18.2 yards per kick-off and 8.9 yards per punt. They give up 21.1 ypko and 4.6 ypp. They hit 85.7% of their FG's and average 41.7 yards per punt. SF averages 25.4 yards per kick-off and 12.4 yards per punt. They give up 28.8 ypko and 9.6 ypp. They only hit 71.4% of their FG's and average 46.7 yards per punt. I give the slight advantage to Chicago's coverage teams and kicker. SF's special teams coverage teams and Akers has not been as efficient as they were last year. Andy Lee will probably make the pro-bowl, so that should help field position. They just need to be smart enough not to kick it to Hester. These defenses are very similar. Chicago is 5th and SF is 3rd, overall. Chicago is 2nd and SF is 1st, in scoring defense. Chicago's defense forced 30 turnovers, this year, with 19 being interceptions. SF has 8 sacks in the last 3 games. This looks like a slugfest. |
daveniner | 1 |
|
|
I saw that. I couldn't believe that I was seeing that on live TV.
|
kritter88 | 24 |
|
|
What's Washington's chances of covering, tomorrow night?
|
THEMUGG | 5 |
|
|
I think he was pissed because Miles was throwing the ball towards the end of the game, when they were up pretty big. Basically thought he was running the score up.
But, the commentators even said that LSU needed style points, in case they lose next week and there is a vote for who goes to the championship game. |
THEMUGG | 5 |
|
|
Congrats, on the Niners game. Tough way to lose the Cincy bet. I was on them, too.
|
The_Swamp | 37 |
|
|
The 49ers are just lucky. Their players had nothing to do with the team winning. I mean really, they are only 9-0 against the spread.
Maybe everybody can give credit where credit is due. Alex Smith won this game, on offense. Gore did almost nothing and is injured, again. Hunter filled in ok, but nothing spectacular. If it were not for the passing game, NY would've won this game easily. I have to give the defense credit, too. They gave up way too many yards. But, they didn't break when the game was on the line. |
choiOi | 77 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mrquija27:
Can we just add that word around town is that this is what happened. I am not calling this fact but this is what is being talked about. Harbough came to schwartz as you all saw, it wasnt that though. When Harb. did that. Schwartz said "what the fukc is that" and Harbough responded with "fukc off". Like I said this is not fact, but it is from what I heard a realistic scenario of what happened. If that is how Schwartz asked the question, then Harbough should've responded "that is how real men shake hands". If Schwartz came at Harbough with like that, then it's kind of hard, in the heat of the moment, to not respond like a dick. I'm not a lip reader, but it looked like Harbough yelled "woooo" like Ric Flair would have. I don't see why everyone thinks he should have to curb his enthusiasm after such a great come from behind victory. It just sounds, to me, like Schwartz can dish it out, but can't take it. He needs to quit being such a sore loser. His team can't win every game. |
Scorpio85 | 49 |
|
|
I can't see this happening. His ego is waaaaay too big.
|
gmitran | 3 |
|
|
So, that little NFL record doesn't mean anything?
|
Coach-G | 15 |
|
|
Awesome day, SLD.
|
sportsladyd | 15 |
|
|
go to atdhe.net or justin.tv
|
diggin15 | 5 |
|
|
Nice writeup. I think the 49er offense will be improved and the defense should be good again. I hope you're right.
|
cc247 | 24 |
|
|
Great call, BEE. It's too bad Navy squandered too many opportunities for us in the early game.
|
BigEastExpert | 36 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.