Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
It' didn't seem to post my comment, I picked the Cowboys +2 and under 47, I gave my reasoning in the previous message and it didn't go through I'm not going to go through that again. |
Covers | 5 |
|
|
KY gets loss number 1 at the hands of Georgia this evening. Georgia is a good team, if KY is not absolutely ready for battle they could easily lose this game.
|
Covers | 2 |
|
|
I'm liking Minn tonight plus the points, I look for them to win straight up but I'll play with the points, with a belief in Minn. it only makes since to parlay that with the over they go together. If Minn covers the game will go over they go together like peanut butter and jelly.
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
Taking the Bulls, like the under. Cleveland thinking about the long break just worrying about travel plans. Chicago being at home is a big advantage in this one, Bulls win doing what makes them stand out and that's to play strong "D".
|
Covers | 22 |
|
|
Sure glad we have people wondering why the Cowboys are only favored by a touchdown. This one in a no brainer, have you seen the Cowboys play with an injured Romo, or Weeden I don't know who I prefer playing QB Jags cover this number easily. Jags +7.5 don't think there will be a whole lot of scoring. After this one the English will want to stick to there own flavor of football.
|
Covers | 8 |
|
|
What am I missing? After some light due diligence Cal seems like the obvious choice in this game.
|
Covers | 11 |
|
|
I really like the White Sox tonight against the Dodgers, pays real good +165. I also am leaning towards the Angels at -128 CJ Wilson going up against Hahn who is pitching his 1st major league game. The Red Sox over Cleve I still like Peavy who is looking much better this season compared to last, & Tampa Bay over Miami in the battle for Florida the Rays have historically rocked Alvarez when he played for the Jays.
My picks our based on factors other than what I mention as you know I'm looking at trends that talk to me along with an emphasis on current streaks of the key players on the respective teams. In my search for value. White Sox +163 Angels -128 Red Sox +104 Tampa -116
|
rastad | 18 |
|
|
This line is, out of line. The Bulls +5 and under 191 almost seems to easy. The Spurs are to old to keep up with these guys, I'm not a fan of the Bulls, but how can you not appreciate the way they play the game. The NBA needs teams like the Bulls, they actually seem to care if they win or lose. They'll throw up there occasional bad game, but not for lack of effort.
|
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Just curious, as I'm to lazy to look it up, but the last time these 2 teams played may have been the late great Woody Hayes's last football game. Although it dates me, I remember that game. Woody actually did nothing at all that was out of the ordinary. College football needs to get another "Bo" & "Woody" rivalry going, today's coaches are so worried about paychecks. Bo and Woody would have coached for nothing, in fact they would have paid for the opportunity, they each weren't concerned what people thought of them and they didn't read the papers. They were truly unique and the loyalty that each showed to their respective schools was also unique, Texas A&M tried to lure away Bo at one time with more money than any coach at the time was being paid and it wasn't about the money. Ohio State wasn't on the schedule.
|
Covers | 51 |
|
|
I can't believe what I'm seeing, the message board for a NFL football game and I'm reading about how the Illuminati is fixing games. Anyone who believes these games are actually fixed are true morons. If I asked the obvious why? I'm afraid I get such psychotic answers that your families ought to have you committed. So I'm not asking that, but please guys take your psychotic and paranoid personalities to some other sight. I assure you the NFL has to much of a good thing going than to allow the games to be fixed. Individual players the same is true, they make too much money to fix games guys. How much would it take to pay off somebody, the obvious choice would be a ref. I assure you that scenario has been thought of and I wouldn't doubt if the Referees are scrutinized extremely closely and couldn't break wind without the NFL knowing the scent. Whenever I'm in the presence of someone that says the games are fixed, I don't agree or disagree I simply do what I can to change the conversation and take note of the person that said it, knowing that the person's IQ level is lower than previously thought.
If one must talk about it though, you know my thoughts, you wouldn't change my mind whatever you argued, but I would like to humor myself and hear your evidence. Also please include how it would materialize, such as who you'd pay, and how it would precisely go downs. Please don't say anything about the Illuminati or I'll write you off as a paranoid schizophrenic and suggest hospitalization.
|
Covers | 232 |
|
|
Man this is an easy game to cap, when they look this ez I question what I'm missing. Neither team likes to play defense, and Michigan is very motivated. The over most definitely along with the Wolverines minus the small spot considering the points that will be put up in this one. Michigan 48 Nebraska 31
|
Covers | 11 |
|
|
Hawks game plan will be ball control, keep NW off the field. Colter has the ability to be quite dynamic but coming off an injury the rust will show early. I'm taking the under in the first half along with NW # the 4 points. Really like the first half under. I would take the under in the game but this one may be tight and I would want to protection from an OT Over or frantic 4th quarter scoring.
|
Covers | 12 |
|
|
These teams are both down this year, Georgia Techs offense though is a safe offense or at least it's supposed to be I believe the difference in this game is playing turnover free. I'm taking Georgia Tech +7 and under 55 I believe the safer bet of the 2 is the under 55. Parlay them and emphasize the under. 4 units on the under and a 2 unit parlay the under and Ga Tech +7. You will make a few dollars.
|
Covers | 8 |
|
|
OK guys whats the deal here, I think 12.5 fits better than 6.5 and I would feel more comfortable laying the 12.5 because that's what it should be at first glance. What are we missing? Last I checked Vegas isn't giving it away. What is up? Something, and we don't know what, don't play Miami and you kick yourself, play and lose because you know better you kick yourself. What to do, anybody got a clue. I don't like playing a game the public is siding 90%.
|
Covers | 20 |
|
|
Not a lot of information to determine what kind of teams these are this early in the season. Chiefs look like a Super Bowl Team defensively, and they surely will come to earth. The Eagles looked like a Super Bowl Team on both sides of the ball in the first half of the Washington game, and have had moments of brilliance but seem vulnerable. Chiefs are going to try to slow down the game, Philly speed things up quite a contrast of styles. Andy Reid doesn't have much patience when it comes to the run and tends to abandon the run altogether when things start falling apart, will Charles have a game becomes the question. You have to like the under and the Chiefs if you believe in Charles brilliance the opposite if not. You might as well parlay the game if the Chiefs cover it will go under if Philly covers it will go over. I don't like the game but I believe Andy Reid will want this game, I'm backing the Chiefs along with the under 51.
|
Covers | 82 |
|
|
Bovada has a policy of holding on to your winnings as long as possible. After requesting payouts they no longer send your money by Western Union or Moneygram. They instead wait about 2-3 weeks and send you a check written on a bank in the Orient. Needless to say your banker won't be to excited about that check and put a hold of 10 days on it, by the time you get your payout from Bovada it's about a 30-40 days from the time you request it. Bovada by holding on to your money gets to continue to collect interest for the majority of the time. I personally suggest finding a different sportsbook, as I'm going to do in the near future.
|
dafirestar | 1 |
|
|
Listen do not bet against MI, it's a big spot but it's going to be showtime in AA today. The over is actually the better play, but Michigan will flirt with covering, such a huge spot, but if they don't put up 78 + today I will be shocked look for PSU to score 60 just because of extra possessions Michigan will score fast and furiously and show the country they are relevant. They were embarrassed last Tuesday in a big way, these guys are winners, you will think your watching the Lakers of the 80's today, Showtime at Crisler Arena. My play is over 61.5 first half and over 131 for the game. Small parlay over and Michigan -21.
|
CancelChristmas | 126 |
|
|
I usually just read the posts, just like most players the big plays I see usually lose. The line is so hard to beat, and as the year goes on it gets harder. After football, I put so much into it, I no longer have the energy to get into B Ball the way you have to be to make money. In football I can make money, I don't see how you can do it in BBall just watching the the stuff I see and the change of fortune where a for sure winner turns into a loser out of no where. Don't get me wrong it happens in football, but nothing like BBall. I play bball for fun and entertainment but my serious gambling is College Football, and to a slightly lesser degree Pro Football. The other night I had a play on Michigan -2.5 against Wisconsin and the under whatever 120 or thereabouts. With that BS half court shot I lost both ends out of nowhere, I can't think of how certain double victory turns into double defeat. You see it coming in football, that came out of nowhere. I hate basketball.
|
Cross21 | 123 |
|
|
This game doesn't have much excitement centered around it, the only post is about the Terps not scoring.
|
Covers | 4 |
|
|
These are a couple of down teams this year and one (Connecticut) seems to be further down. That and the fact that the Carrier Dome will be packed and loud giving the Orange a definite home field advantage. I lay the 3, but more convincing to me is under 44 simply based on extremely weak offenses combined with a Connecticut team with a above average defense spells under 44.
|
Covers | 51 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.